160 likes | 365 Views
ERCOT Studies and Proposal on Reliability Energy Pricing. John Dumas Director Wholesale Market Operations. Outline of Discussion. ERCOT Usage of Non-Spinning Reserves ERCOT Usage of RUC Pricing Effects when Non-Spin deployed Proposal on how to minimize impacts to prices.
E N D
ERCOT Studies and Proposal on Reliability Energy Pricing John Dumas Director Wholesale Market Operations Reliability Deployments Task Force Meeting
Outline of Discussion • ERCOT Usage of Non-Spinning Reserves • ERCOT Usage of RUC • Pricing Effects when Non-Spin deployed • Proposal on how to minimize impacts to prices
Outline of Discussion • ERCOT Usage of Non-Spinning Reserves • ERCOT Usage of RUC • Pricing Effects when Non-Spin deployed • Proposal on how to minimize impacts to prices
ERCOT Usage of Non-Spin Approximately 55 Non-Spin deployments between go-live Dec 1, 2010 – June 30, 2011 Most deployments lasted between 1 and 3 hours. The February 2 deployment lasted 53 hours, but all other deployments were less than 12 hours.
ERCOT Usage of Non-Spin (continued) On average, ERCOT operator utilizing smaller Non-Spin MW deployments over time
ERCOT Usage of Non-Spin (continued) The LSL amount injected by offline non-spin start-up varies
Outline of Discussion • ERCOT Usage of Non-Spinning Reserves • ERCOT Usage of RUC • Pricing Effects when Non-Spin deployed • Proposal on how to minimize impacts to prices
Analysis of RUC Commitments (May/June 2011) • RUCs May/June analyzed to determine levels committed • ERCOT Operator reason for RUC commit: • For Capacity/Ramping Issues, Congestion/Voltage, or the reason was unlisted (If both Congestion and Capacity was listed, the reason used was Capacity/Ramping)
Analysis of RUC Commitments (May/June 2011) • There were total 2,436 RUC unit hours with Energy Offer Curves in May and June. • About 2/3 of RUC committed resources with Energy Offer Curves remained at LSL as price takers • 1,604 unit hours at LSL, with 832 unit hours moved above LSL • Average MW above LSL = 14 MW for RUC interval • Implies that RUC energy offer curves are not economic to SCED
Outline of Discussion • ERCOT Usage of Non-Spinning Reserves • ERCOT Usage of RUC • Pricing Effects when Non-Spin deployed • Proposal on how to minimize impacts to prices
Non-Spin Deployment impacts on prices The red line below reflects the average HUBAVG LMP across all Non-Spin deployments showing a $50 average system price reduced by $10-15 after non-spin deployed/stabilized. - Data below for Dec 1- May 28 Non-Spin Deployments (47instances) Graph shows the HUBAVG LMP from 30 minutes prior to Non-Spin deployment to one hour after Non-Spin deployment for all Non-Spin deployments except the February 2 deployment, which was excluded due to the extended period of $3001 LMP following deployment.
Outline of Discussion • ERCOT Usage of Non-Spinning Reserves • ERCOT Usage of RUC • Pricing Effects when Non-Spin deployed • Proposal on how to minimize impacts to prices
Proposal on how to minimize price impacts • ERCOT has considered how to minimize or remove pricing impacts to prices from deployment of reliability services • ERCOT’s recommendation will : • Compensate for the effect that the block of injected LSL energy from non-spin resources has on prices, and • Create reliability energy offer curves that are near the end of the aggregate market offer curves.
Proposal on how to minimize price impacts • ERCOT’s proposed solution at a high level is: 1- Create reliability energy offer curves as follows: • At the end-of Adjustment period, ERCOT calculates the price at 90% of the total capacity for the COP Online Quick Start Offer Curves in the upcoming Operating Hour (90% or agreed to %). This will be the offer floor for the Non-Spin segment of the EOC. • Offer Curves are modified by SCED • For Offline Non-Spin by applying the offer floor from LSL to HSL • For Online Non-Spin by applying offer floor to the segment of the curve from (HSL – sum of all AS responsibility) to HSL • In this manner, ERCOT will give a dispatch economic order preference to market resources • Non-spin energy is inserted in the offer stack above competitive offers
Proposal on how to minimize price impacts • ERCOT’s proposed solution at a high level is: 2- Prevent the block of energy at LSL injected by reliability resource from decreasing the prices • Introduce a price adder with an extra step in SCED to offset/wash-out the potential price reversal • Will compute prices without LSL impact of offline non-spin • Will compute normal dispatch solution with prices and base points • Difference in the two computations becomes the dynamic adder to all prices • LMP = system lambda –SF*(shadow price) + dynamic adder
Summary and other considerations… • In summary: • Mitigates the effect of LSL energy block deployment on prices • Allows the market to determine the prices dynamically • no administrative pricing • The mechanics of solving congestion do not change • Maintains existing operational deployment procedure, thus no degradation of reliability • ERCOT has not evaluated: • Technical feasibility and/or performance impacts to SCED • Protocol development required • Project cost and timeline for potential delivery not considered