150 likes | 218 Views
European Union Action COST 347 Improvements in Pavement Research with Accelerated Load Testing. Andrew Dawson (Nottingham Center for Pavement Engineering) Vice-chairman. Overall Objective is to. develop a European code of good practice to optimise the use of ALT facilities
E N D
European Union ActionCOST 347Improvements in Pavement Researchwith Accelerated Load Testing Andrew Dawson(Nottingham Center for Pavement Engineering)Vice-chairman
Overall Objective is to .... • develop a European code of good practice • to optimise the use of ALT facilities • to improve the application of their results • to improve the efficiency & quality of ALT use • to make research results available and useable • to the benefit of owners of ALT facilities • to the benefit non-owner organisations
Structure ..... 1/2 1 Inventory Characteristics, Instrumentation, Pavement condition evaluation 2 Previous and current research in the field of ALT Materials, ALT, Performance models, Pavement design, Socio-economic considerations 3 ALT versus RLT 4 Common code of good practice Existing facilities & Future facilities
Structure ..... 2/2 5 Future use of ALT Alternative and new materials New measurement techniques Maintenance works Environmental issues 6 Dissemination
Austria Belgium Switzerland Czech Republic Denmark Spain Germany France Finland Greece Hungary Iceland the Netherlands Romania Sweden Slovenia United Kingdom
APT, ALT, AST & RLT ! • APT = Accelerated Pavement Testing • ALT = Accelerated Load Testing • AST = Accelerated Scale Testing • RLT = Real-time Load Testing COST 347 is addressing each of these
following on from PARIS • 11 countries provided:720 test sections • 615 flexible • 105 semi-rigid • 4 countries provided:196 sections available for detailed study • 165 flexible • 31 semi-rigid
in 1995 • Running costs: • RLT = 2 million Euro / annum • ALT = 1.5 million Euro / annum (8 countries)
RLT - benefits • Economic • Real (!) • rate of loading • traffic • climate • subgrade
RLT - drawbacks • Slow to deliver results • Can be victims of political/funding changes • For reasons of safety: • Limited distress possible • Non-severe deterioration only • Uncontrolled • climatic effects (temperature, moisture ... ) • traffic irregularities
distress traffic / time Analysis • Analysis differs for ALT / RLT / AST • Cracking • S-curve response in ALT ... logistic model • RLT early response affected by aging • RLT response stops early • so linear model for middle • Rutting • linear (or power) for RLT • linear for ALT unless greater rut depths
Specific ALT & AST contributions … 1/2 • comparing alternatives • novel materials • environmentally desirability • recycled components • surface noise • generation of surface wear debris • clogging of porous surfacings • maintenance techniques • supporting legislative decisions on traffic • e.g. 115kN axle in Accession Countries
Specific ALT & AST contributions … 2/2 • supporting asset management • understanding initiation of distress • deriving distress propagation models • defining key performance indicators • defining performance based specifications • studying surface sign wear
COST347’s input • COST 347 will propose how best to address these • using ALT and AST (alongside RLT) • using best historic approaches • by defining future best-practice • targetted to the present issues listed above
Find out more ! • Visit www.pave-test.org • Home to COST347 and A2B09