200 likes | 625 Views
A FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION (FAPE) and FAPE REVISITED . Sherrie Brown Special Education and the Law February 2, 2009. IDEA requires that. School Districts provide a FAPE to students who meet eligibility criteria: Children ages 3-21;
E N D
A FREE APPROPRIATE PUBLIC EDUCATION (FAPE) and FAPE REVISITED Sherrie Brown Special Education and the Law February 2, 2009
IDEA requires that • School Districts provide a FAPE to students who meet eligibility criteria: • Children ages 3-21; • Have one of 13 disabilities or a child ages 3-9 who experiences developmental delays; and • Require special education and related services in order to benefit from public education.
But what is FAPE? • Special education and related services that: • Are provided at public expense (FREE) • Meet the standards of the SEA • Include an appropriate education • Are provided in conformity with the IEP • Individually designed to meet the unique needs of each child • No specific further statutory or regulatory definition.
Bd. of Education of Hendrick Hudson Central SD v. Rowley, 458 U.S. 176 (1982) • FACTS • All about Amy…. • Courts below: • District Court said IDEA required that program maximize potential of the student • 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals said IDEA required child to have an opportunity to achieve her full potential commensurate with the opportunity offered other children. • ISSUES • What is the standard for judging whether a student’s education is in fact appropriate for him or her? • What is the standard for judicial review of lower court decision?
Rowley majority held that • IDEA does not require that schools maximize a child’s potential. • Basic floor of opportunity required by IDEA means access to specialized instruction and related services. • There must be personalized instruction with sufficient support to permit the child to benefit educationally. • Two-part test is to be used by courts to determine compliance: • Has the State compiled with the procedures? • Is the IEP reasonably calculated to allow the child to benefit from the program?
Measuring Educational Benefit • What is the student’s present skill? • What is the potential of the student? • Has the student made progress towards potential? • Footnote in Rowley – passing from grade to grade. • Look at whole experience—social, emotional, educational. • Balancing benefits—weighing everything in determining FAPE.
Subsequent court decisions… • Higher State Standard • Several states, such as NJ, have state FAPE standards that require more than Rowley. • More than de Minimus Educational Benefit • Standard applied by five circuit courts (not in 9th). • Meaningful Benefit • 9th Circuit (M.L. v. Federal Way SD, 387 F. 3d 1101 (9th Cir. 2004)).
FAPE Standard 25 years later… • 1997 amendments focused on educational (in regular education curriculum) results not just access—e.g., state goals and indicators for performance required. • 1997 amendments include goals of independence and economic self-sufficiency. • 2004 amendments include goals of preparing students for further education, improving academic achievement and functional performance, etc. • 2004 amendments changed slightly to align with NCLB—i.e., state must establish goals for performance that…
… • Promote the purposes of the IDEA, • Are the same as the state’s definition of AYP, • Address graduation rates and dropout rates, • Are consistent with any other goals and standards, • States must adopt performance indicators and measurable annual objectives for progress of children under NCLB, and • State must report annually to DOE.
Is FAPE (substantive benefit standard) evolving? • What does this mean???? • A characterization of the level of educational benefit required—in 9th Circuit this is meaningful (great significance or meaning). • The breadth of the concept of education—well established that it is comprehensive. • How or by what criteria the requisite level of educational benefit should be measured (i.e., graduation, grades, test scores, etc.)—individualized or case-by-case approach?
J.L. & M.L. v. MI School District, (W.D. Wa 2006)* • Federal District court held that ALJ was relying on ‘old’ law – i.e., Rowley standard– in determining adequacy of the IEP for the student. • That the standard, in fact, has changed to reflect evolving goals of IDEA—i.e., self-sufficiency, independent living and had ignored the student’s goals of higher education. • Remanded although language clearly indicates that under new standard, MI loses. * On appeal and argued at 9th Circuit in December 2008
Conclusion from the court… • The IDEA calls for disability education programs which guide the student toward post-education independence and self-sufficiency. • In pursuit of that goal, students such as K.L. must receive educational opportunities which significantly advance them towards that end. • The IEPs developed in accordance with this statutory scheme must specifically • delineate the methodologies to be used to achieve these goals, • the time to be allotted to each of the services employed to that end, and • further must be geared toward the achievement of enumerated goals. • Where a previous year’s IEP has fallen short of the marks it set, the succeeding IEPs must identify the means to advance the student further.
How can NCLB be used modify FAPE? • All students are to be included in the accountability that NCLB mandates—i.e, meet standards—is that the Rowley standard? • NCLB requires schools to use “scientifically based research” to support program decisions—for students with disabilities also. • NCLB requires minimum qualifications for paraprofessionals—for students with disabilities also.
FAPE and specific issues • Extended school day or year • Methodology in relation to FAPE • FAPE and Lovaas Treatment • LRE and FAPE • Seattle School District v. B.S.
So, please consider these… • Can parents waive rights to FAPE? • Does FAPE guarantee a certain level of achievement? • Does passing from grade to grade in regular education necessarily mean child is achieving FAPE? • If child with behavioral disabilities is achieving adequately in school, but not at home…is it FAPE? • Are procedural violations always the kiss of death? • Must school district provide nonacademic services/extracurricular activities in order to meet FAPE?