1 / 30

PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE Integrated Transformation Program Performance Governance System

PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE Integrated Transformation Program Performance Governance System. PRO 3 ITP PGS SCORECARD MEASURE PROFILE. UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011. MEASURE PROFILES Annexes A Regional Economic Development Index B PRO 3 Regional Performance Approval Rating

roary-holloway
Download Presentation

PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE Integrated Transformation Program Performance Governance System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE Integrated Transformation Program Performance Governance System PRO 3 ITP PGS SCORECARD MEASURE PROFILE UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  2. MEASURE PROFILES Annexes A Regional Economic Development Index B PRO 3 Regional Performance Approval Rating C % of Pol Stns compliant with HRD Component D % of Pol Stns compliant with Process & System Component E % of Pol Stns compliant with Facilities Development Component F % of Pol Stns compliant with Citizen’s Empowerment Component G Ratio of Human Rights violations/cases reported againstPolice personnel H Regional Crime Clearance Efficiency I Regional Crime Solution Efficiency J % reduction of incidence of armed insurgents Activities and No. of Barangay Affected K Average Rating of Qualified PNP Applicants L % of personnel completed mandatory courses M % of personnel completed competency/specialized courses N % of personnel assigned to positions according to their Competency & skills O Grievance Ratio P % of personnel provided with housing, Quartering, Educational Assistance and Health care Q % of policies implemented R % of required audits conducted S PRO-3 Resolution Rate of complaints on Corruption T Fund Utilization Efficiency Distribution Scheme(15%:85%, PRO:Field Units) U Maintenance Management System V % of LGUs whose support to PPOs/CPOs/Stn Institutionalized(with POCs) W % of LGUs with sustained initiatives for safer communitieswith the PNP X % of Police Station with LGUs Anti-Criminality Action Plan Y Number of sustained ITP initiatives undertaken with the Interest Groups Z Number of regular interactions with other pillars of the CJS UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  3. Regional Economic Development Index Objective: A safer place to live, work and do business Rationale: Improvement of Gross Regional Domestic Product Growth Rate of Region 3 is indicative of a progressive socio-economic situation for a more stable, peace and order situation. How often is the measure updated/calculated? Yearly What is the unit of measure used? Regional Economic Development index What data is required in calculating the measure? Gross Regional Domestic Product Growth Rate of Region 3 at constant (1985) prize. Where/How is it acquired? Through liaisoning with NEDA Is information about the measure available? Yes When will this information be available? As obtained from source How is the measure calculated? As determined by source Who is responsible for setting targets? NGAs Who is accountable for targets? NGAs Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD A UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  4. PRO3 Performance Approval Percentage Rating Objective: Effectively enforce laws Rationale: By effectively enforcing laws, perception and impression performance will result in the community’s positive public perception. How often is the measure updated/calculated? As determined by source yearly What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of overall performance approval index What data is required in calculating the measure? As determined by source Where/How is it acquired? Data from Pulse Asia or Asia Pacific Center for Research Is information about the measure available? Yes, as obtained from source When will this information be available? As obtained from source How is the measure calculated? As determined by source Who is responsible for setting targets? NGAs Who is accountable for targets? NGAs Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD B UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  5. Percentage of Police Stations Compliant with HRD Component of a Model Police Station Objective: All PRO3 Police Stations shall be comparable to the Model Police Stations. Rationale: In line with the Model Police Stations project. Who is the responsible for setting the targets? RPHRDD. Who is accountable for targets? RPHRDD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? PPOs/CPOs and RPHRDD. • How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly • How is the measure calculated? • MR – Moral Recovery , SVF – Spiritual Values Formation, CB - Capacity Building • A. Individual Compliance to HRD component = (MR /SVF*45) + (CB * 55) • Note: Maximum of 1 MR/SVF for the last 2 years, and 1 CB training • appropriate to designation. • Sum of Individual Compliance • of all Personnel • B. Police Station Compliant = ---------------------------------------------- • to HRD component Total Nr of Personnel • Nr of Police Stations Compliant • to HRD component • C. Percentage of Police Stations = ----------------------------------------------- • Compliant with HRD component Total Nr of PRO Police Stations • What data is required in calculating the measure? • Police Station Training Profile, Police Station List. • Table of CB appropriate training for designation. • Where /How is it acquired ? Consolidated Quarterly Reports submitted by PPOs/CPOs. • Is the information about measure available? Yes, currently available ( ) *100 Note: Or other related Seminars conducted at least at the PPO Level. C UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  6. Percentage of Police Stations compliant with process and system component Objective To establish QSL in all police stations. Rationale To better serve the community Who is responsible for setting targets? RPCRD Who is accountable for targets? RPCRD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD How is the measure calculated? Clarify in terms of formula. No. of police stations established QSL How often is the measure updated / calculated? Quarterly What is the unit of measure used? Number of Police Stations complied X 100 Total No. Of Police Station What data is required in calculating the measure? Where /How is it acquired? Summation of number of police stations compliant with the establishment of QSL. Is information about the measure available? Available with minor changes When will this information be available? Monthly. D UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  7. Percentage