1 / 75

Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data

Analyzing student achievement data in reading, math, and science at Grinnell High School for 2011-2012, along with AIG, SIAC, and AYP definitions.

Download Presentation

Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Grinnell High School Student Achievement Data 2011-2012

  2. Definition of terms • AIG: Annual Improvement Goals (Set by the district, must be measurable, approved by the School Improvement Advisory Committee and then by the board) • SIAC: School Improvement Advisory Committee (District Employees, Community Members who look at student achievement data and make a recommendation to the board for student achievement goals). • AYP: Adequate Yearly Progress (NCLB stair-step model of proficiency) which is reported to the state. Schools must meet AYP or go on a watch list, then become a SINA school

  3. District Annual Improvement Goals • All FAY students in grades 4, 8, and 11 will meet or exceed typical NSS growth on Iowa Testing in math and reading. • All FAY students in grades 8 and 11 will meet or exceed typical NSS growth on Iowa Testing in science. • The district will develop a common language and process to assist students in goal setting to promote individual growth K-12.

  4. GHS Reading Data (AIG) • In 2010-11, 39 students had a National Standard Score that was considered less than typical in Reading Comprehension at the 10th Grade level. • 29 of those students improved their NSS Reading Score by at least 7 NSS points as 11th Graders (74.4%) • 101 out of 136 students made typical growth from 10th – 11th grade (73.9%) . • RESULT: Goal that all students meet or exceed typical NS growth was not met by 35 students in Reading Comprehension.

  5. Reading Proficiency: Class of 2012

  6. Reading Proficiency: Class of 2013

  7. Reading Proficiency: Class of 2014

  8. Reading Proficiency: Class of 2015

  9. 9th Reading Comp. Biennium

  10. 10th Reading Comp. Biennium

  11. 11th Reading Comp. Biennium

  12. 11th Reading Comp. Biennium (F/R)

  13. 11th Reading Comp. Biennium (Non F/R)

  14. 11th Reading Comp. Biennium (IEP)

  15. 11th Reading Comp. Biennium (Non-IEP)

  16. AYP (NCLB) Trajectory

  17. Reading: Less Than Typical NSS

  18. Reading: Exceeding NSS Growth

  19. Reading: NSS Average Growth

  20. District Annual Improvement Goals • All FAY students in grades 4, 8, and 11 will meet or exceed typical NSS growth on Iowa Testing in math and reading. • All FAY students in grades 8 and 11 will meet or exceed typical NSS growth on Iowa Testing in science. • The district will develop a common language and process to assist students in goal setting to promote individual growth K-12.

  21. GHS Math Data (AIG) • In 2010-11, 29 students had a National Standard Score that was considered less than typical in Math at the 10th Grade level. • 24 of those students improved their NSS Math Score by at least 7 NSS points as 11th Graders (82.8%) • 96 out of 136 students made typical growth from 10th – 11th grade (70.7%) . • RESULT: Goal that all students meet or exceed typical NS growth was not met by 40 students in Math.

  22. Math Proficiency: Class of 2012

  23. Math Proficiency: Class of 2013

  24. Math Proficiency: Class of 2014

  25. Math Proficiency: Class of 2015

  26. 9th Math Biennium

  27. 10th Math Biennium

  28. 11th Math Biennium

  29. 11th Math Biennium (F/R)

  30. 11th Math Biennium (Non F/R)

  31. 11th Math Biennium (IEP)

  32. 11th Math Biennium (Non-IEP)

  33. AYP (NCLB) Trajectory

  34. Math: Less Than Typical NSS

  35. Math: Exceeding NSS Growth

  36. Math: Average NSS Growth

  37. District Annual Improvement Goals • All FAY students in grades 4, 8, and 11 will meet or exceed typical NSS growth on Iowa Testing in math and reading. • All FAY students in grades 8 and 11 will meet or exceed typical NSS growth on Iowa Testing in science. • The district will develop a common language and process to assist students in goal setting to promote individual growth K-12.

  38. GHS Science Data (AIG) • In 2010-11, 32 students had a National Standard Score that was considered less than typical in Science at the 10th Grade level. • 23 of those students improved their NSS Science Score by at least 7 NSS points as 11th Graders (71.9%) • 101 out of 136 students made typical growth from 10th – 11th grade (74.4%) . • RESULT: Goal that all students meet or exceed typical NS growth was not met by 35 students in Math.

  39. Science Proficiency: Class of 2012

  40. Science Proficiency: Class of 2013

  41. Science Proficiency: Class of 2014

  42. Science Proficiency: Class of 2015

  43. 9th Science Biennium

  44. 10th Science Biennium

  45. 11th Science Biennium

  46. 11th Science Biennium (F/R)

  47. 11th Science Biennium (Non F/R)

  48. 11th Science Biennium (IEP)

  49. 11th Science Biennium (Non-IEP)

  50. District Annual Improvement Goals • Increase the percentage of students whose reading comprehension NSS are above the typical NSS increase for grades 4, 8, and 11 as compared to their matched cohort FAY NSS scores in grades 3, 7, and 10 in reading comprehension and mathematics, and in grades 8 and 11 as compared to their matched cohort FAY NSS scores in grades 7 and 10 in science, as measured by the appropriate ITBS and ITED subtests.

More Related