1 / 13

Accreditation Climate Survey

Accreditation Climate Survey. MC GAP May 1, 2013. Overview. Administered Fall 2012 via email Directly linked to the Accreditation Standards Modeled from colleges who were reaffirmed for accreditation Self-Evaluation: Purpose to identify areas for improvement. Survey Participation.

ramona
Download Presentation

Accreditation Climate Survey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Accreditation Climate Survey MC GAP May 1, 2013

  2. Overview • Administered Fall 2012 via email • Directly linked to the Accreditation Standards • Modeled from colleges who were reaffirmed for accreditation • Self-Evaluation: Purpose to identify areas for improvement

  3. Survey Participation • 127 respondents to the survey in Fall 2012 • 56.7% Faculty (45.7% FT; 11% PT) • 30.7% Classified • 12.6% Administrators • Majority of respondents (56.7%) have worked at Mission for 10 or more years

  4. Highlights • Standard I: Institutional Effectiveness • The Good: Mission College has a clear and publicized mission that identifies its educational objectives. (85.8% Agree or Strongly Agree) • Area for Improvement: Integrated planning and budgeting for instruction, student support services, facilities, staffing, and technology are based upon qualitative and quantitative data. (20.8% Disagree or Strongly Disagree)

  5. Notable Group Responses Standard I • Fairly consistent across the 3 groups • Faculty had strongest agreement on clear and publicized mission statement • Classified and Faculty had higher levels of disagreement with statement that planning is based on data

  6. Highlights • Standard II: Student Learning Programs and Services • The Good: Students receive academic advising and personal counseling that support their educational and/or career goals. (78.9% Agree or Strongly Agree) • Area for Improvement: Student services are adequately staffed to meet student needs. (34.2% Disagree or Strongly Disagree)

  7. Notable Group Responses Standard II • Classified had greater levels of neutral and disagreement on staffing levels for student services • Administration highest response was “neutral” that programs and curricula are current • Faculty mostly agreed, but had somewhat higher “neutral” response that student needs are evaluated to provide support

  8. Highlights • Standard III: Resources • The Good: Mission College demonstrates its commitment to the significant educational role played by persons of diverse backgrounds by making positive efforts to encourage such diversity. (74.6% Agree or Strongly Agree) • Area for Improvement: The physical resources (e.g., layout, lighting, temperature control, furnishings) meet and enhance learning needs. (28.9% Disagree or Strongly Disagree)

  9. Notable Group Responses Standard III • Faculty and classified noted more neutral responses than any other that human resource planning is integrated with institutional planning • Classified noted more neutral responses on facilities and financial planning items

  10. Highlights • Standard IV: Leadership and Governance • The Good: There is effective (clear, current, and widely available) communication at the college. (64.3% Agree or Strongly Agree) • Area for Improvement:  There is a clear link of college goals to district goals and alignment with district process of budget development and resource allocation. (25.9% Disagree or Strongly Disagree)

  11. Notable Group Responses Standard IV • All groups identified neutral as the most common response on items related to the Chancellor and Board of Trustees

  12. Brainstorms! • Breakout to generate active responses for improvement • Part 1: Identify who are the key players to make a difference • Part 2: Brainstorm some concrete action steps

  13. Next Steps • Utilization of Brainstorms • Inform selection of Strategic Plan Year 2 Goals • Shared with groups to inform their activities • Future Surveys • True Climate Culture Survey • Every day language • Annual basis to track changes over time

More Related