of Police Stations compliant with Facilities Development Objective To establish Model Police Station within the entire region. Rationale For the PNP personnel to have a decent Police Station to better serve the community. Who is responsible for setting targets? PNP NHQ Who is accountable for targets? ORLDD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? ORLRDD How often is the measure updated / calculated? Quarterly What is the unit of measure used? Number of Police Stations owned and constructed How is the measure calculated? Clarify in terms of formula. No. of police stations owned and constructed within the region What data is required in calculating the measure? Where /How is it acquired? No. Police Stations owned constructed / total number of Police Station x 100 Is information about the measure available? Currently available E UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  8. Percentage of Police Station Compliant w/ Citizen’s Empowerment Component Objective Adopt the best practices in the community and rights based policing supported by appropriate information and communication technology. Rationale: It is an established component of model police station. Who is responsible for setting targets? RPCRD Who is accountable for targets? RPCRD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD How is the measure calculated? Numbers of Police Stations that displayed the service standard and flowcharts of PNP Citizen’s Charter / Total No. Of Police Stations X 100 What data is required in calculating the measure? Where /How is it acquired? Summation of the numbers of police stations that are compliant with the displaying of service standard and flowchart of PNP Citizen’s Charter. Is information about the measure available? Available with minor changes When will this information be available? Monthly How often is the measure updated / calculated? Monthly What is the unit of measure used? Number of Police Stn complied F UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  9. Ratio of human rights violations/cases filed in court against PNP personnel over population How often is the measure updated / calculated? The measure will be updated/calculated on a quarterly and annual basis. What is the unit of measure used? No. of cases of HRV per period. Objective: Adopt the best practices in community and rights-based policing supported by appropriate information and communication technology. Rationale: Reduction of human rights violation/cases are best indicator for human rights compliance. What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/How is it acquired? The data is acquired through liaisoning with CHR from PPOs/CPOs. Is information about the measure available? Currently available based on CHR Data When will this information be available? As soon the data is available at CHR How is the measure calculated? No. of human rights violations compared with previous data covering the same period. Who is responsible for setting targets? RPCRD Who is accountable for targets? RPCRD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD G UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  10. Regional Crime Clearance Efficiency Objective: To improve the partial solution rate of criminal incidence. To improve the number of cases filed vis-à-vis the number of crime incidence reported to PRO3. Rationale: To reflect the true crime rate and come up with generation of a timely and accurate crime statistics. Who is responsible for setting targets? RIDMD Who is accountable for targets? RIDMD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RIDMD How often is the measure updated/calculated? Monthly What is the unit of measure used? % of total crime cleared and total crime volume How is the measure calculated? Crime Clearance Efficiency = Crime Cleared x 100% Crime volume Crime Volume – number of crime incidents committed in a given area over a period of time which includes index and non-index crimes. What data is required in calculating the measure? UCPER Where/How is it acquired? Through the reports from the different police stations. Is information about the measure available? Currently available When will this information be available? Monthly * CCE targeted at .5% increase per annum based on DIDM H UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  11. Regional Crime Solution Efficiency Objective: To improve the number of cases filed vis-à-vis number of crime incident reported Rationale: To reflect the law enforcement agencies investigative capability or efficiency in the process of solving crime. When will this information be available? Anytime How often is the measure updated/calculated? Monthly What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Solved cases out of the total crime volume. How is the measure calculated? Crime Solution Efficiency = Solved Cases x 100 Crime Volume Crime Volume – No. of crime incidents committed in a given area over a period of time which includes Index and Non- Index crimes reported to the PNP. What data is required in calculating the measure? Total Cases Solved and Crime Volume Where/How is it acquired? Through the reports from the different police stations. • Who is responsible for setting targets? • RIDMD – RAD • Who is accountable for targets? • RIDMD – RAD • Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? • RIDMD - RAD Is information about the measure available? Currently available I UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  12. Percentage reduction of incidence of armed insurgent activities and Barangays affected Objective: Achieve excellence in performing the integrated QUAD operation to overcome the insurgency problem Rationale: Insurgent activities constitute a major threat to peace and order and hinder the socio economic-political stability of an area Who is responsible for setting targets? Regional QUAD staff Who is accountable for targets? Regional QUAD staff Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? Regional QUAD staff How is the measure calculated? No. of incidents in Current Yr – No. of incidents in Previous Yr No. of incidents of Previous Yr No. of brgys affected in Current Yr – No. of brgys affected in Previous Yr No. of brgys affected of Previous Yr When will this information be available? Monthly How often is the measure updates / calculated? Daily/monthly What is the unit of measures used? Percentage reduction Is information about the measure available? Currently available • What data is required in calculating the measure? • No. of armed incidents and of no. barangays affected • Where/How is it acquired? • Daily Intelligence Brief (DIB) UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011 J

