490 likes | 611 Views
Chapter 14 – Moral Development. Self-Control - behavioral manifestation of morality. Learning morality - society’s goal: resist temptation - delay gratification. Development of self-control - age 1 learn limits - by 2 inhibit own impulses - by 3 use techniques.
E N D
Chapter 14 – Moral Development • Self-Control - behavioral manifestation of morality
Learning morality - society’s goal: resist temptation - delay gratification
Development of self-control - age 1 learn limits - by 2 inhibit own impulses - by 3 use techniques
4 Learning mechanisms 1. General parenting style Control + caring -> kids learn selfcontrol vs. too strict or too laissez-faire -> kids don’t learn to control selves
Modeling - learn to inhibit self by watching model who verbalizes rationale - kids as models: later better at restraint
3. Reinforcement - rewards for alternative behaviors
Punishment - best = mild punishment & rationale - sometimes rationale alone is enough -> internal attributions Problems - resentment, coercion, attention for bad behavior
4 Self-Control Methods 1. Freud’s imagery = create image of desired object - but reduces self-control
2. Distraction - focus on alternative activity 3. Self-instruction - talking self through the impulse
4. Create “moral” self-concept - convince children that they are “good” via “dispositional praise” - self-concept directs future behavior
Consequences of Self-Control If delay gratification at 4: - boys at 11 = better impulse control, attention span, & behavior - girls at 11 = more socially competent - both at 15-18 = better self-control, reasoning, SAT scores
Prosocial Behavior Development • Toddlers - beginning to help others - limited by cognitive skills
Preschool/Elementary - sharing, helping - motivated by rewards & authority - later growth of prosocial behavior without rewards
Adolescents/Adults - concern for fairness, helping others - behavior based on principles
Skills needed Perspective-taking - more prosocial if understand others’ feelings - lack of egocentrism
Empathy - feeling what another feels
Moral Reasoning - belief that one should behave a certain way - preschoolers don’t use fairness - by school age, simple view of fairness - later appreciate complexity of fairness
Influences on prosocial behavior 1. Personal Responsibility - when we feel responsible, we are more likely to help Personal responsibility decreased by: - diffusion of responsibility - authority figures
2. Mood - more prosocial if happy 3. Cost to self - more prosocial if no cost to self
4. Culture - more altruism in nonindustrialized nations - collectivist vs. individualistic societies
Percentages of children above altruism mean • Nonindustrialized Kenya 100 Mexico 73 Philippines 63
Industrialized Okinawa 29 India 25 US 8
Aggression Origins of Aggression 1. Biological/instinctual - Freud - Lorenz
2. Cognitive/Intentional - aggression is goal-driven Hostile goal = intent to harm Instrumental goal = gain own ends
Development of Aggression Infants & young toddlers (< 1.5 yrs) - aggression without intent to harm
Preschoolers (2-5) - intimidate to gain own ends - rise in instrumental aggression
a. 2-3 - more physical retaliation - most aggression is instrumental b. 3-5 - less physical aggression - more verbal aggression - increasing hostile aggression
Elementary School (6-11) - react with aggression to provocation
Stability of Aggression very stable - from toddlerhood - for boys and girls - boys are more aggressive
Sources of Aggression 1. Frustration - frustration-aggression hypothesis
2. Parents Punishment - teach physical aggression Parental style - model lack of concern for others - do not monitor/supervise - use physical discipline more
Sex Differences - males more physically aggressive worldwide - males are targets of aggression - testosterone + socialization - girls: “relational” aggression
4. Culture - some societies are more violent
5. Media - Bandura’s Bobo doll - “good guys” rewarded for violence
General findings: - consistent link between TV violence & child aggression - risks: learning to behave violently desensitization to violence fearfulness - perpetrators unpunished - few consequences for victim
6. Individual Differences - minority of very aggressive kids a. expectations b. domination of others c. biased cognitions - assume hostile intent • Sum: many possible contributors
Controlling Aggression 1. Freud’s catharsis - venting anger to decrease it - does not work
2. Eliminate reinforcement a. incompatible response technique - ignore mild aggression & reinforce good behavior b. time out - for serious aggression - removes attention for aggression - does not model aggression - helps child gain self-control
3. Model & coach - teach nonaggressive conflict resolution • Teach empathy - train awareness of others’ feelings
Moral Reasoning Dilemma = competing demands for justice • Kohlberg’s Stages 1. Preconventional Level - moral judgments are based on physical consequences, authority/power, own needs & desires
2. Conventional Level - reasoning based on conforming to social norms, doing what is “right”/duty, wanting the approval of others
3. Postconventional Level - based on universal, abstract principles - fairness/justice
Judy is 12 years old. Her mother promised that she could go to a special rock concert.
Support for Kohlberg 1. Correlation between age & level of moral reasoning 2. Sequence of stages 3. Relation between moral reasoning & behavior
Criticisms of Kohlberg • Highest principle may differ by society • Highest stage reached • Male vs. female morality
Gilligan’s Theory • Morality = care & responsibility in relationships - integration of rights & responsibility
3 stages • Self - concern solely with own needs (selfish) • Others - other’s needs at expense of own (selfless) • Both - considering own & others’ needs
Boys and girls show both justice and care morals • Conclusion: Not one morality (justice), but possibly many
1. Preconventional Level - consequences, authority/power, needs & desires 2. Conventional Level - social norms, “right”/duty, approval 3. Postconventional Level - based on universal, abstract principles