1 / 14

1 IV. 2 groups t-test 3+ groups ANOVA

Group Differences: 1 Independent Variable. 1 IV. 2 groups t-test 3+ groups ANOVA. Theory. IV: male, female DV: happiness There is a difference Due to chance?. Theory. Confidence Interval 95% within interval If Overlap No real differences (non-significant) If no Overlap

rose-harmon
Download Presentation

1 IV. 2 groups t-test 3+ groups ANOVA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Group Differences: 1 Independent Variable 1 IV. 2 groups t-test 3+ groups ANOVA

  2. Theory • IV: male, female • DV: happiness • There is a difference • Due to chance?

  3. Theory • Confidence Interval • 95% within interval • If Overlap • No real differences (non-significant) • If no Overlap • Difference is real (significant)

  4. Theory • Can make significant: • Move points away (larger between group variation)

  5. Theory

  6. Theory • Can make significant: • Smaller intervals (less within group variation)

  7. Theory • Summarizing theory behind “group differences”: between group variation within group variation • Notice how that translates into formulas: T-test: independent T-test: repeated ANOVA (I’ll show you later)

  8. 2 groups • A single pairwise comparison (e.g., males to females) • Is there a significant difference (e.g., p = .025) • What are group means (e.g., 4.84, 5.61) • What is the effect size (e.g., by hand, website)

  9. 3+ groups • Same as before: 95% CI Overlap = n.s. No overlap = sig • Difference: Multiple pairwise comparisons So FIRST see if “overall” Then SECOND test each pairwise

  10. 3+ groups (1) Overall “F” (2) Post-hoc or Planned Comparisons • Overall “F” • F = between group variability within group variability • Can’t simply start with multiple pairwise comparisons because must control for familywise error

  11. 3+ groups (1) Overall “F” (2) Post-hoc or Planned Comparisons • Overall “F” • F = between group variability within group variability • Can’t simply start with multiple pairwise comparisons because must control for familywise error .95 x .95 x .95 =.857 1-.857=.14

  12. 3+ groups (1) Overall “F” (2) Post-hoc or Planned Comparisons • Overall “F” • F = between group variability within group variability • Can’t simply start with multiple pairwise comparisons because must control for familywise error 1 - (1 - )C = 1 - (1 -.05)3=.14 .95 x .95 x .95 =.857 1-.857=.14

  13. 3+ groups (1) Overall “F” (2) Post-hoc or Planned Comparisons • Post-hoc • Testing all possible pairwise comparisons • Control for familywise error (keep alpha=.05) • Many options. I suggest LSD or Tukey • Planned Comparisons • Testing only specific pairwise comparisons • Must be “apriori hypotheses” • Can do one-tailed tests

  14. 3+ groups • Overall F (e.g., p = .003) • Post-hoc (e.g., see table) • What are group means (e.g., see table) • What is the effect size (e.g., by hand, website)

More Related