1 / 15

1983 A Nation at Risk

1983 A Nation at Risk. Elizabeth Angeloff. Objectives. What was A Nation at Risk ? Who was behind A Nation at Risk What were the indicators of risk? What were the recommendations for improvement?. What was a Nation at Risk?.

rene
Download Presentation

1983 A Nation at Risk

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 1983 A Nation at Risk Elizabeth Angeloff

  2. Objectives • What was A Nation at Risk? • Who was behind A Nation at Risk • What were the indicators of risk? • What were the recommendations for improvement?

  3. What was a Nation at Risk? • The 1983 report from the National Commission on Excellence in Education • Compiled over 18 months • Purpose • Define the problems afflicting American Education • Provide Solutions. Not scapegoats.

  4. Who was behind A Nation at Risk? • President Ronald Reagan • T.H. Bell • Secretary of Education • National Commission on Excellence in Education • 18 members • Private Sector • Government • Education

  5. Ronald Reagan’s Speech • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmQXx-DEBRM

  6. What were the Indicators of Risk • Low rankings on academic tests compared to other industrialized nations • SAT scores declined from 1963-1980. • Verbal fell 50 points • Math fell 40 points • Nearly 40% of 17 year olds could not draw inferences from written material • Increase in remedial math courses at 4 year colleges

  7. Indicators of Risk cont… • Average tested achievement of students graduating from college is lower. • Business and military leaders complain that they are required to spend millions of dollars on costly remedial education

  8. Recommendations for Improvement • Five Categories • Content • Standards and Expectations • Time • Teaching • Leadership and Fiscal Support

  9. Content • Specific standards of learning in: • Math • English • Science • Social studies • Computer science. • High School curriculum should include: • Fine arts • Performing Arts • Vocational Education • Revising, updating, improving and making available new divers curriculum

  10. Standards and Recommendation • 4-year colleges should raise admission requirements • Inflated grades • Standardized tests administered at major transition points • Textbooks and tools of learning upgraded • New instructional materials should reflect current applications of technology

  11. Time • Instruction in effective study and work skills • 7 hour school days • 200 day school years • Improved classroom management and organization • Grouping students based on academic progress, not age

  12. Teaching • People preparing to teach should meet high educational standards • Salaries increased • Performance based • Master teachers involved in designing teacher prep programs

  13. Leadership and Fiscal Support • State/local officials have primary responsibility for financing • Federal government have primary responsibility to identify national interests in education • Educators, parents and public have the responsibility to assist in bringing about the reform

  14. Discussion • Are we still “A Nation at Risk”? • What are recommendations for improvement that can be implemented now?

  15. References • Gardner, David. (1983). A Nation at Risk. Retrieved from http://datacenter.spps.org/ uploads/SOTW_A_Nation_at_Risk_1983.pdf • Oliver, Kent. (2013, May 17). A Nation at Risk Clip [video file]. Retrieved from http:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmQXx-DEBRM

More Related