150 likes | 165 Views
Assessment of the Fall 2008 Residence Life Plan implementation by the Faculty Senate with emphasis on voluntary participation, respect for personal beliefs, and social opportunities for students.
E N D
Student Life Committee of theFaculty Senate Assessment of Implementation of Fall 2008 Residence Life Plan
Charge of the Committee • To Assess the implementation of the Fall 2008 Residence Life Plan approved by the Faculty Senate in the Spring of 2008. • Methodology • Open Forums in Residence Halls & Student Centers • Questions on Resident Hall Survey • Focus group with Residents
Open Forums • George Reed • Staff Welcoming • Programs Voluntary • Privacy and rights respected • Programs not helpful in development as college student • Limited socialization opportunities • Perkins Student Center • Rodney Complex
I understand that attending residence hall programs is voluntary. (55.5%) (36.7%) (5.8%) (1.4%) (0.6%)
When I participated in residence hall programs or activities, I felt my personal beliefs, opinions, and values were respected. (27.9%) (34.7%) (34.5%) (2.1%) (0.8%)
Residence Life staff members respect my personal beliefs, opinions, values, and privacy. (41.9%) (38.6%) (17.1%) (1.9%) (0.6%)
As a result of Residence Life efforts (e.g. bulletin boards, recycling bins, energy use reminders, etc.) I learned more about environmental sustainability. (16.3%) (37.5%) (26.5%) (12.9%) (6.9%)
Residence hall activities such as intramurals, pizza parties, movie nights, dances and ice cream socials provided many opportunities for me to meet other students. (16.8%) (34.7%) (30.5%) (11.7%) (6.3%)
Residence Life staff members have created a welcoming atmosphere in my residence hall. (34.6%) (43.2%) (15.2%) (5.5%) (1.5%)
Residence Hall programs provided a supportive environment for my academic success. (19.1%) (36.2%) (32.3%) (9.2%) (3.2%)
Residence Hall programs informed me and contributed to my personal development as an individual. (13.5%) (26.6%) (40.1%) (12.5%) (7.3%)
Residence Life promoted a safe living environment. (39.9%) (44.1%) (13.3%) (2.2%) (0.7%)
Focus Groups • Responses support data collected via the online survey in regards to: • Voluntary • Respecting views • Environmental Sustainability
Focus Group • Suggestions • Continue and increase funding for the social events. • More competitive events between floors (e.g. Door decorating) Not just sports. • Promote interaction in the suite environment • More unique educational events. • Listen to needs and interests of residence and offer programs to meet those needs. • Respect difference across dorms • Class • Types of Dorms • Promote informal interaction by resident assistant with residents.
Overall Findings • Does not appear the major concerns from last year were evident in the Fall • Voluntary • Respect of Views • Environmental Sustainability • More Focus on the social experience for residents and more funds available for such programs. • Offer programs in which students are interested. • High “No Opinion” Responses