  13. Average Rating of Qualified PNP Applicants Objective: To entice at least 250% number of PNP recruitment quota to have a better basis in determining the most qualified applicants. Rationale: Applicant is given corresponding points for the following in reference with NHQ PNP Circular No. 2005-008 dated June 29, 2005 (Rationalization of the Qualified Standards for the Initial appointments to the rank of Police Officer I): What data is required in calculating the measure? Number of Recruit and Sum of Final Grade of all Recruit and Allotted Quota for PRO3 Where /How is it acquired ? Worksheets and Table evaluations of documents submitted by the applicants. Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RPHRDD. How often is the measure updated/calculated? Every Recruitment Program/Quota What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Number of Recruits and Average Rating obtained by the recruits. How is the measure calculated? Nr . of Applicants Nr. of Quota Final Grade of an applicant is computed as follows: Education (Minimum 21 pts, Maximum 30 pts), Eligibility (Minimum 21 pts, Maximum 30 pts), Agility Test (Minimum 11.25 pts, Maximum 15 pts), Interview (Minimum 16.75 pts, Maximum 25 pts) , Board Passers of their courses are given higher points in Education. Plus bonus points for honor graduates and those with LLB units.   Rating on board exam/PNP Entrance or CSC Prof is the basis for Eligibility points. Plus 1 pt for any additional eligibility. The top ranking applicants will be selected for appointment. Who is accountable for targets? RPHRDD Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RPHRDD X 100 K UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  14. Percentage of Personnel Completed Mandatory Courses Objective: Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police force committed to serve and protect the people Rationale: Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police force committed to serve and protect the people. All PRO3 should have undergone the mandatory course required to their rank to enable them to discharge the responsibilities tasked to them. Is the information about measure available? Yes, currently available. Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD. How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Total Number of PNP Personnel of PRO3 with mandatory training/ schooling required for the current rank. How is the measure calculated? Total Nr of Personnel with mandatory training/schooling required for the current rank Total Nr of PNP Personnel of PRO3 What data is required in calculating the measure? Updated Training Profile and Updated Strength Profile of PRO3 Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person) Consolidated Training Profile and Strength profile from RHQs/PPOs/CPOs/3rd RPSB Who is accountable for targets? DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RHQs/PPOs/CPOs/3rd RPSB ) ( X 100 L UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  15. Percentage of personnel completed in –service training Objective: Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police force committed to serve and protect the people Rationale: Train and develop a well-motivated and competent police force committed to serve and protect the people. Who is accountable for targets? DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RPHRDD/RHQs/PPOs/CPOs/3rd RPSB How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Total Number of PNP Personnel of PRO3 completed competency/ specialized course. How is the measure calculated? Total Nr of Personnel completed in-service training Total Nr of PNP Personnel of PRO3 What data is required in calculating the measure? Nr of Personnel completed in-service training Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person) Training profile of Personnel who completed in –service trainingfrom RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB Is the information about measure available? Yes, currently available Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? DHRDD, DPRM and RPHRDD. ( ) X 100 UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011 M

