1 / 13

Growing Illinois Keeping Illinois Competitive

Growing Illinois Keeping Illinois Competitive. Message Points Two “Appetites” for Education: Dollars For Education; Skills for our Economy. Daunting demographics are ahead for US/Illinois Workforce Reversing current education trends requires knowledge of problem and will to solve

Download Presentation

Growing Illinois Keeping Illinois Competitive

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Growing IllinoisKeeping Illinois Competitive • Message Points • Two “Appetites” for Education: Dollars For Education; Skills for our Economy. • Daunting demographics are ahead for US/Illinois Workforce • Reversing current education trends requires knowledge of problem and will to solve • Illinois’ biggest appetite deficit???

  2. Education Funding Appetite 1995-2002 Period Highlights • Overall revenue growth from $11.7 billion to $18.6 billion • Smallest overall increase 3.47% (2002) • Largest overall increase 9.36% (1999) • State Spending grew from $3.8 billion to $7.2 billion • Smallest state increase: 5.33% (1996) • Largest state increase: 16.6% (1999)

  3. Education Funding Appetite 1995-2002 Period Highlights • State funding increases by Administration: (Using current administration’s calculation methodology) • Blagojevich Ryan Edgar (2004-2007) (2000-2003) (1996-1999) $3.842 B $4.588 B $3.633 B • State Funding Increases during period: (Using current administration’s calculation methodology $8.523 Billion

  4. Education Funding Appetite---Unequalled Revenue Increases… Education Revenues from 1995 to 2002: (Net to Districts—FS9697; FS0102) 1995 2002 • Federal .759 1.431 • State 3.476 5.367 • Local 8.656 11.121 • TOTAL 12.891 17.920 • INCREASE 1995-2002: 5.029 39%

  5. Education Funding Appetite… And Spending Increases • Education Spending: (Net to Districts—FS9697; FS0102) 1995 total Spending: $13.657 2002 total Spending: $20.228 INCREASE: $ 6.571 48%

  6. Education Funding Appetite1995-2002 Rev/Exp Summary 1995 2002 Increase Revenues 12.891 17.920 5.029 Spending 13.657 20.228 6.571 GAP .766 2.308 1.542 Number of Districts deficit spending: 484 733

  7. Education Funding Appetite— Red Ink in the poorest districts… • Of the 48 Illinois School Districts with the Lowest Equalized Assessed Value per pupil (EAVPP) • In 1995: 29 had budget deficits • In 2002: 39 had budget deficits

  8. Education Funding Appetite— …and Red Ink in the Richest Districts • Of the 50 Illinois School Districts with the Highest EAVPP • In 1995: 21 had budget deficits • In 2002: 36 had budget deficits

  9. Education Funding Appetite Operating Expenditures per pupil • Unprecedented growth in state spending raised the spending in the lowest spending districts 1995 2002 Diff % Lowest 3,342 $4,829 $1,487 44%

  10. Education Funding AppetiteOperating Expenditures per pupil • But the highest spending districts grew too: 1995 2002 Diff % Highest $16,260 $20,173 $3,913 24% • Leaving an even larger spending gap: 1995 2002 Highest $16,260 $20,173 Lowest $ 3,342 $ 4,829 Difference $12,918 $15,344

  11. Education Funding AppetiteFunding to Performance--2004 • The lowest spending district: • Central District 51 $4,438 per pupil • The Highest spending district: • Rondout $23,799 per pupil • Meets/Exceeds Math Reading Science • Rondout Central Dist 51 84% 90%

  12. Education Funding AppetiteToday’s increase at tomorrow’s cost • Increases in Education Spending FY2006 FY2007 $330 Million $415 Million • Teacher Pension Funding Cuts: FY2006 FY2007 $523.9 Million $495.1 Million

  13. Education Funding AppetiteSummary • During the highest revenue growth period EVER for Illinois Schools: • Spending outpaced revenues at even greater rates • The number of districts deficit spending increased; with deficit spending increasing more in high spending districts than low spending districts • Gaps between lowest and highest spending districts deepened, with student performance in the lowest spending district as good as—or better—than student performance in the highest spending district. • FY06 and FY07, Administration boasts education increase of $745 million, yet cut teacher pensions by $1.02 billion.

More Related