1 / 9

Beth Hobbs EDU 361

rodd
Download Presentation

Beth Hobbs EDU 361

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. East Hartford Education Association, The Connecticut Education Association, Inc., and Richard P. Brimley v.Board of Education of the Town of East Hartford, and Barbara Atwood, Robert Bannon, Kenneth Carrie, M. Glenn Frank, Eleanor Kepler, Walter H. Mills, Jr., Timothy J. Moynihan, Joyce Ruggles and John J. Smith, Jr., individually and in their capacities as members of the Board of Education of the Town of East Hartford Beth HobbsEDU 361

  2. Regulations for Teacher Dress • The attire of professional employees during the hours when school is in session must be judged in light of the following: • Dress should reflect the professional position of the employee. • Attire should be that which is commonly accepted in the community. • It should be exemplary of the students with whom the professional employee works. • Clothing should be appropriate to the assignment of the employee, such as slacks, and jersey for gym teachers.

  3. Richard P. Brimley • Public School Teacher • English & Filmmaking • Did not adhere to the dress code implemented in 1972 • Was reprimanded • Followed protocol for complaints

  4. Legal Proceedings • Started with Formal Arbitration Proceedings • Lawsuit filed by Brimley against the Board of Education and its members as individuals

  5. Mr. Brimley’s Argument • The dress code violated his First Amendment right to Free Speech & his 14th Amendment right to due process • “Benefits of his tielessness”

  6. The Board of Education’s Argument • The dress code was in place for the following reasons: • Promotes respect for authority and traditional values • Promotes discipline in the classroom

  7. The First Court Decision • First Court: United States Second Circuit Court • Brimley was granted Summary Judgment stating that the reprimand was a violation of his rights to free speech and privacy

  8. The Final Decision • Case was continued on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit • The court reversed the Second Circuit Court decision and vacated the judgment

  9. Implications & Application for Educators • Teachers are not permitted to violate school dress code policies. • The best interest of the school supersedes the personal preference of the teacher.

More Related