1 / 22

Outline of Paper

Voting in the 2011 Welsh Referendum: Nationalism, Valence or What? Richard Wyn Jones (Cardiff University) Roger Scully (Aberystwyth University) Annual Conference of the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties specialist group Exeter, September 2011. Outline of Paper. Introduction

rania
Download Presentation

Outline of Paper

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Voting in the 2011 Welsh Referendum: Nationalism, Valence or What?Richard Wyn Jones (Cardiff University)Roger Scully (Aberystwyth University)Annual Conference of the Elections, Public Opinion and Parties specialist groupExeter, September 2011

  2. Outline of Paper • Introduction • Background to the Referendum • The Campaign & the Result • Modelling the Vote: Hypotheses • Modelling the Vote: Main Findings • Conclusions & Implications

  3. But first, a word from our sponsors… • The 2011 Welsh Referendum Study (ESRC Grant RES-000-22-4496) • Survey-based study of voting in the referendum • Conducted via Internet with YouGov • Two-Wave panel study, with first wave conducted as ‘rolling’ study through period of the campaign • N of panel study = 2569 • Further support from McDougall Trust for interview-based study of local and national campaigning

  4. The Background, 1 • Previous devolution referendums: 1979, 1997 • 1998 GOWA: Flawed Devolution Model • ‘Secondary’ legislative powers: responsibility without power? • ‘Body Corporate’ and other problematic aspects • 2004: Richard Commission Report • 2006 GOWA: • LCOs • Provision for Referendum on full transfer of primary legislative powers

  5. Wales 2011: the Background, 2 • 2007: ‘One Wales’ Labour-Plaid coalition • 2008-09: All Wales Convention • BUT continuing caution… • ‘Shadow of 1979’: unwillingness to believe the survey evidence! • Labour parliamentary opposition • Final agreement on referendum: March 3rd 2011

  6. The Campaign: General Context • Problems created by nature of the issue at stake: • No fundamental issue of principle • Difficult for campaigns to craft messages • Difficult to frame intelligible and legally accurate referendum question • Problems with PPERA: • No official campaigns • Constraints on spending (2011 < 1997!)

  7. The Yes Campaign • Support from all four party leaderships in NAW • Also widespread support from civil society • The ‘Establishment’ campaign • Paradox of Yes position: Main strength also main weakness – constrained precisely because it was so all-inclusive • Had to ‘wait for Labour’ • Limited in what it could campaign against (not LCOs, not UK govt) • Main stake-holders had other priorities (particularly 2011 election)

  8. The Yes Campaign

  9. The No campaign • Little mainstream support, meaning… • Little ability to raise resources: spending c.£5k • No prominent politicians active. Resulting inexperience obvious in: • Breakdown in message discipline (increasingly arguing for abolition) • Seem to have believed own propaganda (polls) • Failure to produce promised campaign material • Local campaigns very weak • ‘Grassroots campaign’ largely without roots • Some of the spokesmen very weak • Welsh-speaking voices just plain embarrassing

  10. The No Campaign

  11. Referendum Voting Intention 2007-11

  12. Voting intentions across last 4 weeks of campaign (3-day rolling averages)

  13. The Result Yes: 517,132 (63.5%) No: 297,380 (36.5%) Turnout = 35.6%

  14. Turnout in major UK referendums ‘Border Referendum’, Northern Ireland, 1973 58.7% EC Membership, UK, 1975 64.5% Devolution, Scotland, 1979 63.8% Devolution, Wales, 1979 58.8% Devolution, Scotland, 1997 60.4% Devolution, Wales, 1997 50.1% Good Friday Agreement, Northern Ireland, 1998 81.0% Elected Mayor & GLA, London, 1998 34.1% Devolution, North East England, 2004 47.7% Devolution, Wales, 2011 35.6% AV Electoral Reform, UK, 2011 42.0%

  15. Modelling the Vote: Hypotheses Referendum voting choices shaped primarily by: • Politics of national recognition • ‘Performance politics’ • Party Cues • Constitutional Preferences

  16. Referendum Vote: National Identity

  17. Referendum Vote: WAG performance evaluations

  18. Referendum Vote: Party Support

  19. Referendum Vote: Constitutional Preference

  20. Why Did Wales Vote Yes? • No great impact of campaign • Not mainly about attitudes to major parties in government (London or Cardiff) or party leaders or performance of government • Not much about social differences (e.g. national identity or language) • Mainly about now-settled views concerning how Wales should be governed

  21. And to find out more… Richard Wyn Jones and Roger Scully, Wales Says Yes: Welsh Devolution and the 2011 Welsh Referendum (University of Wales Press, 2012)

More Related