E N D
1. Stress in AquacultureTime to Take Action Ahmed Mustafa
Department of Biology
Indiana University-Purdue University
Fort Wayne, IN
2. What is Aquaculture Aquaculture is the propagation and husbandry of aquatic plants and animals in water for commercial, recreational, and scientific purposes.
Aquaculture is the farming of aquatic plants and animals.
3. Types of Aquaculture Extensive
Intensive
Semi-intensive
4. Types of Aquaculture Extensive aquaculture involves low degree of control over environment, nutrition, predators, competitors, and disease causing agents. Plant and animal seed stock is obtained from nature. Cost, technology, stocking rates, and production levels are low.
5. Types of Aquaculture Intensive aquaculture involves high degree of control over the systems. Seed stock is produced from domestic brood stock within the system. Cost, technology, stocking density, and production levels are all high.
6. Types of Aquaculture Semi-intensive aquaculture involves a combination of some attributes of extensive and intensive aquaculture. It is usually done in men-made ponds and raceways. Cost, technology, stocking rate and production levels are all intermediate.
7. Types of Aquaculture Monoculture
Polyculture
Integrated Farming
8. Types of Aquaculture Monoculture:
Culture of one species
Extensive, intensive, or semi-intensive
9. Types of Aquaculture Polyculture:
Culture of multiple species
Usually semi-intensive
10. Types of Aquaculture Integrated Farming:
Integrated farming systems are probably as old as farming itself if the broadest definition of integrated farming is accepted. Integration occurs when outputs (usually by-products) of one production sub-system are used as inputs by another, within the farm unit: (Semi-intensive system).
11. Aquaculture Products About 20,000 sp of fish, 200,000 sp of invertebrates & 14,000 sp of aquatic plants - about 500 of these sp are now cultivated commercially:
314 fin fish
74 crustaceans
69 molluscs
43 algae
13 angiosperms
12 sponges
9 amphibians
4 reptiles
3 rotifers
2 annelids
2 mammals
1 echinoderms
12. Other Aquaculture Products Pharmaceuticals
Enzymes
Biomolecular Materials
Biomonitors
Biopesticides
Biomass for energy production
13. Problems of Aquaculture Extensive Husbandry Methods
crowding, handling, vaccinating
Environmental impacts
Temperature, salinity, toxicity from chemical discharge
Diseases
Parasitic, bacterial, viral
STRESS
14. Problems of Aquaculture STRESS
15. Problems of Aquaculture Stress
Any stimulus that impairs the normal performance
Acute or chronic
Levels of stress
Primary: activation of neuroendocrine system and production of stress hormone, cortisol (Alarm)
Secondary: effects of cortsiol on physiological systems (Resistance)
Tertiary: consequence of physiological changes (Exhaustion)
16. Problems of Aquaculture
17. Problems of Aquaculture Stress
Physical
Chemical
Biological
18. Problems of Aquaculture SEA LICE
19. What are Sea Lice Mustafa, A., Conboy, G., and Burka, J. 2001.
Life-span and reproductive capacity of sea lice,
Lepeoththeirus salmonis, under laboratory conditions.
Bulletin of the Aquaculture Association of Canada. 4: 113-114.
20. What are Sea Lice Lepeophtheirus salmonis (salmon louse)
Natural parasite to salmonids
Restricted to genera Salmo, Salvelinus, Oncorhynchus
Caligus elongatus (sea louse)
Parasite to many marine fishes
Rreported from 73 different families
22. What are Sea Lice
23. What are Sea Lice:Current Treatment Methods Chemical
Drug bath
Drugs incorporated in feed
Biological
Cleaner fish
27. Limitations:
Efficacy of removing sea lice
Stress it causes to fish
Availability
Financial costs
Environmental effects
28. Cost of Sea Lice Treatment Mustafa, A., Rankadua, W., and Campbell, P. 2001.
Estimating the cost of sea lice to salmon aquaculture
in Eastern Canada.
Canadian Veterinary Journal, 42: 54-56.
29. Cost of Sea Lice Treatment Loss Factors Total Loss in Value/Year
(Can$)
Reduced growth 180,000
Reduced FCR 37,500
Downgrading 6,000
Secondary disease 27,000
Mortality 81,000
Treatment 1 12,000
Treatment 2 10,000
Treatment 3 10,000
* Estimation calculated from a small salmon farm (200,000 fish)
30. Cost of Sea Lice Treatment Average Cost to Produce Salmon from a Small Farm
Farm Without Farm With Farm With
Sea lice Sea lice Sea lice
(no Treatment) (Regular Treatment)
200,000 fish
X 3kg/fish @ 3,600,000 3,936,000 3,696,000
Harvest
31. To minimize the dependency on chemical treatments
To maximize the economics of salmon
aquaculture
32. To determine the effects of sea lice on the development of chronic stress and suppression of host defense mechanisms
To identify practices that could reduce stress in salmon and consequently, susceptibility to sea lice infections
To investigate the role of stress responses on the effectiveness of current and future therapeutics
33. Effects of Sea Lice Mustafa, A., MacWilliams, C., Fernandez, N., Matchet, K., Conboy, G., and Burka, J. 2000.
Effects of sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) infestation on macrophage functions in Atlantic salmon (Salmon salar).
Fish and Shellfish Immunology, 10: 47-59.
