1 / 14

Theories of Second language Acquisition

Theories of Second language Acquisition. Different models have been proposed: The behaviorist perspective The i nnatist perspective The cognitive/developmental perspective The sociocultural perspective. The Behaviorist Perspective.

rossa
Download Presentation

Theories of Second language Acquisition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Theories of Second language Acquisition

  2. Different models have been proposed: • The behaviorist perspective • The innatist perspective • The cognitive/developmental perspective • The sociocultural perspective

  3. The Behaviorist Perspective • Learning is explained in terms of imitation, practice, reinforcement, and habit formation • It had a powerful influence on second and foreign language teaching between the 1940s and the 1970s. • The Audiolingual method of second language teaching stemmed out of behaviorism: emphasis on mimicry and memorization

  4. Students memorized dialogues and sentence patterns by heart. • Learning a language is a process of habit formation: habits of L1 will surely interfere with the new habits of L2 that the learner wants to form=} Contrastive hypothesis

  5. The Innatist Perspective • Humans are born with innate knowledge of the principles of Universal Grammar: UG • UG allows all children to acquire the language of their environment during a critical period of their development.

  6. Researchers are divided on the applicability of UG to second language acquisition: A. Some think that the UG provides an adequate explanation only for first language acquisition.

  7. Application:Krashen’s Model • It is one of the models that adopt the innatist perspective • It was quite influential in the 1970s. • It emphasizes the role of exposure to comprehensible input in second language acquisition.

  8. It is based on 5 hypotheses: 1. Acquisition/learning hypothesis 2. Monitor hypothesis 3. The natural order hypothesis 4. The input hypothesis 5. The affective filter hypothesis

  9. The Cognitive/Developmental Perspective: Information Processing

  10. Application: The Interaction Hypothesis • It is one of the hypotheses that have emerged within the cognitive developmental perspective. • Claims of the hypothesis: • According to this hypothesis, conversational interaction is an essential, if not sufficient, condition for second language acquisition. • Interactional modification, i.e. modified speech, promotes acquisition.

  11. It makes claims not only about comprehension (processing input), but also about production (output): Corrective feedback during interaction forces learners to produce comprehensible output.

  12. The Sociocultural Perspective • Vygotsky’s theory proposes: • Cognitive development, including language development, arises as a result of social interaction. • Learning occurs how? When an individual • interacts with an interlocutor • within his ZPD ( a situation where the learner is capable of performing at a higher level because there is support from the interlocutor.

  13. According to the theory, second language learners acquire language when they collaborate and interact with other speakers. • Interlocutors co-construct knowledge collaboratively. • Through collaborative dialogues, learners co-construct knowledge while engaging in production tasks that draw their attention to both form and meaning. It is cognitive activity as well as social activity.

More Related