60 likes | 186 Views
Quad Channel Cooling. David Neuffer Fermilab. Quad Channel. Previously developed by Makino, Johnstone, Errede, Berz In this study, evaluated for Study 2A compatible case using ICOOL. FODO Study2A. Use 1.5m long cell – FODO lattice 60º to 90º/cell at P = 215MeV/c
E N D
Quad Channel Cooling David Neuffer Fermilab
Quad Channel • Previously developed by Makino, Johnstone, Errede, Berz • In this study, evaluated for Study 2A compatible case using ICOOL
FODO Study2A • Use 1.5m long cell – FODO lattice • 60º to 90º/cell at P = 215MeV/c • max = 2.6m;min=0.9 to 0.6m • B’ = 4 to 6 T/m
Simulation Results • Cooling in FODO cells • 2 1cm LiH slabs • Gas H2
Advantages of Quad Channel • No large magnetic fields along the axis • Reduced breakdown problems • Magnets much cheaper • No Amplitude–Momentum correlation in Cooling • No beam angular momentum effects • No preferred absorber location (gas cavity OK) Disadvantages of FODO Quad channel • No low * region • Relatively weak focusing
Use in Study2A? • Replace Cooler with FODO cooler • Solenoid to lattice “match” with 4 quads, ~2m (not well-optimized) With H2 absorbers, similar to Study 2A LiH performance (~10% worse) ECALC9 used, but ECALC9 valid for symmetric (x=y) solenoidal lattices. Would like to use quad lattice in Buncher and Rotator for comparisons To Do Better Matching Extend to Buncher/Rotator