280 likes | 412 Views
A Non-Gaussian Asymmetric Volatility Model. Geert Bekaert Columbia University and NBER Eric Engstrom Federal Reserve Board of Governors* * The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, or its staff. Overview.
E N D
A Non-Gaussian Asymmetric Volatility Model Geert Bekaert Columbia University and NBER Eric Engstrom Federal Reserve Board of Governors* * The views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, or its staff.
Overview • We extend asymmetric volatility models in the GARCH class • accommodates time-varying skewness, kurtosis, and tail behavior • provides simple, closed-form expressions for higher order conditional moments • outperforms a wide set of extant models in an application to equity return data
Standard GARCH • The Glosten, Jagannathan, and Runkle (1993) extension of GARCH (GJR-GARCH) has been found to fit stock return data quite well • Engle and Ng (1993)
Our Extension • First, we define the “BEGE” distribution
Reasonable Acronym? Bad Environment Good Environment
Narcissistic? Bekaert Engstrom Geert Eric
Moments under BEGE • Simple, closed-form solutions
Embed BEGE inGJR-GARCH • Shape parameters follow GJR GARCH-like process
Application • Monthly (log) stock return data 1926-2010 • Estimate by maximum likelihood • Compare performance of a variety of models • Standard GARCH (Gaussian and Student t) • GJR-GARCH (Gaussian and Student t) • Regime switching models (2,3 states, with and without “jumps”) • BEGE GJR GARCH (including restricted versions)
Comparing Models:Information Criteria • BEGE also dominates in a variety of other tests
Out of Sample Test: VIX • The VIX index is the one-month ahead volatility of the stock market implied by equity option prices under the Q-measure.
VIX Hypotheses • Assume that investors have CRRA utility with respect to stock market wealth
VIX Test Results • Regression (1990-2012, monthly) • Orthogonality test
Portfolio Application • An investor invests, period-by-period, in the risk free rate and the stock market. The portfolio return is
Risk Management • GJR weights are more aggressive • GJR: “1 percent” VaR breached in 15 of 1050 periods • BEGE: 1 percent VaR breached in 10 of 1050 periods
Macroeconomic Series Slowdown = four quarter MA < 1% (annual)
Monetary Policy • Should policymakers care about upside versus downside risks to real growth or inflation? • standard “loss function” suggests maybe not • But • typically arises from a second order approximation to agents’ utility function. Why not third order? • is it plausible? • evidence of asymmetries in reaction functions (Dolado, Maria-Dolores, Naveira (2003))
Conclusion • The BEGE distribution in a GARCH setting • Accommodates time-varying tail risk behavior in a tractable fashion • Fits historical return data better than some models • Helps explain observed option prices • Applications to macroeconomic time series analysis, term structure modeling, and monetary policy are planned.