240 likes | 1.1k Views
Tragedy. How can an art form which trades in human despair and desolation represent the deepest human value? (27). Eagleton, Terry. Sweet Violence: the idea of the Tragic . Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. Overview:. History of tragedy Three ‘modern’ theories of tragedy
E N D
Tragedy How can an art form which trades in human despair and desolation represent the deepest human value? (27). Eagleton, Terry. Sweet Violence: the idea of the Tragic. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003
Overview: • History of tragedy • Three ‘modern’ theories of tragedy • A few spices to pepper your essay with • Fitting King Lear to the theories Unfortunate perhaps but not tragic
The genre of tragedy • is rooted in the Greek dramas of Aeschylus (525-456 B.C. Oresteia and Prometheus Bound), Euripides (ca 480?-405 B.C., Medea and The Trojan Women) and Sophocles (496-406 B.C., e.g. Oedipus Rex and Antigone). • One of the earliest works of literary criticism, the Poetics of the Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322 B.C.), includes a discussion of tragedy based in part upon the plays of Aeschylus, Euripides, and Sophocles. While Shakespeare probably did not know Greek tragedy directly, he would have been familiar with the Latin adaptations of Greek drama by the Roman (i.e. Latin-language) playwright Seneca (ca. 3 B.C.-65 A.D; his nine tragedies include a Medea and an Oedipus). Both Senecan and Renaissance tragedy were influenced by the theory of tragedy found in Aristotle's Poetics. (on the next slide)
Classical Tragedy • According to Aristotle's Poetics, tragedy involves a protagonist ofhigh estate ("better than we") who falls from prosperity to misery through a series of reversals and discoveries as a result of a "tragic flaw or hamartia" generally an error caused by human frailty. Aside from this initial moral weakness or error, the protagonist is basically a good person: for Aristotle, the downfall of an evil protagonist is not tragic. • In Aristotelian tragedy, the action (or fable) generally involves • 1. revolution(unanticipated reversals of what is expected to occur) 2. discovery (in which the protagonists and audience learn something that had been hidden). 3. disasters, includes all destructive actions, deaths, etc. • Tragedy evokes pity and fear in the audience, leading finally to catharsis (the purgation / cleansing of these passions).
Medieval tragedy • A narrative (not a play) concerning how a person falls from high to low estate as the Goddess Fortune spins her wheel. In the middle ages, there was no "tragic" theatre per se; medieval theatre in England was primarily liturgical drama, which developed in the later middle ages (15th century) as a way of teaching scripture to the illiterate (mystery plays) or of reminding them to be prepared for death and God's Judgement (morality plays). Medieval "tragedy" was found not in the theatre but in collections of stories illustrating the falls of great men (e.g. Boccacio's Falls of Illustrious Men, Chaucer's Monk's Tale from the Canterbury Tales, and Lydgate's Falls of Princes). These narratives owe their conception of Fortune in part to the Latin tragedies of Seneca, in which Fortune and her wheel play a prominent role.
Renaissance tragedy • derives less from medieval tragedy (which randomly occurs as Fortune spins her wheel) than from the Aristotelian notion of the tragic flaw, a moral weakness or human error that causes the protagonist's downfall. • Unlike classical tragedy, however, it tends to include subplots and comic relief. From Seneca, early Renaissance tragedy borrowed the "violent and bloody plots, resounding rhetorical speeches, the frequent use of ghosts . . . and sometimes the five-act structure" (Norton Anthology of English Literature, 6th ed., vol. I, p. 410). • In his greatest tragedies (e.g. Hamlet, Othello, King Lear and Macbeth), Shakespeare transcends the conventions of Renaissance tragedy, imbuing his plays with a timeless universality.