  16. Percentage of all personnel assigned to positions according to their competency and skills Objective: Uphold and promote the principles of meritocracy and fitness in the PNP career ladder Rationale: Required Placement for Police Superintendent Based on the Updated Provisional List of Position for PSUPT as of June 29, 2010 and Police Chief Inspector Based on the Updated Provisional List of Position for PCINSP as of January 2009 What data is required in calculating the measure? Nr. of PNP Personnel without competency /specialized course Where /How is it acquired? Monthly Report of Placement of PSUPT and PCINSP from the PPOs/CPOs/ RPSB3 How often is the measure updated/calculated? Monthly What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Total Number PSUPT and PCINSP occupying T.O. Positions How is the measure calculated? Total No. of PSUPT and PCINSP occupying T.O. Positions Allocated PSUPTs and PCINSP Positions Who is accountable for targets? RPHRDD Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RPHRDD Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RPHRDD. ( ) X 100 Is the information about measure available? Yes, currently available UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011 N

  17. Grievance Ratio Is the information about measure available? Yes, currently available Objective: To address immediately any valid complaint by member(s) of the PNP Rationale: Promote the Grievance System of the PNP where they can voice out their grievances and not in other venues. Speedy disposition of these Grievances will result to the PNP personnel’s trust in the System. Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RPHRDD Who is accountable for targets? Immediate Superior or Chief of office Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RPHRDD and Immediate Superior or Chief of Office How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly and Annual Basis What is the unit of measure used? Ratio of grievances resolved to the total number of grievances filed. How is the measure calculated? Nr of Grievances Resolved : Nr of Grievances filed What data is required in calculating the measure? Nr. of grievances filed and resolved Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person) Report from RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB O UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  18. Percentage of Personnel provided with Housing, Quartering, Educational assistance and Healthcare Objective: Institutionalize adequate package of benefits and remuneration Rationale: To determine the nr of Personnel who availed of housing, Quartering, educational assistance and healthcare . Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RPHRDD Who is accountable for targets? RPHRDD Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RPHRDD How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly and Semi Annually What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of Personnel with Housing, Quartering, Educational Assistance, Healthcare How is the measure calculated? HOUSING=Total Nr of Personnel provided with housing by the PNP X 100 Total Nr PRO3 Personnel without house and Lot EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE = Total Nr of Scholars X 100 Total Nr of entitled dependents Quartering = Total Nr of Personnel occupying Gov’t Quarters X 100 Total Nr PRO3 Personnel without house and Lot Health Care = No. of PRO 3 PNP Personnel who availed of RHE X 100 Total Nr of PRO Personnel What data is required in calculating the measure? Nr. of PNP Personnel provided with house and Lot., Nr of personnel without house and lot, Nr. of PNP Personnel who were KIA. Nr of entitled dependents of all KIA personnel, Nr of Personnel occupying Gov’t Quarters, No. of PRO 3 PNP Personnel who availed of RHE, and No of PRO3 Personnel Reported Confined and Discharged from Confinement Where /How is it acquired? Reports from RPHRDD, RESPO, RLRDD, RHS3 Is the information about measure available? Housing - Yes, currently available Educational Assistance - Yes, currently available Quartering - Yes, currently available RHE - Yes, currently available UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011 P

