1 / 14

Who's Misbehavin'?: Improving the Identification Method of the Affiliated Non-Religious

Who's Misbehavin'?: Improving the Identification Method of the Affiliated Non-Religious. Christopher Born The Catholic University of America Christine Brickman Bhutta The Catholic University of America Center for the Economic Study of Religion (GMU). Motivating the Project.

roz
Download Presentation

Who's Misbehavin'?: Improving the Identification Method of the Affiliated Non-Religious

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Who's Misbehavin'?: Improving the Identification Method of the Affiliated Non-Religious Christopher Born The Catholic University of America Christine Brickman Bhutta The Catholic University of America Center for the Economic Study of Religion (GMU)

  2. Motivating the Project • Current research on religious adherents fails in one of two respects: (1) Does not distinguish marginal from active members (2) When distinctions are drawn, uniform criteria across denominations (reltrad) are applied • Missteps lead to: (1) Overlooking relative importance different traditions place on specific beliefs and behaviors (2) Misclassification of respondents (3) “Watering down” of findings both within and across denominations • Examples

  3. New Classification Scheme Goals • Recognize multiple dimensions of religious commitment • Evaluate individuals according to the standards of their specific religious traditions

  4. Goal #1Recognize multiple dimensions of religiosity • Belonging (self-identified, RELTRAD) • Behavior (church attendance) • Belief (view on bible) Himmelfarb 1975, Kellstedt 1993

  5. Goal #2 Be specific to each religious tradition • Consult authoritative church teachings, foundational church documents, and relevant theology • When above is limited, consider what members of a given tradition identify as core components of their religious identity (Mockabee et al 2001)

  6. New Classification Scheme – Catholics • Source: • Attendance: First Precept of the Church • Bible: Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC) • Requirements for active status: • Attendance: 2 to 3 times per month or more • Bible: Cannot identify bible as book of fables • Results: • Active – 40 percent • Marginal – 60 percent

  7. New Classification Scheme: Evangelical Protestants • Source: • Bible: Statement of Faith from the National Association of Evangelicals and evangelical Protestant respondents • Attendance: Importance of baptism and collective worship and importance placed on attendance by evangelical Protestants themselves (Mockabee et al 2001) • Requirements for active status: • Bible: Cannot identify bible as book of fables • Attendance: 2 to 3 times per month or more • Results: • Active – 57 percent • Marginal – 43 percent

  8. New Classification Scheme: Mainline Protestants • Source: • Bible: UMC, ELCA, PCUSA overlapping portions of statement of faith and mainline Protestant respondents • 61 percent of all mainline Protestants fall into above denominations • Attendance: Importance of baptism, Eucharist, and collective worship; and attitudes toward attendance by mainline Protestants (Mockabee et al 2001) • Requirements for active status: • Bible: Cannot identify bible as book of fables • Attendance: Once per month • Results: • Active – 47 percent • Marginal – 53 percent

  9. Group Compositions

  10. Preliminary Analysis • Data: GSS (1988, 1998, 2008) • Limitations exist, but wanted large enough sample • Use RELTRAD to break out denominations (Catholic, Evangelical Protestant, Mainline Protestant) • Explore trends over time: arepeople moving to the margins of the church? • Religious commitment and political affiliation

  11. Percentage of Marginal Members in Each Religious Tradition over Time

  12. Political Affiliations Political Party ID by Religious Tradition: Active and Marginal Political Party ID by Religious Tradition: Active only

  13. Discussion • Challenges of the data • Attendance issues (over-reporting) • Other findings in the data Feedback • We welcome any comments about sources, methodology, criteria, etc. • Any other data sources? • Other items to examine on GSS?

More Related