190 likes | 358 Views
Harm Reduction in Prisons An overview of international policy and practice. Rick Lines Harm Reduction International. What do we know about blood-borne infections in prisons?. Rates of HIV/HCV infection in prisons related to two factors. 2.
E N D
Harm Reduction in PrisonsAn overview of international policy and practice Rick Lines Harm Reduction International
What do we know about blood-borne infections in prisons? Rates of HIV/HCV infection in prisons related to two factors. 2
What do we know about blood-borne infections in prisons? 1. Rates of infection in the community outside prison, especially amongst vulnerable populations (i.e., people who use drugs) 3
What do we know about blood-borne infections in prisons? 2. Prevalence of high risk behaviours inside prisons (i.e., sharing injecting equipment) Home-made prison syringe 4
Barriers to Harm Reduction in Prisons • Zero-tolerance/abstinence based approaches to drug use, often more entrenched than outside prisons • Security ethos of prisons: Admission of sex and drug use seen as an admission of security failure • Discrimination against prisoners, people who use drugs and MSM • Lack of legal framework (i.e., for syringe exchange or methadone therapy) • Staff safety concerns • Funding and resources • Poor and overcrowed prison conditions 5
Examples of Harm Reduction in Prisons • Needle/Syringe Programmes • Condoms and safer sex measures • Bleach and disinfectants • Methadone and other substitution treatment • Safer tattooing • Peer Education • Alternatives to prison for people who use drugs • Broader prison reforms that improve conditions and reduce overcrowding 6
Harm Reduction in Prisons:Needle/Syringe Programmes • Switzerland: First programme 1992/93 • Today – PSEP in 7 prisons • Germany: Pilots in 1996 • Today – PSEP in 1 prison (down from a high point of 7 prisons) • Spain: Pilot in 1997 • Today – PSEP approved for all 69 prisons, and programs operating in over 30 prisons • Moldova: Pilot in 1999 • Today – PSEP in 7 prisons • Kygyzstan: Pilot in 2002 • Today – PSEP in all 11 prisons • 2007 – NSP also operating in Armenia, Belarus, Iran and Luxembourg. 7
Prison Syringe Exchange:Models of Distribution – machines Anonymous Syringe Dispensing Machines Lichtenberg Prison Berlin Saxerriet Prison Switzerland 8
Prison Syringe Exchange:Models of Distribution – hand-to-hand Harm Reduction Kit Soto de Real Prison, Madrid 9
Prison Syringe Exchange:Models of Distribution – peer workers Prison Colony 18 Branesti, Moldova 10
Syringe Exchange Evaluations • Scientific evaluations conducted in 11 prisons with syringe distribution programmes • The provision of syringes did not lead to an increase in drug consumption or an increase in injecting • Syringes were not used as weapons, and safe disposal of used needles was not a problem • Syringe sharing disappeared almost completely • In prisons where blood testing was performed,no new cases of HIV or Hepatitis infection were found • Other positive health outcomes 11
Harm Reduction in Prisons:Substitution Treatment • Substitution treatment available in approximately 40 prison systems worldwide • Most western European systems and some central and eastern European systems • Canada and Australia • Iran • Heroin maintenance available in two Swiss prisons since 1995. 12
Prescription Heroin Programme Obershöngrün Prison Switzerland 13
Prescription Heroin Programme Obershöngrün Prison Switzerland 14
Methadone Evaluated:Correctional Service Canada 2001 • Participation in a MMT programme had positive post release outcomes • Opiate users accessing MMT during incarceration were less likely to be readmitted to prison after release and less likely to have committed new offenses than those not accessing MMT • MMT cost effective 15
Substitution Treatment in Prisons:Good Practice & Limitations • Prison policy vs. community policy? Effects on intake and discharge • Detox only? Continuation only? Initiation of MMT? • Perceptions of prisoners and staff are important • One component of a broader harm reduction and drug policy • Limitations • Often limited spaces; limited qualified physicians and participating prisons • Not an effective harm reduction option for occasional/recreational heroin users or cocaine users • No legal framework in many countries 16
Advocating for Policy Change • Zero-tolerance/criminalisation has failed • Harm Reduction programmes are safe • Harm Reduction is evidence-based • Harm Reduction is cost-effective • Promote legal, ethical, human rights • Collaboration • Between prisoners and health professionals • Between organisations • Between countries 17
Kamiti Prison Nairobi, Kenya - 2005 18
Rick Lines rick.lines@ihra.net Harm Reduction International www.ihra.net 19