  19. Percentage of policies implemented Objective: Ensure an enabling environment for Organizational Development Rationale: Determine whether all of the policies are implemented. Is the information about measure available? Yes, currently available Who is the responsible for Setting the Targets? RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB How often is the measure updated/calculated? Quarterly and Annual Basis What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of policies implemented How is the measure calculated? Total Nr of Policies in the organization Actual number of policies implemented What data is required in calculating the measure? List of Existing Policies and Action taken / reports from units on their implementation of policies. Where /How is it acquired (specify document/or person) Reports from RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB Who is accountable for targets? RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB Who is Responsible for tracking and reporting the targets? RHQs/PPOs/ CPOs/3rd RPSB ) ( X 100 Q UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  20. Percentage of required audits conducted Objective: Ensure transparency and accountability in all financial and logistical transactions Rationale: To optimize the proper utilization of funds and management of logistical resources How are the units of measures used? MOOE = Report of utilization Personal Services = Report of Disbursement Capital Outlay = Inventory reports of plants, properties and equipment What data are required in calculating the measures? Where/how are they acquired? MOOE = RAOMO (Registry of Allotment & Obligation on MOOE) Personal Services = RAOPS (Registry Allotment & Obligation on Personal Services) Capital Outlay = RAOCO (Registry Allotment & Obligation on Capital Outlay) Is information about the measure available? Currently available Who is responsible for setting targets? D-Staff Who is accountable for targets? D-Staff Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RCD How are the measures calculated? MOOE: 15 % 85% scheme Personal Services: NCA received x 100 Fund released Capital Outlay: Fund Released - NCA Received Fund Utilization Note: Computation of PS 312,120,355.45 x 100 = 100% 312,120,355.45 Computation of CO 3,729,000 – 559,350 = 85% 3,729,000 UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011 R

  21. PRO3 Resolution Rate of complaints on CORRUPTION Objective: Ensure transparency and accountability in all financial and logistical transactions Rationale: This will determine PRO3 Resolution Rate of complaints on corruption . How often is the measure updated / calculated? Monthly What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of resolved cases on corruption What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/how is it required? Monthly Report s submitted by PPOs and CPOs Is information about the measure available? Still to be formulated Who is responsible for setting targets? RCD Who is accountable for targets? RCD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RCD How is the measures calculated? No. of complaints – No. Of unresolved X 100 No. of complaints UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011 S

  22. Fund Utilization Efficiency Distribution Scheme 15% - 85% (PROs/Field Units) Objective: Optimize utilization of financial and logistical resources to support administrative, operational and other priority programs of the PNP Rationale: This will put the operations of the PNP within the context of a well defined, integrated and synchronized planning and budgeting How is the measures calculated? Per capita = Programmable amount No. of personnel How often is the measure updated / calculated? Monthly What is the unit of measure used? Sub-allotments issued to Program Directors (D-Staff) What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/how is it required? Registry allotment of MOOE Is information about the measure available? Currently available Who is responsible for setting targets? Program Directors (D-Staff) Who is accountable for targets? Program Directors (D-Staff) Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? All D-Staff, PROs, DILG/NAPOLCOM, COA, DBM & NEDA T UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  23. Maintenance Management System Objective: To optimize utilization of financial and logistical resources to support administrative, operational and other priority programs of PRO3 Rationale: An antiquated and dilapidated building for police stations and PNP equipments put the lives of our personnel in danger and continually undermines the capability of the PNP to combat crime efficiently and effectively. Who is responsible for setting targets? ORLRDD Who is accountable for targets? ORLRDD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? ORLRDD Is information about the measure available? Available with minor changes How is the measure calculated? Police stations owned and constructed: X + Y X 100 = % of PS in good conditions Z X – Total Nr. of PS presently in good condition (Repaired/renovated and newly constructed) Y – Nr. of PS for the year (Repaired/renovated and newly constructed) Z – Total Nr. of PS region wide Mobility: No. of serviceable vehicles X 100 Total no. of issued vehicles Firearms: No. of serviceable firearms X 100 Total no. of iss ued firearms Inves Eqmt: No. of serviceable Inves Eqmt X 100 Total no. of issued Inves Eqmt Commo Eqmt: No. of serviceable Commo Eqmt X 100 Total no. of issued Commo Eqmt How often is the measure updated / calculated? Quarterly What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of serviceable police equipments What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/How is it acquired? Data on status of police station buildings renovated and the status of PNP equipment regionwide which can be obtained from the quarterly inventory reports submitted by the PPOs/CPOs. UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011 U

