170 likes | 446 Views
Background. 2007 audit of Literacy practice EC2008 - goal to develop a K-6 approach to Literacy improvement - whole staff participation in First Steps Training- Reading /Writing - PL begun to unpack First Steps Reading - structures put in place for regular coll
E N D
1. Mowbray Heights Primary School Our Journey (so far)
Raising the Bar & Closing the Gap
2. Background
2007 audit of Literacy practice EC
2008
- goal to develop a K-6 approach to Literacy
improvement
- whole staff participation in First Steps Training-
Reading /Writing
- PL begun to unpack First Steps Reading
- structures put in place for regular collection and analysis
of external/internal data
Term 3, 2008-Inclusion as a Group 3 school for RTB&CTG funding. A planning process was initiated with staff K-6.
3. School Improvement Plan 2009Priority 1 To deliver the key goals of the Literacy Plan
increased leadership capacity
increased teacher capacity
increased learning outcomes for students
extend the home /school partnership.
Focus- Reading
The RTB&CTG Core Beliefs and the MHPS Literacy Plan are stated within the Hill & Crevola framework, Design Elements for a Whole School Approach: Leadership, Professional Learning Teams, Standards and Targets, Classroom Teaching Programs, School and Classroom Organization, Intervention, Monitoring and Assessment, Home, School & Community Partnerships
4. Research base
Breakthrough-Fullan, Hill, Crevola
Learning Centred Leadership Model-National College for School Leadership
Closing the Achievement Gap-Fogarty
Guiding Readers and Writers- Fountas, Pinnell
When Kids Cant Read-What teachers do!-Beers
Best Practice in Literacy Instruction- Gabrielle, Morrow, Pressley
First Steps Reading-Addressing Current Literacy Challenges
5. SO how did we know where the staff was at? Conducted a series of PL sessions:
- Students learn best when
- During a reading program
students need opportunities to
- Important elements of a reading
program are
Developed focus questions:
- How can literacy resource teachers best support/enhance
your teams reading programs?
- What possibilities are there?
- How best can you use resources and timetabling structures to
support implementation of these ideas?
- On what does your team need to further investigate/seek
further clarification?
Made links with our work on unpacking First Steps Reading
Achieved whole school agreement on a set of non-negotiables
6. Our Non -negotiables
There are three things that will happen in every Reading
lesson, Prep to Year 6, in our school. (In Kinder the focus is on
oral Literacy through imaginative play.)
1. Thorough teaching of the Focus Reading Strategies
( Reading Strategies Sequence for year levels)
2. Guided Reading will be used in every classroom
3. Home Reading Program for all students below Level 30
7. Setting up teams
Leadership Team
Principal- Lead the project
AP -critical friend/ICT link/Data support
AP -EC leader/ 1/2 team/ Kinder/Prep team
AP/AST -Primary leader/ 5/6 team
Literacy teacher/ AST- 3/ 4 team
8. Setting up teams
Literacy Team
APx2
RTB&CTG Literacy teacher
Resource teacher
ESL teachers x2
Prep literacy teacher
Library resource teacher
Li L teacher
Year group teams
Kinder/Prep
Year 1/2
Year 3/4
Year 5/ 6
9. Structure Literacy Leadership Team meets regularly
Teams: K/Prep, Year 1/2,Year 3/4, Year 5/6
All literacy/ support staff directed to RTB&CTG Literacy Initiative
A Literacy leader works with each team
Quarantined reading hour in school timetabling
Literacy rich physical environment
Team planning meetings weekly
Focussed but different journey for each team
Whole school PL Sequence comprising weekly staff meeting/SF Days/Award days etc
Attendance at RTB&CTG Network Meetings and relevant PL opportunities provided by LS North
Preparation of regular Parent/Carer Information Sheets to assist parents/carers to support their children at home
Regular sharing with School Association and P&C
10. K-6 NUTS and BOLTS Explicit teaching of reading strategies
Commitment to focussed reading time 4/5 times weekly
Emphasis on explicit teaching and whole, small, whole instruction
Systematic collection and analysis of data (internal & external)
Whole school assessment schedule
Consistent and daily celebration of reading progress
Increasing teacher capacity by Literacy teacher modelling best practice and through provision of resource and planning support
Gradual release of responsibility by slowly increasing teachers responsibility for teaching newly acquired skills
Individual coaching sessions and Literacy teacher planning one-on-one with colleagues
Attendance at all RTB&CTG Network Meetings and PL
11. Waves of support / intervention
WAVE 1 =All students are included in a daily high quality literacy block
WAVE 2 = WAVE 1 + additional, time limited, tailored intervention provided for small targetted groups to increase progress both within/outside the reading hour
WAVE 3 = WAVE 1 + individualized programs for students needing intensive support (e.g. significantly below NMS or with high and additional needs.) Interventions are highly personalized to meet the individual needs of small numbers of students experiencing literacy difficulties
12. What is the crucial role of leadership?
Modelling
Monitoring
Dialogue
13. Modelling
Demonstrating the new skill (whole)
Building credibility-what you say is what you can do
Finding texts-interesting and engaging to get teachers and learners underway
Gradual release of responsibility to teach new skills
Co-planning waves of support for students
Responsibility for small group teaching
Modelling of practice to be used in classrooms through PL
Coaching individuals
14. Monitoring
Regular team meetings for planning
Colleagues observing each other at work and providing feedback
Knowing staff needs/PL needs
Sustaining the focus over time
Setting timeframes to collect data
Collegially reviewing the data together and asking the Why questions
Preparing students to be able to be able to confidently describe their learning and their learning goals
Feedback/Walkthroughs
15. Dialogue
Focussed conversations about learning
Posing questions about data and other evidence collectively gathered
Listening carefully to determine where individual support is needed
Demonstrating interest and modelling that teaching matters
Building knowledge and skills across a series of people
Building leaders
Teams critically reflecting on daily practice and planning
Talking confidently to parents about successes and areas for improvement
16. Where to for MHPS in 2010? Keep faith in the plan, revisit, review, refine, refocus
Maintain high quality Reading instruction
Focus on Writing- PL and modelling in classrooms
Continued emphasis on data collection and analysis
Emphasis on feedback. Introduce more formal walkthroughs
Our challenge
Ensure that our students play an active part in what has been learned, what needs to be learned, and in monitoring their own progress
Ensure that good communication and a sense of partnership grows between all involved in the childs learning, especially with parents and carers
17. In conclusion
So have we
increased leadership capacity?
increased teacher capacity?
increased student learning outcomes?
extended the home/school partnership?