1 / 16

Session 10: The ISPD2005 Placement Contest

Session 10: The ISPD2005 Placement Contest. Outline. Benchmark & Contest Introduction Individual placement presentation FastPlace, Capo, mPL, FengShui, APlace, NTUPlace, mFAR, Kraftwerk&Domino, Dragon2005 Result Announcement Conclusion & Future Work.

rance
Download Presentation

Session 10: The ISPD2005 Placement Contest

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Session 10:The ISPD2005 Placement Contest

  2. Outline • Benchmark & Contest Introduction • Individual placement presentation • FastPlace, Capo, mPL, FengShui, APlace, NTUPlace, mFAR, Kraftwerk&Domino, Dragon2005 • Result Announcement • Conclusion & Future Work

  3. The ISPD2005 Placement Contest and Benchmark Suite Gi-Joon Nam, Charles J. Alpert, Paul G. Villarrubia, Bruce Winter and Mehmet Yildiz IBM Corp.

  4. ISPD 2005 Placement Benchmark Suite

  5. ISPD 2005 Placement Benchmark Suite

  6. ISPD 2005 Placement Benchmark Suite

  7. ISPD 2005 Placement Benchmark Suite • Real industrial ASIC designs • Free space • 54% - 85% • Affects wire-length significantly • Macros • Wider distribution of cell sizes • I/Os: perimeter and area array I/Os • Various row configuration • Clock logic included

  8. ISPD 2005 Placement Contest • Open contest primarily for academic physical design community • Covers majority of placement tools • FastPlace, Capo, mPL, FengShui, APlace, NTUPlace, mFAR, Kraftwerk&Domino, Dragon2005 • Goals • To provide new modern placement benchmarks • To encourage to expose placement tools and results • To provide an educational forum on the state-of-the-art placement algorithms

  9. Contest Format • Each team is given 5 days to come up with the best results they can get • Fixed window of time • No limit on CPU resources • Quality metrics • Legality • Half-perimeter bounding box wire length • No timing metric • No congestion metric

  10. Contest Timeline • Jan. 12: Sample benchmarks released • Mar. 20: Contest benchmarks posted • Mar. 25: Solution submission due • Apr. 6: Results announcement

  11. Outline • Benchmark & Contest Introduction • Individual placement presentation • FastPlace, Capo, mPL, FengShui, APlace, NTUPlace, mFAR, Kraftwerk&Domino, Dragon2005 • Result Announcement • Conclusion & Future Work

  12. Wire-Length Results

  13. Conclusions & Future Works • New placement benchmark suite ISPD2005 • ISPD2005 Placement Contest • Better quality metrics for future contest • Routability & congestion

  14. adaptec2 Layout Figures

  15. adaptec2 Layout Figures

  16. adaptec2 Layout Figures

More Related