1 / 20

Organization Name Organization Site CMM Assessment Final Findings

Organization Name Organization Site CMM Assessment Final Findings. Date of final presentation. CMM Software Process Assessment Final Presentation. Scope of the assessment process Ratings Strengths noted Findings Recommendations Next Steps. Assessment Team. Team Leader: Name, Org

redford
Download Presentation

Organization Name Organization Site CMM Assessment Final Findings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Organization NameOrganization SiteCMM AssessmentFinal Findings Date of final presentation

  2. CMM Software Process AssessmentFinal Presentation • Scope of the assessment process • Ratings • Strengths noted • Findings • Recommendations • Next Steps

  3. Assessment Team • Team Leader: Name,Org • Team Member: Name,Org • Team Member: Name,Org • Team Member: Name,Org

  4. Scope of the Assessment • Participated in discussions during assessment: • # Managers • # Project Leaders • # Functional Area Representatives

  5. Rating System(s) Explanations CMM • Satisfied: • The organization’s practices associated with the CMM component are implemented and institutionalized either as defined in the CMM or with an adequate alternative. • Not satisfied • There are significant weaknesses in the organization’s implementation and institutionalization of practices associated with the CMM component, as defined, and no adequate alternative is in place • Not applicable • The CMM practices associated with the CMM component are not applicable in the organization environment

  6. QSR Rating System(s) Explanations • World Class: • The organization’s excellent practices associated with the CMM component are recognized and benchmarked outside the organization ( 9.0 to 10) • Qualified: • The organization’s practices associated with the CMM component are implemented and institutionalized either as defined in the CMM or with an adequate alternative. (8.0 to 8.9) • Marginally Qualified • The organization’s practices associated with the CMM component are largely being implemented however there are a few deficiencies (6.0 to 7.9) • Not Qualified • There are significant weaknesses in the organization’s implementation and institutionalization of practices associated with the CMM component, as defined, and no adequate alternative is in place (0 to 5.9) • Not Assessed • The CMM practices associated with the CMM component are not assessed in the organization environment

  7. Important Facts about the Assessment Results • Findings in a KPA does not mean that the KPA is not satisfied or qualified • Findings, Strengths, and Recommendations are based on the observations of the assessment team and the information presented and provided to them

  8. Ratings of CMM Assessment • The CMM level is: Level 3 3 A MAJOR ACHIEVEMENT!

  9. Strengths Noted (1)

  10. Strengths Noted (2)

  11. Final Findings • List KPAs with findings

  12. Final Findings KPA

  13. Recommendations (1 of 2)

  14. Recommendations (2 of 2)

  15. KPAs Maturity level 2 Fully Satisfied Repeatable KPAs Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3 Goal 4 Requirements management Project planning Project tracking and oversight Software subcontract management Software quality assurance Configuration management Not Satisfied NotApplicable

  16. KPAs Maturity level 3 Defined KPAs Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3 Goal 4 Organization process focus Organization process definition Training program Integrated software management Software product engineering Intergroup coordination Peer reviews Fully Satisfied Not Satisfied Not Applicable

  17. KPAs Maturity level 4 Managed KPAs Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3 Goal 4 Quantitative Process Management Software Quality Management Fully Satisfied Not Satisfied Not Applicable

  18. KPAs Maturity level 5 Optimizing KPAs Goal 1 Goal 2 Goal 3 Goal 4 Defect Prevention Technology Change Management Process Change Management Fully Satisfied Not Satisfied Not Applicable

  19. Next Steps • All unsatisfied goals assessed have findings • Actions to address all findings must be included in the overall QSR Action Plan (AP) • After completing the assessment, the assessed organization will need to include action items in the AP for all findings. The goal is to move the organization (a minimum of) two SEI Levels higher than the level they were assessed at, as follows: • Level 1 to Level 3, Level 2 to Level 4, Level 3 and above to Level 5 • When the Action Plans are submitted to the lead assessors, they will verify and ensure that all findings have associated action items

  20. THANK YOU (VERY MUCH!) • The assessment team would like to express their appreciation to the participants, site coordinators and others within the organization for the dedication and cooperation in making this a successful QSR S10 assessment.

More Related