60 likes | 129 Views
Updates on Preliminary Beam Loss Estimates and Layout with Tilted Plasma Cell. Beam losses. Beam loss detection: BLMs along the line (critical locations: aperture bottlenecks)
E N D
Updates on Preliminary Beam Loss Estimates and Layout with Tilted Plasma Cell C. Bracco
Beam losses Beam loss detection: • BLMs along the line (critical locations: aperture bottlenecks) • BLMs in the experimental area (up and downstream of the plasma cell + dump region) we need a better knowledge of beam at the exit of the plasma cell detailed FLUKA studies. • Existing BCT at the beginning of the line (TT60) + BCT at the end of the line Beam losses • Normal operation: • No losses along the line (TT61, TT4 and TT5) • Accident scenario: • 1 nominal bunch (3E11 p+), interlock on BLM + magnets current (dipole and quadrupole) C. Bracco
Tilted Plasma Cell Beam divergence (A. Petrenko) Exit of plasma cell Large divergence difficult to focus the beam bend primary beam and tilt plasma cell (proton beam and laser still parallel to plasma cell axis) 0.45 mrad 5 m for beam diagnostic and spectrometer Muons angular distribution downstream of the dump: 87 mrad >> beam divergence plasma cell tilted by 87 mard (~5°) C. Bracco
Beam Line Towards Plasma Cell in TT4-TT5 450 GeV p+ Br = 1503 T m Normal conducting magnets: B = 1.6 T (1.8 T is close to saturation) L = (q * Br) / B q = 5° L = 82 m only for bends!! L ha~ 3.6 m !! q = 5° hb TT61 TT4 + TT5 dump C. Bracco
Plasma Cell H= ha+hb = 5 m Impossible! 10 m long plasma cell hb~1.3 m ~5 m for Spectrometer and diagnostics 0.5 m dump C. Bracco
Beam line Towards Plasma Cell in TT4-TT5 H = 2.5 m (?) ha = 1 m L = 23 m B = (q * Br) / L B = 5.7 T possible only with superconducting magnets! L ha~ 1 m q = 5° TT61 TT4 + TT5 dump C. Bracco