1 / 11

Natural Gas Drilling in PA

Natural Gas Drilling in PA. Edwina Cunningham-Hill Emanuel Sachse Claire Noone. Two Opposing Interest groups. FOR DRILLING. OPPOSSED DRILLING. COMPANIES INVOLVED WITH THE GAS DRILLING. ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS/ EVIRONMENTALISTS. Gas Drilling Companies Argue That:.

roscoe
Download Presentation

Natural Gas Drilling in PA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Natural Gas Drilling in PA Edwina Cunningham-Hill Emanuel Sachse Claire Noone

  2. Two Opposing Interest groups FORDRILLING OPPOSSED DRILLING COMPANIES INVOLVED WITH THE GAS DRILLING ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS/ EVIRONMENTALISTS

  3. Gas Drilling Companies Argue That: • They Will create jobs Drilling. • Drilling is a good way to boost local economies struck by the economic crisis. (Local communities in these areas will grow exponentially.) • Gas Drilling will make the U.S. less dependent on foreign oil and coal. • Natural gas isn’t perfect but has no huge consequences for the environment that can’t be fixed.

  4. Evidence Of Drilling Companies The total gross value of methane available is estimated at $1.46 trillion and drilling it all can create over a million jobs. (a huge economy boost) At least 1/8th of the methane’s value will go directly to landowners. (stimulating the local economy) The U.S. has twice the amount of Natural Gas, Saudi Arabia has in Oil. Using it would give for Independence from other countries. USA’s Supply of Underground Natural Gas

  5. Environmental Organizations and Environmentalists Argue That: • The hazardous chemicals in the hydraulics of the drilling machines could leak into surrounding (ground-)water. • - Natural Gas is always at high risk for explosions and are put in residential areas. • - The safety measures taken aren’t executed well enough • Drilling harms the environment and that renewable energy should be pursued instead.

  6. Evidence Of Environmentalists 2009, Louisiana, 17 cows found dead after drinking contaminated water. -> Chesapeake Energy was fined $22,000 per cow. Storage tanks are often located near residential areas. Explosions have happened and are probable to continue to happen. Forests are cleared for drilling. Chemical runoff from fracking has been spilled in some places. Natural habitats of wildlife are destroyed. Residents in some areas of drilling have found their water to be flammable due to the leaking of gas into their well water.

  7. What is Natural Gas Drilling? • Hydrofracking (Hydrolic Fracturing): a process in which fractures in rocks below the earth's surface are opened and widened by injecting chemicals and liquids at high pressure: used especially to extract natural gas or oil.

  8. Republicans: Agree • Democrats: Agree • Primary concerns include human and environmental exposure to: • Radioactivity that is a physical characteristic of Marcellus shale. • The hazardous cocktail of hydro-fracking chemicals injected into the ground. • Air pollution from diesel engines, compressor stations, and flaring. • Brine that is 5x saltier than seawater that can damage freshwater streams and lakes, as well as corrode infrastructure. • Hazardous liquid and solid waste that is stored on-site, transported on public roads, and disposed of at municipal landfills or sewage treatment plants.

  9. Pro/Con • Pro: Business to PA • Con: Non-renewable gas—the companies will leave and jobs will disappear • Pro: Gross Value: 1.46 trillion doll-hairs • Con: Pollutes water resources • Pro: Land-owners: receive 2.5 million dollars per well from drillers for using their land and poop. • Con: No tax to help with Environmental issues

  10. Recent Developments • Republican Senator was in the house Nov. 17th voting on Marcellus shell • Democratic Senator Dittian video.

  11. Political Parties • Republican: • Democrat:

More Related