34. Experimental design
Fish and their maintenance
Atlantic salmon smolts (S2)
Two groups: control and infested
Acclimation: 30±2 ppt; 10±1o C
Sea lice culture and infestation
Ovigerous sea lice from Bay of Fundy
Cultured at lab condition (27±2 ppt; 10±1o C)
Infested salmon with infective copepodids
35. Sampling
At day 0 prior to sea lice infestation
At days 3, 7, 14, and 21 post-infestation
Samples
Blood : Plasma cortisol and plasma glucose
Head kidney : Macrophage functions
41. Summary
The decreased macrophage activities are the consequences of chronic stress due to sea lice infections and their development gradient.
42. Enhanced Effects of Sea Lice Mustafa, A., Speare, D., Daley, J., Conboy, G., and Burka, J. 2000.
Enhanced susceptibility of seawater cultured rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, to the microsporidian Loma salmonae during a primary infection with the sea louse,
Lepeophtheirus salmonis.
Journal of Fish Diseases, 23: 337-341.
43. Hypothesis
Sea lice cause infested fish to become more susceptible to pathogens, particularly those for which the host would typically mount a cell-mediated immune response
Goals
Determine if macrophage functions in seawater cultured rainbow trout are impaired by experimental infestation with the sea louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis
Determine if macrophage impairment has significant effects on the susceptibility to a second pathogen, the gill microsporidian Loma salmonae
44. Experimental design
Fish and their maintenance
Rainbow trout
Two groups: control and infested
Acclimation: 30±2 ppt; 10±1o C
Sea lice culture and infestation
Ovigerous sea lice from Bay of Fundy
Cultured at lab condition (27±2 ppt; 10±1o C)
Infested trout with infective copepodids
(Intensity: moderate to high)
45. Experimental design
Loma infestation
Day 28 post-sea lice infestation
Mature xenomas from previously infested trout
Macerated materials
Infested trout by feeding spores
46. Sampling
At day 0 prior to sea lice infestation
At days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 88 post-sea lice infestation
Samples
Fish : Sea lice numbers
Gills : Xenoma counts
Head kidney : Macrophage functions
51. Summary
Macrophage functions in sea lice infested fish are impaired, predisposing fish to subsequent infections to a second pathogen, Loma salmonae.
Loma salmonae is a useful biological probe to assess whether host macrophage function suppression is biologically significant.
With a plausible mechanism, pre-existing infection with one pathogen can undermine the resistance of fish to a second pathogen.
52. Sea Lice: Host Specificity Fast, M., Ross, N., Mustafa, A., Sims, D., Johnson, S., Conboy, G., Speare, D., Johnson, G., and Burka, J. 2002.
Susceptibility of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar and coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch to experimental infection with sea lice,
Lepeophtheirus salmonis.
Diseases of Aquatic Organism, 52: 57-68.
53. Objective:
To see if there are significant differences in mucus biochemistry and numbers of sea lice that occur between the three species
54. Sampling
160 fish of each species randomly distributed to 2 control and 2 treatment tanks.
Sea lice were grown in lab and fish were infected
100-150 infective copepods/fish to treatment tanks
0 (prior to infection),1,3,7,14 days post infection (dpi)
Samples
Mucus
Blood
55. Levels of infection: salmon- trout -coho salmon
56. Sea Lice: Host Specificity Fast, M., Sims, D., Burka, J., Mustafa, A., Ross, N. 2002.
Skin morphology and hormonal non-specific defense
parameters of mucus and plasma in rainbow trout,
coho and Atlantic salmon.
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 132: 645- 657.
57. Objectives:
To see if there are significant differences in
Mucus Biochemistry
Skin Histology
58. Sampling
120 fish
40 Atlantic salmon
40 rainbow trout
40 Coho salmon
Adapted to salt water
Fed twice daily to satiation
Infected with sea lice
Samples
Mucus
Blood
59. Coho salmon have sacciform cells (protective?)
60. Sea Lice Control:Alternative Methods Mustafa, A. and MacKinnon, B. 1999.
Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar and Arctic char, Salvelinus alpinus: Comparative correlation between iodine-iodide supplementation, thyroid hormone levels, plasma cortisol levels, and infection intensity with the sea louse, Caligus elongatus.
Canadian Journal of Zoology, 77: 1092-1101.
61. Objectives:
To determine whether differences in infection intensity are correlated with physiological stress;
and
if supplemental iodine/iodide provided to fish would result in lowered physiological stress and lowered infection intensity.
68. Conclusion
Supplementation of iodine in freshwater improves the health of Atlantic salmon by increasing the production of thyroid hormones, decreasing the production of cortisol, and decreasing the infection intensity of infection.
69. Sea Lice Control:Alternative Methods Mustafa, A. Peters, G. and Burka, J. 2001.
Do water temperature and flow affect sea lice
development and settlement?
Bulletin of the Aquaculture Association of Canada. 5: 53-55.
70. Objectives:
To determine role of water temperature and flow on the development and settlement of sea lice on their salmon host.
71. Intensity of Sea lice infection
Experimental Groups Sampling Period
Week 2 Week 4 Week 6
5C Low Flow 13.2 13.2 12.4
5C High Flow 12.9 12.2 11.1
10C Low Flow 12.4 12.6 11.6
10C High Flow 12.5 10.3 9.4
15C Low Flow 12.9 12.2 10.8
15C High Flow 12.6 9.3 7.6
72. Conclusion:
Water temperature and increased flow significantly impact sea lice development and retention. Adaptation of these results under farm condition could be a significant boost to sea lice control with no environmental and chemotherapeutic consequences.
73. My School of Fish at IPFW