1 / 11

DEMONSTRATING VALUE

DEMONSTRATING VALUE. Presentation to the Pathfinder Working Group 15 November 2001. INTRODUCTION. Customs’ context Key Issues for Customs Demonstrating Value Project Questions: Outcome vs Standard Piggy-back outcomes. CUSTOMS’ CONTEXT. Broad involvement...but narrow context

rashad
Download Presentation

DEMONSTRATING VALUE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DEMONSTRATING VALUE Presentation to the Pathfinder Working Group 15 November 2001

  2. INTRODUCTION • Customs’ context • Key Issues for Customs • Demonstrating Value Project • Questions: • Outcome vs Standard • Piggy-back outcomes

  3. CUSTOMS’ CONTEXT • Broad involvement...but narrow context • manage risks to 40 major policy objectives • on behalf of 20 agencies …..but only the border related risks • Integrating role…economies of scope • Variable quality of risk and intervention analysis

  4. KEY ISSUES FOR CUSTOMS • How to define our outcomes ? • Role of border intervention in risk mgt strategy? • How to link outputs to outcomes ?

  5. DEMONSTRATING VALUE PROJECT • DCRP grant • Objectives • Analytical techniques • Capability development

  6. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK • a theory to describes Customs’ reality and ultimately supports • strategic conversation between policy Ministries and NZCS • purchase conversation between NZCS and its Minister • purchase and/or value for money conversations between NZCS and Treasury • provides a basis for choosing the research questions needing to be answered

  7. BENCHMARKS • items which, if they change over time, affect level of residual risk and hence the outcome • at level low enough to aid operational management

  8. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY • Research methodology • define research questions • analyse gaps in knowledge & tools • select techniques to allow us to address 4 quadrants of conceptual framework and also to establish benchmark readings for a number of areas

  9. TECHNIQUES • Techniques will be both common and adapted • Suitability will be determined based on insights generated, ease of use, wider application etc

  10. QUESTIONS • Outcome vs Standard • Piggy-back outcomes • Externalities vs hidden outcomes

  11. Controlled Drugs (Indicative) Designationof controlled drugs Risk Treatment Strategy Border Control Policing/ Investigation Prosecution Rehabilitation Community Education

More Related