1 / 24

Rapid Assessment Program – CI (Center for Applied Biodiversity Science)

Rapid Assessment Program – CI (Center for Applied Biodiversity Science). http://www.conservation.org. Created in 1990 3 – 4 week intensive biodiversity surveys Terrestrial, freshwater and Marine Focus on hotspots and wilderness areas of the world

rian
Download Presentation

Rapid Assessment Program – CI (Center for Applied Biodiversity Science)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Rapid Assessment Program – CI(Center for Applied Biodiversity Science) http://www.conservation.org • Created in 1990 • 3 – 4 week intensive biodiversity surveys • Terrestrial, freshwater and Marine • Focus on hotspots and wilderness areas of the world • Provide reports in English and the local language

  2. What are important patterns of biodiversity at the species level? • What are important biodiversity processes at the species level?

  3. Landscape Scale • Components/Pieces ? • # patch types • # ecoregions • # watersheds • Function/Process ? • Locations and rate of disturbances • Rate of transfer of nutrients or species across patches • Structure/patterns ? • Fragmentation stats • Road density • Patch size frequency distribution • Burn history

  4. What happens when we can’t comprehensively measure biodiversity? • Flagship • Umbrella • Keystone • Endemics • Indicator

  5. Is an indicator species approach effective ?

  6. Lawton et al 1998 Nature 1998 391:72-75. • Are there correlations of species richness between taxonomic groups? • Extensive inventories within the Mbalmayo Reserve, S. Central Cameroon • Surveyed: Birds, butterflies, flying beetles, canopy beetles, canopy ants, Leaf-litter ants, termites, and soil nemotodes • Habitat types: Near primary, old-growth secondary, Partial manual clearance plus plantation, Partial mechanical clearance plus plantation, complete clearance with young plantation, manually cleared farm fallow (1 – 3 ha plots)

  7. Lawton et al 1998 • Conclusions • No single group was good indicator of species richness in all groups • Number of positive significant correlations was very low and some correlations were negative • Strongly questions the usefulness of indicator taxa • Highlights the difficulty associated with surveying a small number of taxa (high “scientist hours” and many morphospecies, 12 systematists)

  8. Study from Textbook (Lamoreux et al 2006)

  9. Global Patterns of Biodiversity

  10. General Patterns ? • Species diversity tends to decreases w/ • Increasing latitude • Increasing altitude • Some ecosystems more diverse than others • Tropical rainforest • Coral reefs • Many hypotheses to explain patterns, no clear consensus

  11. How do we prioritize?

  12. Hotspots • Definition (Myers 1988; Myers et al. 2000) • Area must contain 0.5% (~1500) of the world’s plant spp as endemics AND • Must have lost at least 70% of its primary vegetation • Primary conservation strategy of Conservation International

  13. World’s Hotspots (Myers et al. 2000) Biodiversityhotspots.org

  14. Hotspot Statistics • 34 hotspots • Total extent 15.7% of Earth’s land surface • 50% of Earth’s total plant spp are endemic to hotspots • 42% of terrestrial vertebrate spp are endemic to hotspots • 86% of this area has been degraded

  15. Hotspot Importance • Last 15 years >$750 million

  16. Importance of Ecoregions

  17. Olson et al. 2001 • World Wildlife Fund • Delineated 867 ecoregions (now 825) • “Relatively large units of land containing a distinct assemblage of natural communities and species, with boundaries that approximate the original extent of natural communities prior to major land-use change”

  18. Class Discussion • How is the ecoregion concept an improvement over traditional biodiversity-mapping schemes? • What are the weaknesses of this approach? • How can an ecoregion approach be useful in conservation planning? • Does an ecoregion approach help preserve components (pieces) and function (process)?

  19. World’s Ecoregions http://www.nationalgeographic.com/wildworld/

  20. Brooks et al. 2006 Science 313:58 • 9 Major Biodiversity Prioritization Strategies

  21. Brooks et al. 2006

More Related