1 / 25

Implementation of MEHM-items in HIS in Denmark (MEHM=Minimum European Health Module)

This study aims to analyze the concurrent validity of MEHM questions and their implementation in the Danish National Health Interview Surveys. Data from surveys conducted in 1987, 1994, and 2000 were linked with registries for verification. The study examines MEHM rates, longstanding illness, perceived health, global activity restriction, mortality rates, and admission rates.

rebal
Download Presentation

Implementation of MEHM-items in HIS in Denmark (MEHM=Minimum European Health Module)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Implementation of MEHM-items in HIS in Denmark(MEHM=Minimum European Health Module) Niels Kr. Rasmussen Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  2. Implementation of MEHM-items in HIS in Denmark(MEHM=Minimum European Health Module) • Aim • To analyse concurrent validity of MEHM-questions • Data • Danish National Health Interview Surveys • 1987: sample size 5000 • 1994: sample size 5000 • 2000: sample size 17000 • Linkage with registries (inpatient and cause of death registry) Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  3. MEHM rates Denmark 1987-2000 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  4. Longstanding illness, Denmark Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  5. Good perceived health, Denmark Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  6. Global activity restriction, Denmark Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  7. Percentage with longstanding illness, females, 2000 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  8. Percentage with longstanding illness, males, 2000 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  9. Good perceived health, females, 2000 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  10. Good perceived health, males, 2000 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  11. Global activity restriction and climbing stairs, males, 1987 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  12. Global activity restriction and climbing stairs, females, 1987 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  13. 10-year mortality rate, all causes, males, baseline 1987 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  14. 10-year mortality rate, all causes, females, baseline 1987 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  15. 10-year mortality rate, all causes, males, baseline 1987 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  16. 10-year mortality rate, all causes, females, baseline 1987 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  17. 10-year mortality rate, all causes, males, baseline 1987 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  18. 10-year mortality rate, all causes, females, baseline 1987 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  19. 3-year admission rate (all causes), females, baseline 1994 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  20. 3-year admission rate (all causes), males, baseline 1994 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  21. 3-year admission rate (all causes), males, baseline 1994 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  22. 3-year admission rate (all causes), females, baseline 1994 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  23. 3-year admission rate (all causes), males, baseline 1994 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  24. 3-year admission rate (all causes), females, baseline1994 Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

  25. Conclusion • Expected correlations • Good concurrent validity • MEHM questions capture different dimensions Ottawa 9.-10. January 2003

More Related