1 / 18

The use of animals

The use of animals. www.psychlotron.org.uk. Constraints on the use of animals Arguments for and against their use in psychological research Practical Moral & ethical. The use of animals. www.psychlotron.org.uk. Many pitfalls for the unwary:

rhett
Download Presentation

The use of animals

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The use of animals www.psychlotron.org.uk • Constraints on the use of animals • Arguments for and against their use in psychological research • Practical • Moral & ethical

  2. The use of animals www.psychlotron.org.uk • Many pitfalls for the unwary: • Unsubstantiated assertion e.g. animals feel as much pain as humans • Naïve assumptions e.g. animal researchers do it because they’re evil and they enjoy it • Irrelevance e.g. writing about medical, surgical or cosmetic research, not psychological investigations

  3. The use of animals www.psychlotron.org.uk • Many examples are possible, from many different areas e.g.: • Developmental (maternal deprivation) • Physiological (stress, sleep) • Abnormal (drug treatments) • Try to select a variety to show synopticity

  4. Constraints on use www.psychlotron.org.uk • Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act • Licensing & inspection • Constraints on numbers & species • Requirements for suitable facilities • Competence & qualification requirements

  5. Constraints on use www.psychlotron.org.uk • BPS guidelines on animal research • Specific application to psychology • Requirement for humane treatment • Requirement to consider alternatives • Cost benefit analysis

  6. Arguments for www.psychlotron.org.uk • Practical arguments (is it useful?) • Continuity • Convenience • Usefulness • Ethical arguments (is it moral?) • Utilitarianism • Duty to species

  7. Continuity www.psychlotron.org.uk • We share common ancestry with other animals (Darwin, 1859) • Basic similarities in physiological structure & functioning • Behavioural similarities with some species (e.g. primates) • Animal research therefore gives valid information about human processes

  8. Convenience www.psychlotron.org.uk • Animals can be used in ways humans can’t • Short lifespans & breeding cycles enable inheritance to be studied • Behaviour can be controlled and monitored in ways impossible with people • Less reactivity

  9. Usefulness www.psychlotron.org.uk • Animal research is demonstrably useful to psychologists • Knowledge of nervous system structure & functioning • Understanding of stress, abnormal behaviour, sleep… • Our understanding of human behaviour would be very limited if not for animal research

  10. Ethical arguments www.psychlotron.org.uk • Utilitarian • The suffering of a small number of animals is justified because it helps a large number of people • Moral duty • We have a moral obligation to our own species to advance knowledge and reduce suffering. Animal research is justified if it furthers this (Gray, 1991)

  11. Other points www.psychlotron.org.uk • The constraints on the use of animals protect animals sufficiently and prevent unnecessary suffering • This is shown by: • Reduction in number and range of animals used in labs • Increase in non-invasive & field-based studies

  12. Arguments against www.psychlotron.org.uk • Counterarguments to those presented in favour of animal research • Discontinuity or continuity? • Ecological validity • Generalisability • Moral arguments

  13. Discontinuity or continuity? www.psychlotron.org.uk • Points out an inconsistency in continuity argument • If other animals are so similar to us they should be afforded the same ethical considerations as us • Or, if they are so different from us, then generalisation is of questionable value

  14. Ecological validity www.psychlotron.org.uk • Questions the value of the data obtained from animal studies • Lab based animal studies produce unnatural behaviour (e.g. drug addiction studies) • Field studies disturb the environment & consequently, behaviour

  15. Generalisability www.psychlotron.org.uk • Suggests that even when data are valid, they can’t be applied to humans • Differences in human and animal evolution & genes • Structural differences in nervous system (e.g. cerebral cortex) • Influence of language, culture, higher cognitive processes

  16. Moral arguments www.psychlotron.org.uk • Utilitarianism gives human suffering priority over animal suffering – this is a form of discrimination (speciesism; Singer, 1975) • Animals have rights as people do. We have a moral obligation to protect them. No amount of regulation can justify animal research

  17. Other points www.psychlotron.org.uk • Safeguards are difficult to enforce; abuses may be undetected • Cost benefit analyses as required by guidelines easily skewed in favour of research • The fact that you never know in advance the outcome of research means that some will always be useless

  18. Conclusions www.psychlotron.org.uk • These are up to you, but make sure you… • Look at both sides • Present a balanced argument • Use suitable examples to support your claims

More Related