130 likes | 219 Views
IAM Group Meeting Federations. August 9, 2007. Federations. Otherwise independent entities that give up a certain degree of autonomy in order to achieve a common set of goals. Working together requires Common way to express meaning Agreed upon ways to convey information
E N D
IAM Group Meeting Federations August 9, 2007
Federations • Otherwise independent entities that give up a certain degree of autonomy in order to achieve a common set of goals. • Working together requires • Common way to express meaning • Agreed upon ways to convey information • Acceptable governance and trust models
Federations and Trust • Requires common Identity Provider (IdP) and Service Provider (SP) practices • Federation governance roles include • Establishing the rules • Overseeing compliance (e.g., audits) • Degrees of trust may be inherent/useful • Allows flexibility in IdP and SP services • When trust is violated • Liability and indemnification
If we do “it” right… • Simplified Usability for all collaborations • Home organizations carefully manage the release of personal information • On-line resource providers focus on the protection and authorization of use of their on-line resources.
Not all Federations are the same • Identity federations may have different rules, constraints, or laws on identity release • For example: FERPA is HE only • Some may choose to offer on-line services as well, or hold contracts for resources on behalf of members • Some are for specific business purposes or industries, etc.
InCommon Federation • Created to support Higher Education and its research and business partners • Federation operator is an LLC operated by Internet2 • Builds on existing campus identity management and single sign-on systems • Makes use of open industry standards (SAML) and open source federating software (Shibboleth)
InCommon Participation Requirements • Common descriptive information • Software Guidelines • http://www.incommonfederation.org/ops/softguide.html • Transparency of Policy and Practices • POP (Participant Operational Practices) • Participation Agreement • Minimal “bar” to enter • Limited Liability; No Indemnification • General Liability Insurance • Modest application and annual fee
eAuthentication Federation • Intended for all Federal agency outward facing applications • 24 agencies, 17 interface with HE • 600+ applications • Over 100 interface with HE • Created a matrix with all participating agencies, services, customers (who & how many), and LOA’s • Rewrote the business and operating rules
Linking InCommon & eAuthentication • Higher Ed is an important community for many Federal agency applications • Both have federations in place • Have been working together for > year • Compatible technology • Similar attributes • InCommon has richer set • InCommon & EAF include privacy protections
Interoperability - Technical • Information models must be compatible • Conversion may be difficult • Communication protocols • Gateways are hard • and may break trust models
Interoperability - Contractual • Governance sets community standards • May need to enhance or redefine somewhat • Must uphold inter-federation agreement • Responsible for trust between federations • May require stronger role within federation • May affect existing participation agreements • May incur new liabilities, etc. • Federation services might not interoperate