A. C. Bradley (1851-1935)Shakespearean Tragedy (1904) • divides tragedy into an • exposition of the state of affairs; • the beginning, growth, and *vicissitudes (*shifts of fortune, changes) of the conflict; • and the final catastrophe or tragic outcome. Bradley emphasizes the Aristotelian notion of the tragic flaw: the tragic hero errs by action or omission; this error joins with other causes to bring about his ruin. According to Bradley, "This is always so with Shakespeare. The idea of the tragic hero as a being destroyed simply and solely by external forces is quite alien to him; and not less so is the idea of the hero as contributing to his destruction only by acts in which we see no flaw." Bradley's emphasis on the tragic flaw implies that Shakespeare's characters bring their fates upon themselves and thus, in a sense, deserve what they get. It should however be noted that in some of Shakespeare's plays (e.g. King Lear), the tragedy lies less in the fact that the characters "deserve" their fates than in how much more they suffer than their actions (or flaws) suggest they should.
Northrop Frye • distinguishes five stages of action in tragedy: • 1) Encroachment. Protagonist takes on too much, makes a mistake that causes his/her "fall." This mistake is often unconscious (an act blindly done, through over-confidence in one's ability to regulate the world or through insensitivity to others) but still violates the norms of human conduct. • 2) Complication. The building up of events aligning opposing forces that will lead inexorably to the tragic conclusion. "Just as comedy often sets up an arbitrary law and then organizes the action to break or evade it, so tragedy presents the reverse theme of narrowing a comparatively free life into a process of causation." • 3) Reversal. The point at which it becomes clear that the hero's expectations are mistaken, that his fate will be the reverse of what he had hoped. At this moment, the vision of the dramatist and the audience are the same. The classic example is Oedipus, who seeks the knowledge that proves him guilty of murdering his father and marrying his mother; when he accomplishes his objective, he realizes he has destroyed himself in the process. • 4) Catastrophe. The catastrophe exposes the limits of the hero's power and dramatizes the waste of his life. Piles of dead bodies remind us that the forces unleashed are not easily contained; there are also elaborate subplots (e.g. Gloucester in King Lear) which reinforce the impression of a world inundated with evil. • 5) Recognition. The audience (sometimes the hero as well) recognizes the larger pattern. If the hero does experience recognition, he assumes the vision of his life held by the dramatist and the audience. From this new perspective he can see the irony of his actions,
Ruth Nevo 1. Predicament In the first act the protagonist is presented with a difficult choice. Whatever option chosen is likely to have dire consequences. 2. Psychomachia As tension rises in Act 2, the protagonist is caught between two systems of value. 3. Reversal (perepeteia) During Act 3, the protagonist suffers a reversal of fortune. 4. Darkening Vision The tragic world-view suggests that the attainment of wisdom can only come through suffering. In Act 4, the protagonist achieves a fuller, more comprehensive understanding of the world. 5. Catastrophe. In the catastrophe, the worst possible outcome of the initial situation is realised, often through the death of the protagonist and others. The tragic error (hamartia) is a particular choice made by the protagonist which more or less seals his or her fate. In Nevo’s view, this error can occur in any act. In Shakespeare’s tragedies, it often occurs in the third act.
But a word of caution • The so-called tragic flaw, a modern invention based on a misreading of Aristotle, is a reductive moralizing of what the characters often know more complexly about themselves. Linked to tragic self-consciousness is a consciousness of the social or divine economies which limit, as they also in part define, the self; we’ll notice the tragic struggle between individual autonomy. And some some shaping force (providence, fate, the stars, the gods, nature, even theatre) which limits that autonomy. And we’ll notice that each of these generalisations about tragedy could also apply to comedy, where (for instance) characters also try to assert an autonomy which the plot sometimes gleefully denies them. (116) Danson, Lawrence. Shakespeare’s Dramatic Genres. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Eggleton, Terry: quotations • It is around this aporetic point, at which dispossession begins to blur into power, blindness into insight and victimage into victory, that a good deal of tragedy turns. (36) • The tragic hero renounce his particularity in order to express the universal, translating himself into that august sphere. (45)