1 / 30

Mortality transition in Mexico, 1500-2000

Trace Mexico's mortality transition from colonial times to the modern era, exploring key factors like public health, medicine, and education that contributed to rising life expectancy. Discover the impact of epidemics, wars, and social changes on Mexico's population health over five centuries.

rloveday
Download Presentation

Mortality transition in Mexico, 1500-2000

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mortality transition in Mexico, 1500-2000 • 1500-1650: life expectancy worsened with Christian colonization: e0 < 20, fell as low as 5 years during worst times! • 1650-1810: slow recovery punctuated by epidemics and famine, e0 ~15-25 years • 1810-1920: significant improvements undermined by decades of war—1810-20, 1846-68, 1910-20 • 1920: sustained rise in life expectancy

  2. Mexico: life expectancy at birth over five centuries

  3. Five centuries of population change in Mexico (millions log scale)

  4. 6 Factors to explain the health transition and rising life expectancy • 1. Public health • 2. Medicine • 3. Wealth and income • 4. Nutrition • 5. Behavior • 6. Education

  5. The epidemiological transition, 3 stages (Omran) • 1. Pandemics • 2. Receding pandemics • 3. Degenerative diseases

  6. Mexico: the last devasting epidemic occurred in 1918 (~250,000 deaths) • *Huey zahuatl (smallpox) 1520 • *tepitonzahuatl (measles) 1531 • cocoliztli (Mexican typhus?) 1546-47 • matlazahuatl (typhus?) 1576-77 • famine and typhus 1692 • typhus 1737-39 • the great hunger 1786-88 • typhus 1813 • *cholera 1833 • *influenza 1918 * = virgin soil epidemic

  7. The Age of Pestilence and Famine: Colonial Mexico, 1640-1813

  8. Example from Northern Mexico, 1630-1930

  9. Intensity of mortality crises declined after mid-19th century

  10. The revolution in life expectancy in 20th century Mexico Civil war, 1910-17

  11. The Mortality transition in Mexico:catching up with the USA

  12. Omran’s epidemiological transitionMexico, cause of death: decline of parasitic, contagious; rise of circulatory, cancer, accidents % of deaths by cause (other = ~25%) parasitic accidents/ yearinfectiouscirculatoryrespiratorydigestcancerhomicides 1930 47.0 1.9 16.0 4.0 0.7 4.1 1940 43.1 3.7 20.0 4.7 1.2 5.1 1950 34.6 6.2 20.7 5.1 2.0 5.9 1960 25.6 8.5 19.3 5.3 3.4 6.5 1970 23.1 10.5 21.8 5.6 4.0 7.2 1980 13.7 16.4 13.5 7.1 6.5 15.5 1990 9.7 19.8 10.5 7.9 10.1 13.9

  13. Timing of principal gains by age varied greatly from one decade to another. Age: timing of gain 50+: 1943-60; 1983+ 15-49: 1930-60, 1983+ 5-14: 1930-60 1-4: 1930-80 Civil war, 1910-17 0: since 1940

  14. 6 factors for explaining the health transition and rising life expectancy: the case of Mexico • 1. Public health—substantial efforts from 1919 • 2. Education—from the 1940s • 3. Nutrition—improved significantly only from 1950s • 4. Medicine—important since the 1950s • 5. Behavior—deaths from violence (homicides) dropped substantially in the 1960s, but accidents rose sharply • 6. Wealth and income—only since the 1970s

  15. Public health insurance has risen steady since 1950 & now covers 60%+ of the population Year Population (millions) % insured • 1940 20 <1% • 1950 26 4 • 1960 35 11 • 1970 48 25 • 1980 67 46 • 1990 81 59

  16. Literacy (aged 10+) doubled 1900-30 and 1930-80

  17. Mexico won the race between population and grain supply, 1925-1985

  18. Mexican agriculture won the race against population--1940-65 population corn wheat

  19. Food availability increase per capita by type: Mexico 1940-1960, 1960-1975

  20. 2000 1990 1970 Social modernization in Mexico, 1970-2000

  21. Mexican middle class emerged slowly—since 1950

  22. Infant mortality declined from 13% in 1950 to 2.5% in 2005 (still more than 3 times the US rate of 0.7%).

  23. 6 significant infant mortality risks in Mexico, 1987-1991: base = 10/1000 • 1. Mother less than 7 years of schooling 2.3x • 2. Birth interval <18, >59 months 2.3x • 3. Mother’s age <19, >32 years 1.4x • 4. Home has dirt floor; no water, sewage 1.4x • 5. Fourth or higher birth 1.2x • 6. Male birth 1.2x • 7. Rural residence 1.05x Note: 1. no data available on mother’s health, nutrition, access to pre-natal care, etc. 2. 1980-1995: infant mortality rates by educational levels scarcely changed; even though the overall rate declined by 1/3. Increasing educational levels of mothers cut IMR from 46 to 33/1000.

  24. 6 factors for explaining the health transition and rising life expectancy: the case of Mexico • 1. Public health—substantial efforts from 1919 • 2. Education—from the 1940s, greatest 1970s • 3. Nutrition—improved significantly only from 1950s • 4. Medicine—important since the 1950s • 5. Behavior—deaths from violence (homicides) dropped substantially in the 1960s, but accidents rose sharply • 6. Wealth and income—only since the 1970s

  25. Mortality transitions: Examples from Latin America • Earlier and faster in Argentina, Uruguay, Cuba, and Costa Rica • Later and slower in Chile, Mexico, Brazil and Peru • Slowest in Guatemala, much of Central America, and Haiti

  26. Life Expectancy, 1900-1980, 4 LA countries (unequal in 1900; now converging)

  27. Life expectancy, 150 countries: 1960, 1995

  28. Leading mortality crises in the twentieth century

  29. Conclusions: • France:19th century: major advances for children20th century: improvement for adultssince 1970: improvements for elderly • MexicoAge of pestilence continued to 1918Major improvements since 1930By 1980, differences between countries had narrowed greatly

  30. Conclusions: • Minimal levels of economic and social development are sufficient to initiate the fertility transition. • Modest investments in preventive public health could improve quality of life and longevity in many regions of the globe. • The demographic explosion is nearly over everywhere, except in Africa.

More Related