  24. Baseline Data of Maintenance Management System Note: Police Station : As of 2009 PRO3 has 43 total no. of Police Station owned and constructed vis-a-vis the 128 total no. of Police Station in the region. Targets indicated above are based on the submitted 15 years program for the construction of Police Station Buildings of the Regional Engineering office3 to TDL dated June 21, 2009. Completion of the targets indicated therein will depend upon the release of funds from the National Headquarters. Firearms: To attain the 1 is to 1 ratio issuance of short firearms to PNP personnel. Filled-up of long firearms by 50% of all Police Stations and 100% on RPSB/PPSC/CPSC. Attainment of the targets indicated therein will depend upon the issuances of firearms from the National Headquarters. Mobility: Attainment of the targets indicated therein will depend upon the issuances of mobility from the National Headquarters. All Police Station will have at least 2 patrol cars/jeeps and 2 motorcycles Investigative Equipment: Every Police station shall have investigative equipments which contains finger print kit, tape recorder, security line, finger print card and camera. UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011 UI

  25. Communications equipment The table represents the parameters needed for a unit(PRO,PPO,CPO.MPS) to be considered filled-up according to its classification whether type A,B or C . At present the region has total 1590 hand held radio, 228 base radio and 209 mobile radios with general average of 39.27 % filled-up. UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011 U2

  26. Percentage of LGU whose support to PPOs/CPOs is institutionalized with POCs Objective: Attain financial and logistical adequacy consistent with law Rationale: To institutionalize the support of the LGU in anti-criminal campaign of the PPOs/CPOs How is the measure calculated? Program Review and Analysis Total No. of unit (PPOs/CPOs and MPS/CPS) with support of POC / Total No. of unit (PPOs/CPOs and MPS/CPS) X 100 How often is the measure updated / calculated? Semi-Annually What is the unit of measure used? Percentage of LGU’s support to PPOs and CPOs What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/how is it required? Reports submitted by PPOs and CPOs Is information about the measure available? Available with minor changes Who is responsible for setting targets? RCD/ROPD Who is accountable for targets? RCD/ROPD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RCD/ROPD V UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  27. Percentage of LGUs & LCEs with sustained initiatives for safer communities with the PNP (Percentage of Barangays with BPATs Organized and Mobilized) UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011 W

  28. Percentage of Police Stations w/ LGU’s Anti-Criminality Action Plan How often is the measure updated? Yearly updated Objective: Sustainable partnership and collaboration with the stakeholders. Rationale: Holistic approach in addressing crimes involving the participation of LGUs. What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/How is it acquired? ACAP of MPS/CPS Who is responsible for setting targets? ROPD Who is accountable for targets? ROPD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? ROPD How is the measure calculated? Percentage Total Score Gathered from Points Allocated % of PS with ACAP = # of Pol Stn with ACAP X 100 total # of Pol Station Is information about the measure available? Available with minor changes When will this information be available? As submitted by CPS/MPS X UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011

  29. Number of sustained ITP initiatives undertaken with interest group. How often is the measure updated? Monthly basis. Objective: Sustainable partnership and collaboration with the stakeholders through public information campaign. Rationale: To gain the support of stakeholders as partners for a genuine transformation in the PNP. What data is required in calculating the measure? Where/How is it acquired? Number of sustained ITP lectures/Information campaign Who is responsible for setting targets? RPCRD Who is accountable for targets? RPCRD Who is responsible for tracking and reporting targets? RPCRD How is the measure calculated? Total number of ITP lectures conducted Is information about the measure available? Yes When will this information be available? As submitted by PPOs and CPOs UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011 Y

  30. Number of regular interactions with other pillars of CJS UPDATED AS OF JAN 14,2011 Z

More Related