1 / 17

Two-level Factorial Designs

Two-level Factorial Designs. Bacteria Example: Response: Bill length Factors: B: Bacteria (Myco, Control) T: Room Temp (Warm, Cold) I: Inoculation (Eggs, Chicks) . Two-level Factorial Designs. +. 41.71. 40.78. W. 40.37. 40.21. Temp. 40.23. 38.95. C. Bacteria. C. 39.77. 39.19.

sabin
Download Presentation

Two-level Factorial Designs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Two-level Factorial Designs • Bacteria Example: • Response: Bill length • Factors: • B: Bacteria (Myco, Control) • T: Room Temp (Warm, Cold) • I: Inoculation (Eggs, Chicks) Yandell, B. (2002) Practical Data Analysis for Designed Experiments, Chapman & Hall, London

  2. Two-level Factorial Designs

  3. + 41.71 40.78 W 40.37 40.21 Temp 40.23 38.95 C Bacteria C 39.77 39.19 E Inoculation C M Cube Plot

  4. Estimated Effects • For a k-factor design with n replicates, the cell means are estimated as • We can write any effect as a contrast; interaction contrasts are obtained by element-wise multiplication of main effect contrast coefficients.

  5. Estimated Effects • The resulting contrasts are mutually orthogonal. • The contrasts (up to a scaling constant) can be summarized as a table of ±1’s.

  6. Orthogonal Contrast Coefficients

  7. Estimated Effects • If we code contrast coefficients as ±1, the estimated effects are: • These effects are twice the size of our usual ANOVA effects.

  8. Estimated Effects • The sum of squares for the estimated effect can be computed using the sum of squares formula we learned for contrasts

  9. Estimated Effects • Bacteria Example B effect=(39.19+38.95+40.21+40.78-39.77-40.23-40.37-41.71)/4 =-.7375 SSB=(-.7375)2x2=1.088 • The entire ANOVA table for this example can be constructed in this way

  10. Testing Effects • With replication (n>1) • Without replication (k large) • Claim higher-order interactions are negligible and pool them • For k=6, if 3-way (and higher) interactions are negligible, 42 d.f. would be available for error

  11. Testing Effects • Without replication--Normal Probability Plots • If none of the effects is significant, the effects are orthogonal normal random variables with mean 0 and variance

  12. Testing Effects • Because the effects are normal, they are also independent • IID normal effects can be “tested” using a normal probability plot (Minitab Example) • Yandell uses a half-normal plot • You can pool values on the line as error and construct an ANOVA table

  13. Testing Effects • Lenth (1989) developed a more formal test of effects. • Denote the effects by ei, i=1,…,m. • We say that the ei’s are iid N(0,t2), where t is their common standard error.

  14. Testing Effects • Lenth develops two estimates of the common standard error, t, of the ci’s:

  15. Testing Effects • Though both are consistent estimates, PSE is more robust • The following terms are used to test effects

  16. Testing Effects • The df term was developed from a study of the empirical distribution of PSE2 • ME is a 1-a confidence bound for the absolute value of a single effect • SME is an exact (since the effects are independent) simultaneous 1-a confidence bound for all m effects

More Related