1 / 45

Lindsey Nelson June 2012

Design for the Other 90% and Appropriate Technology: The Legacies of Paul Polak and E.F. Schumacher. Lindsey Nelson June 2012. How can we tell a story about the legacies of these two men?. why what how who.

rory
Download Presentation

Lindsey Nelson June 2012

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Design for the Other 90% and Appropriate Technology:The Legacies of Paul Polak and E.F. Schumacher Lindsey Nelson June 2012

  2. How can we tell a story about the legacies of these two men? why what how who

  3. How can we tell a story about the legacies of these two men?Why does understanding this story matter? why what how who

  4. Paul Polak and E.F. Schumacher: why what how who

  5. Paul Polak and E.F. Schumacher: why what how who

  6. Paul Polak and E.F. Schumacher: why what how who

  7. Paul Polak and E.F. Schumacher: • Design for the Other 90% why what how who

  8. Paul Polak and E.F. Schumacher: • Design for the Other 90% Appropriate Technology why what how who

  9. Posthumous • Extensive timeframe • Diverse geographies • Differing technological profile • Limited personnel access Some Methodological Challenges why what how who

  10. Posthumous • Extensive timeframe • Diverse geographies • Differing technological profile • Limited personnel access Some Methodological Challenges Research Goals • Understand practical consequences of discourse • Compare two discursive approaches critically • Analyze engineering activities • Identify implications for engineering education why what how who

  11. Posthumous • Extensive timeframe • Diverse geographies • Differing technological profile • Limited personnel access Some Methodological Challenges Research Goals • Understand practical consequences of discourse • Compare two discursive approaches critically • Analyze engineering activities • Identify implications for engineering education why what how who

  12. Multimodal Discourse Analysis why what how who

  13. SEMIOTIC RESOURCES language, images, space, technology, models, time Multimodal Discourse Analysis why what how who

  14. SEMIOTIC RESOURCES language, images, space, technology, models, time Multimodal Discourse Analysis SEMIOTIC FORMS workspaces, prototypes, film, assembly drawings, reports, charts why what how who

  15. SOCIAL PRACTICES HUMAN BEINGS Multimodal Discourse Analysis why what how who

  16. SEMIOTIC RESOURCES language, images, space, technology, models, time SOCIAL PRACTICES HUMAN BEINGS Multimodal Discourse Analysis SEMIOTIC FORMS workspaces, prototypes, film, assembly drawings, reports, charts NON-HUMAN ACTORS why what how who

  17. SEMIOTIC RESOURCES language, images, space, technology, models, time SOCIAL PRACTICES HUMAN BEINGS Multimodal Discourse Analysis NARRATIVES SEMIOTIC FORMS workspaces, prototypes, film, assembly drawings, reports, charts NON-HUMAN ACTORS why what how who

  18. MULTIMODAL DISCOURSE SEMIOTIC RESOURCES language, images, space, technology, models, time SOCIAL PRACTICES HUMAN BEINGS Multimodal Discourse Analysis NARRATIVES SEMIOTIC FORMS workspaces, prototypes, film, assembly drawings, reports, charts NON-HUMAN ACTORS why what how who

  19. MULTIMODAL DISCOURSE SEMIOTIC RESOURCES language, images, space, technology, models, time SOCIAL PRACTICES HUMAN BEINGS Multimodal Discourse Analysis Design for the Other 90% NARRATIVES SEMIOTIC FORMS workspaces, prototypes, film, assembly drawings, reports, charts NON-HUMAN ACTORS Appropriate Technology why what how who

  20. We listen to customers ignored by other engineers. Organizational Claims: IDE why what how who

  21. We listen to customers ignored by other engineers. Organizational Claims: IDE why what how who

  22. We listen to customers ignored by other engineers. Organizational Claims: IDE why what how who

  23. We listen to customers ignored by other engineers. Organizational Claims: IDE why what how who

  24. We listen to customers ignored by other engineers. Organizational Claims: IDE why what how who

  25. We listen to customers ignored by other engineers. Organizational Claims: IDE why what how who

  26. We listen to customers ignored by other engineers. Organizational Claims: IDE why what how who

  27. We listen to customers ignored by other engineers. Organizational Claims: IDE why what how who

  28. We listen to customers ignored by other engineers. Organizational Claims: IDE why what how who

  29. We listen to customers ignored by other engineers. Organizational Claims: IDE why what how who

  30. We listen to customers ignored by other engineers. Organizational Claims: IDE why what how who

  31. We develop technologies that challenge world division. Organizational Claims: Practical Action why what how who

  32. We develop technologies that challenge world division. Organizational Claims: Practical Action why what how who

  33. We develop technologies that challenge world division. Organizational Claims: Practical Action why what how who

  34. We develop technologies that challenge world division. Organizational Claims: Practical Action why what how who

  35. We develop technologies that challenge world division. Organizational Claims: Practical Action why what how who

  36. We develop technologies that challenge world division. Organizational Claims: Practical Action why what how who

  37. We develop technologies that challenge world division. Organizational Claims: Practical Action why what how who

  38. We develop technologies that challenge world division. Organizational Claims: Practical Action why what how who

  39. We develop technologies that challenge world division. Organizational Claims: Practical Action why what how who

  40. We develop technologies that challenge world division. Organizational Claims: Practical Action why what how who

  41. Build long-standing community partnerships. Lessons for Engineering Educators why what how who

  42. Build long-standing community partnerships. • Present students with holistic models of poverty. Lessons for Engineering Educators why what how who

  43. Build long-standing community partnerships. • Present students with holistic models of poverty. • Develop informed frameworks for innovation success. Lessons for Engineering Educators why what how who

  44. Build long-standing community partnerships. • Present students with holistic models of poverty. • Develop informed frameworks for innovation success. • Create case studies from real engineering initiatives. Lessons for Engineering Educators why what how who

  45. Design for the Other 90% and Appropriate Technology:The Legacies of Paul Polak and E.F. Schumacher Lindsey Nelson l.nelson@ids.ac.uk Scaffolding Undergraduate Design Educationwith the Wellbeing Framework Wednesday, 2:15pm, room 005

More Related