230 likes | 392 Views
Source apportionment of PM in the ADMS model David Carruthers. Workshop on Source Apportionment of Particulate Matter Imperial College London Friday, 23 April 2010. Contents. Modelling methodology London Marylebone Road Resuspension Other. Model ADMS-Urban Model Methodology.
E N D
Source apportionment of PM in the ADMS model David Carruthers Workshop on Source Apportionment of Particulate Matter Imperial College London Friday, 23 April 2010
Contents • Modelling methodology • London • Marylebone Road • Resuspension • Other
Model ADMS-Urban Model Methodology • Models all source groups within the urban area – typically hour by hour calculation • Explicitly models major road sources, major industrial sources. Includes street canyon model • Other sources modelled as grid sources (e.g.1km* 1km • Regional pollution from rural monitoring sites or from larger area model (e.g. WRF/CMAQ or Pre’vair/Chimere)
Model verification at AURN Sites – PM10 & PM2.5London (2001) PM10 Annual Mean 90.4th percentile PM2.5
Contributions of source groups to total PM10 concentrations 2010
Source apportionment of PM10 from vehicle exhaust emissions 2010
Source apportionment of PM10 traffic emissions. Mean all London AURN sites
Marylebone Road 2001 – Modelled time series and Number of exceedences of limit values
Marylebone Road Source contributions to modelled annual average PM10 concentration Source contribution of vehicle types
Modelled source contributions to modelled daily average PM10 concentrations, Marylebone Road 2001
Source contributions to exceedences of the 50µg/m³ objective value, ordered by background contribution and major road contribution
Major road and background contribution compared to total concentration Comparison of major road and rural background concentrations
Non-Exhaust Emissions of PM • DEFRA Project –TRL, University of Birmingham, CERC • Review of methodologies for tyre wear, brake wear and road wear • Focus resuspension
Non-exhaust study- Resuspension • Estimated from measurements at Marylebone Road & Bloomsbury. ETOTAL, NON-EX = ETYRE + E BRAKE + EROAD + ERESUSP • ETYRE, EBRAKE & EROADdetermined using several methods • Existing EMEP method • RAINS database • CEPMEIP database • PM2.5 = exhaust (94%), PM2.5-10 = non-exhaust + exhaust (6%) • ERESUSP dominated by HDV 116mg/km,(LDV 0.02mg/km)
Non-exhaust study - dispersion modelling sites • 4 TRAMAQ sites (Birmingham Selly Oak, Park Lane, Elephant and Castle, High Holborn) • PM10 and PM2.5 • Kerbside and background • Chemical component data available • 9 London DEFRA sites • 2 with PM10 and PM2.5 • 7 with PM10 only
Non-exhaust study Road Traffic Emission totals 2002 London
Traffic source contribution to modelled concentrations (London 2002) PM10 PMcoarse PM2.5
Non-Exhaust studyDispersion modelling - PM10 Annual average PM10 concentrations
Non Exhaust StudyDispersion modelling - PM2.5 Annual average PM2.5 concentrations
Non-exhaust studyDispersion modelling - source apportionment Annual average PM10 concentrations
Non-exhaust study: Resuspension – UncertaintyDependence on wind speed
Non-exhaust study Resuspension Uncertainty - source properties
Singapore Harrison Chemical Speciation model based on chemical sampling vs PM measurements