1 / 12

ASALGP WORKSHOP

ASALGP WORKSHOP. Co-operative governance between local and district municipalities Professor Louis de Clerq and representatives of Umkhanyakude Municipality. NATURE OF THE PROBLEM. Lack of co-operation between B and C Municipalities

rory
Download Presentation

ASALGP WORKSHOP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ASALGP WORKSHOP Co-operative governance between local and district municipalities Professor Louis de Clerq and representatives of Umkhanyakude Municipality

  2. NATURE OF THE PROBLEM • Lack of co-operation between B and C Municipalities • Poor understanding of the roles of the two categories of municipalities • Poor communication between the two categories • Exclusions from decision making of local municipalities • Uncertainty regarding the roles of local municipal representatives on the district council

  3. PURPOSE OF ASALGP ACTIVITY • Improve and formalise relations between category B and C municipalities • Build capacity amongst councillors and officials • Obtain commitment from the two categories through a protocol document adopted by all parties

  4. PROTOCOL DOCUMENT • Should be based on legislative provisions • Should identify and address the problem areas • Should create sustainable relations • Should direct the activities of municipalities to everybody’s satisfaction • Should be a mechanism for conflict resolution

  5. PROTOCOL DOCUMENT CONTENT • Outlines legislative requirements • Describes the status of the B and C municipalities • Provides for steps to be taken to formalise relations • Provides for institutional structures to formalise relations • Outlines lines of communication between the two categories • Provides guidelines for the co-ordination of the performance of functions • Determines procedures for the approval of capital projects • Defines the role of local municipal councillors on the District Council • Defines dispute resolution procedures

  6. IMPLEMENTATION • Provincial Project Steering Committee guided us • Three pilots in Umkhayakude, Amajuba and Sisonke • Preliminary meetings with Municipal Managers • Generic protocol document sent to all councillors • Separate interactive workshops with District and Local Municipalities

  7. IMPLEMENTATION CONT. • Changes sought by municipalities put into Protocol document • Workshops held on final draft with Exco members • Final document signed by Mayors or their Deputies • Officials from KZN Department of Local Government attended all workshops

  8. ACTIVITY DELIVERABLES • Participation was acceptable • The methodology used worked • Capacity was built both amongst councillors and officials • The needs of each District and Local Municipalities were met • The final protocol document was accepted by all the municipalities except one

  9. ACCEPTABILITY OF THE ACTIVITY • The process addressed a serious need • Legislative requirements are clearly outlined • Inter-government co-operation could be achieved through the implementation of the protocol document • Mutual support through the sharing of resources could be achieved • Relations could improve because they were formalised • Proper communication channels were agreed to

  10. WHAT WAS LEARNED • Relations between B’s and C’s will remain a risk in service delivery • Everybodyagreed to the importance of co-operation and mutual respect • There is great scope for shared resources • Continuous monitoring of the relations is essential • Wrong attitudes can derail co-operation • The implementation of the Protocol document should be initiated by the KZN Department of Local Government • Only in a spirit of co-operative governance will the Protocol serve its purpose

  11. SUSTAINING THE OUTCOMES • Formalisation of co-operation between municipalities is imperative for efficient service delivery • Interactive workshops on the Protocol document in individual municipalities will build capacity amongst councillors • Local Government will benefit if process followed in all District Municipalities in Provinces • Activity plans for that should be developed by Province • Benchmarks for the implementation of Protocols need to be set

  12. SUSTAINING CONTINUED • Agreement needed on who will monitor • Continuous support needed toimproved relations between B and C municipalities • Regular and transparent interaction needed between B and C officials who should be trained for implementation and monitoring • Manage potential conflict between municipalities in service delivery through Protocol documents

More Related