1 / 20

Adaptive local dissimilarity measures for discriminative dimension of labeled data

Adaptive local dissimilarity measures for discriminative dimension of labeled data. Presenter : Kung, Chien-Hao Authors : Kerstin Bunte , Barbara Hammer, Axel Wismuller , Michael Biehl 2010,NC. Outlines. Motivation Objectives Methodology Experiments Conclusions Comments.

rocco
Download Presentation

Adaptive local dissimilarity measures for discriminative dimension of labeled data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adaptive local dissimilarity measures for discriminative dimension of labeled data Presenter : Kung, Chien-HaoAuthors : Kerstin Bunte, Barbara Hammer, Axel Wismuller,Michael Biehl2010,NC

  2. Outlines • Motivation • Objectives • Methodology • Experiments • Conclusions • Comments

  3. Motivation • Dimension reduction embedding in lower dimensions necessarily includes a loss of information. • To explicitly control the information kept by a specific dimension reduction technique are highly desirable.

  4. Objectives • The aim of this paper is to combine an adaptive metric and recent visualization techniques towards a discriminative approach.

  5. Methodology Charting Stochastic neighbor embedding (SNE) LiRaM LVQ Locally linear embedding (LLE) Exploration observation machine(XOM) Isomap Maximum variance unfolding(MVU)

  6. Methodology LiRaM LVQ • Prototype based classifier, extension of LVQ • Modified Euclidean distance: • Adapt local matrices during training(minimize a cost function by gradient descent)

  7. Methodology Combination of local linear patches by charting • The charting technique can decompose the sample data into locally linear patches and combine them into a single low-dimensional coordinate system.

  8. Methodology Locally linear embedding (LLE) • Locally linear embedding (LLE) uses the criterion of topology preservation for dimension reduction.

  9. Methodology Isomap • Isomap is an extension of metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling(MDS) which uses distance preservation as criterion

  10. Methodology Stochastic neighbor embedding (SNE) • Stochastic neighbor embedding (SNE) constitutes an unsupervised projection which follows a probability based approach.

  11. Methodology Exploration observation machine(XOM) • The exploratory observation machine (XOM) has recently been introduced as a novel computational framework for structure-preserving dimension reduction.

  12. Methodology Maximum variance unfolding(MVU) • Maximum variance unfolding(MVU) is a dimension reduction technique which aims at preservation if local distances.

  13. Experiments

  14. Experiments Three tip star data set

  15. Experiments Wine data set

  16. Experiments Segmentationdata set

  17. Experiments USPSdata set

  18. Experiments

  19. Conclusions • The results are quite diverse and no single method which is optimum for every case an be identified. • In general, discriminative visualization as introduced in this paper improves all the corresponding unsupervised methods.

  20. Comments • Advantages • This paper is easy to read. • Applications • Dimension reduction

More Related