1 / 28

Transrectal Shear Wave Elastography of the Prostate: Initial Results and Potential Implications

Transrectal Shear Wave Elastography of the Prostate: Initial Results and Potential Implications. Richard G. Barr, M.D., Ph.D. Joseph R. Grajo, M.D. Prostate Cancer. Estimated new cases of prostate cancer in the US in 2010: 217,730

razi
Download Presentation

Transrectal Shear Wave Elastography of the Prostate: Initial Results and Potential Implications

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Transrectal Shear Wave Elastography of the Prostate: Initial Results and Potential Implications Richard G. Barr, M.D., Ph.D. Joseph R. Grajo, M.D.

  2. Prostate Cancer • Estimated new cases of prostate cancer in the US in 2010: 217,730 • Estimated deaths due to prostate cancer in the US in 2010: 32,050 • Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men, other than non-melanoma skin cancer • Second leading cause of cancer-related death in men in the US

  3. Prostate Cancer Diagnosis • Current diagnosis relies on digital rectal exam (DRE), prostate specific antigen level (PSA), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) • These techniques have limitations • PSA levels have a low positive predictive value for cancer • Shear wave elastography (SWE) has the potential to address these limitations and add to the current diagnostic workup [1, 2]

  4. Prostate Cancer Diagnosis • PSA selects who needs a biopsy. Only 25-30% are positive on biopsy. • Conventional Ultrasound, Color Doppler, MRI, MR Spectroscopy have limitations • CEUS may have better detection rates than other tests • Confidence in a negative biopsy with elevated or rising PSAs is low, often requiring patients to have multiple biopsies

  5. Goals for test • Detect the foci of cancer with high sensitivity • Guide a biopsy to suspicious areas • Be able to guide the biopsy to the most suspicious area to obtain the best Gleason score • Be able to exclude cancer with high specificity --? eliminate the need for a biopsy

  6. Screening • To detect clinically significant prostate cancer in asymptomatic men at an early stage where curative therapy can be used • Annual DRE and PSA for men over 50 • Problem: SIGNIFICANT prostate cancer • 30% of men at age 50 have foci of prostate cancer in necropsy studies

  7. Anatomy • 3 “Zones” • Peripheral 70% • Central 25% • Transitional 5% Kundra V.,et al. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;189:830-844

  8. Elastography • Initial evaluation of the prostate with transrectal shear wave elastography (SWE) determined the following: • Imaging is improved in the transverse plane as opposed to the sagittal plane • The central zone and transitional zones are complex, deep, and often with calcifications, making interpretation difficult • The peripheral zone lends itself to excellent imaging

  9. Aims • To determine if SWE of the prostate can lead to higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting cancer • To determine if SWE can increase the negative predictive value for prostate cancer screening and better direct image-guided biopsy

  10. Technique • The field of view for SWE is too small to image the entire gland • We scan the right from base to apex followed by the left from base to apex • Limit pre-compression • Wait a few seconds at each imaging plane for image to build

  11. Methods • Patients scheduled for TRUS biopsy with an elevated PSA and/or abnormal DRE were asked to participate in the IRB approved study • TRUS was performed with B-mode and color Doppler imaging

  12. Methods • SWE was then performed using a SE12-3 probe on a SuperSonic Imagine (SSI) system • Nodules and other suspicious areas were noted by the radiologist • Afterwards, the urologist performed a DRE, scanned with B-mode ultrasound, and performed sextant biopsy based on standard clinical practice without knowledge of the SWE findings

  13. Methods • Any abnormalities on B-mode alone were also biopsied per standard protocol • If abnormalities on SWE were not included in the original biopsy, additional samples of these areas were obtained after the completion of standard biopsy • The prostate was divided into sextants for analysis • SWE was deemed positive if the area was greater than 35 kPa, negative if less than 20 kPa, and borderline if 20-35 kPa

  14. Methods • B-mode nodules were documented and correlated with SWE values • SWE and biopsy results were compared for each sextant • Biopsies were staged based on the Gleason score (scale of 2-10) September 2001 Radiology, 220, 757-764.

  15. Gleason Score • Interpreted by pathologist from prostate biopsy specimen • Based on microscopic tumor patterns (degree of loss of normal glandular tissue architecture) • http://gleasonscore.net/ http://www.prostate-cancer.org/pcricms/node/165

  16. Gleason Score • Summation of primary and secondary grades • Grades scored on a scale of 1 to 5 • 1 = cancer resembling normal prostatic tissue • 5 = no identifiable glandular tissue • Primary grade represents the majority of the tumor • Secondary grade represents minority of the tumor • Total “Gleason Score” (or sum) is calculated with a range of 2 to 10, with a higher score conferring worse prognosis • http://gleasonscore.net/ http://www.prostate-cancer.org/pcricms/node/165

  17. Shear Wave Imaging • Measurement of elasticity is expressed as Young’s Modulus (kPa) and displayed on a color scale • In the areas without color, the shear wave is not generated and therefore the elasticity is not measured

  18. Advantages of Shear Wave • Patient presented with a hypoechoic nodule on US (black lesion with arrow) • SWE was performed and the nodule was found to be of low stiffness (<20kPa). Note the blue area with the yellow arrow. • However, another lesion was found with a high stiffness (75kPa) and was found upon biopsy to be a Gleason grade 7 prostate cancer. Note the red lesion with the red arrow.

  19. Results • A total of 32 patients participated in the study, providing 192 sextants • Average patient age was 64.2 years (range 53-79) • Average PSA was 5.05 (range 0.21-18.6). A total of 14 foci of cancer were detected in 7 of the 32 patients (22%)

  20. Results • Based on the SWE findings, 173/178 sextants were true negatives • 14/14 sextants were true positives • There were 5 false positives and 0 false negatives. This produced a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 97%, positive predictive value of 74%, and negative predictive value of 100%

  21. Benign Prostate • Recent elevation of PSA from 8 to 12.3 • Homogeneous blue reading indicates uniform low stiffness (< 20kPa), likely ruling out carcinoma

  22. Benign Nodule

  23. True Positive (Gleason 6 CA) • Low PSA but firm left side on DRE • B-mode imaging and Color Doppler unremarkable • Shear wave elastography demonstrates a posterior high stiffness lesion on the left side, measuring 119kPa • Confirmed on biopsy to be a Gleason 6 carcinoma

  24. Malignant Nodule (Gleason 6)

  25. False Positive • Stiff (73kPa) and echogenic lesion that suggested malignancy. Note the posterior red lesion circled. • Upon biopsy it was found to be benign prostatic tissue that had been calcified • Current limitation of SWE

  26. False Positive • High (67kPa) stiffness nodule noted on SWE. Note the posterior yellow-orange area circled. • Found on biopsy to be inflamed prostatic tissue with focal calcifications

  27. Conclusion • Transrectal shear wave elastography of the prostate has the potential to become the primary imaging modality for detection of prostate cancer • With a high negative predictive value, this technique could eliminate a significant number of biopsies

  28. References • [1] Bercoff J. “ShearWave Elastography.” Supersonic Imagine White Paper. October 2008. • [2] Correas JM, Khairoune A, Tissier AM, et al. “Trans-rectal quantitative shear wave elastography: application to prostate cancer – a feasibility study.” Proceedings of the European Congress of Radiology, 2011. • Kundra V, et al. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2007;189:830-844 • Kuligowska E, et al. Radiology, September 2001;220, 757-764 • http://www.prostate-cancer.org/pcricms/node/165 • http://gleasonscore.net/

More Related