190 likes | 283 Views
Further English Language Development of Experienced ATCOs. Czech Air Navigation Institute. Division of Air Navigation Services of the Czech Republic Established in 1983 Initial and recurring training for : 230 licensed Czech ATCOs and ATCO trainees
E N D
Czech Air Navigation Institute • Division of Air Navigation Services of the Czech Republic • Established in 1983 • Initial and recurring training for: • 230 licensed Czech ATCOs and ATCO trainees • Technicians and support staff • Foreign ATCOs and professionals from more than 15 countries
Czech Air Navigation Institute • Training follows Eurocontrol common core content and ICAO guidelines • Wide range of skills training within Air Traffic Services • English language training
English Language Level 4 or Higher • Training and testing all ATCOs since 2001 • ELPAC test • Recruitment minimum level 4 • 100% Level 4 or higher since 2009 • After 100% ATCO level 4 certification, what next?
ATCO Refresher Course • Mission Statement: Further develop English language communication skills of active ATCOs to enhance operational safety and external productivity • Operational: signed on to an ATC position • External: job-related, but not ‘on the mike’ • Functional English in various working environments
ATCO Refresher Course • Licensed ATCOs, level 4 or higher • 5 days, 3 X 90 minutes per day = 22.5 hours • Once per year • Participants relieved of all other job-related duties • Led by 1 to 3 different native English teachers with Aviation English teaching experience, selected and trained specifically for this course
ATCO Refresher Course • Core Language Components • Aviation vocabulary building • Listening (mostly from materials developed in-house) • Speaking • Reading • Refresher grammar
ATCO Refresher Course • Classroom activities • Aviation-related case studies with discussion • Student presentations (end of week) • Analysis of real world ATC dialogues • Both native and non-native English speaking pilots and ATCOS
Sample Teaching: Medical Emergency • Listening and Analysis using materials developed in-house • Relevance • Medical emergencies occur in approximately 1 in 25,000 passengers • Flight diversions occur in up to 7% to 10% of these cases* • Mandate • Where standard phraseology does not suffice, communication will be conducted at all times in plain language that is precise, concise and unambiguous • *Source: Commercial Aviation In-flight Emergencies and the Physician • Emerg Med Australis 2007 Feb 19(1):1-8 Review
Sample Teaching: Medical Emergency • February 19, 2011 • Air France 636, Paris to Houston, emergency diversion to St. John’s, Newfoundland • Dialogue length: 1 minute 10 seconds
Sample Teaching: Medical Emergency • 0:06 ATCO “Heart attack” • 0:17 Pilot “Cerebral attack” • 0:24 ATCO “Brain aneurysm” • 0:46 ATCO “Brain issue” • 0:51 Consensus “Brain attack” • Cost of consensus: 5different attempts, 51 seconds, 9 radio transmissions
Sample Teaching: Medical Emergency • Stroke: rapidly developing loss of brain function due to a disturbance in the blood supply to the brain • Specific enough to allow an actionable response • Not too specific so as to mislead medical responders • Cost of consensus: 1 attempt, 5 seconds, 2 transmissions • Ensures safety for the ailing passenger and all other parties
ATC:Sir I just want to confirm that the patient is a 57 year old male with a heart attack, is that correct?Pilot:Negative negative it is cerebral problem cerebral (unreadable) <pause> (unreadable) attack ATC:Okay sir say again the conditionPilot:Cerebral attack for a passenger brain problems with blood in the brainATC: Okay some sort of brain aneurysm is that correct? France 636 I think I stepped on you there just confirm it’s a brain aneurysm of some sortPilot:I don’t know this way in English (unreadable) in the brain for Air France 636 passengerATC: Ok, yeah, I take that it’s a brain issue, maybe an attack of some sort in the brain, is that correct?Pilot:That’s correct perfect and we need assistance
Sample Teaching: Medical Emergency • Solicit feedback from students • Repeat subtopics as necessary • Success is measured in applicability to real-life working environments