Pre-Award: Budget Development for Grants & OCGA Updates

1. Pre-Award: Budget Development for Grants& OCGA Updates UCLA School of Nursing Research Support Team October 29, 2012

2. The Purpose of Budgets • Demonstrate that PI has considered all costs of achieving the specific aims and project goals • Dedicate effort and resources to the project • Delineate budget categories which must be adhered to (±25%) once the project is underway • Describe the scientific necessity of every line item

3. Timeline for Successful Budgets • Three months before due date • Develop Specific Aims • Meet with Statistics Consultation Group to develop power analysis and study size, statistician effort (if applicable), data management plan • Develop project timeline • What is the project duration? • Who is involved? Does effort fluctuate? • Enrollment timeline? • Analysis timeline?

4. Timeline for Successful Budgets • Two months before due date • Identify personnel and performance sites • Rough draft of budget and justification • One month before due date • Final budget and justification

5. Timeline for Successful Budgets • Secure special arrangements earlier • Permission to exceed direct cost limitation? • Subawards to other Institutions? • Projects with an international component? • Quotes for equipment, consultants, vendor agreements? • Mandatory cost sharing? • Program income?

6. Budget Foundations Just- ification Describe necessity Cost categories Effort, subcontracts, other costs Project goals & specific aims What is feasible/necessary to achieve goals? Program announcement Scope? Cost/category limitations? Modular or line item budget?

7. Direct and Indirect costs • Direct Costs identified with a particular sponsored project and directly assigned to that project with a high degree of accuracy Examples: scientific/technical personnel effort, project supplies, subject renumeration, scientific/technical computers • Indirect Costs For common or joint objectives which cannot be identified specifically with a particular project Examples: clerical effort, office supplies, general purpose computers

8. Direct Cost Categories • Personnel: define effort devoted to the project • Materials and supplies • Travel (PI to study sites, conferences) • Consultants • Equipment • Subawards • Other costs • Define categories and atypical line items at outset to ensure allowability when project is underway • Subject renumeration, TIF, fee remission, animal research, pharmacy costs, rent, project-specific office-type supplies, telephones, mailing, copying, machines (<5k), core services

9. Personnel Determinations • Personnel comprise the largest part of grant budgets • 2% escalation per NOT-OD-11-068 • All personnel have a project role, duties, and effort • Senior/Key Personnel • individuals who contribute to the scientific development or execution of the project in a substantive, measurable way • Current staff or TBN? • Actual salary/benefits vs institutional scales

10. Project roles: Senior/Key • Multiple PI • Requires Multiple PI leadership plan • Co-Investigator • Requires stated effort/salary • Faculty Collaborator • Other Significant Contributor • Effort is “as needed”

11. Subaward, Vendor or Consultant? • Subawards are the most common mechanism for collaboration with another site that brings intellectual value to the project. They have discrete, fully-formed budgets authorized by an institutional official. • Vendor Agreements are established when a site performs work (assays, sample processing) on a fee-for-service basis. No intellectual contribution. • Consultants are non-UCLA individuals who perform fee-for-service work at a fixed rate; always requires a letter of support stating the rate, scope and expertise; compliant with SB1467 “Public Contracts: Conflict of Interest.”

12. Human and Animal Subjects • Protocol defines timepoints and processes for subject renumeration which must be included in the budget • Approvals must be in place before award can be issued • Start work on the protocol before award is issued to ensure the project is not delayed or restricted

13. Financial Characteristics of Contracts & Grants • Defined performance period • Ongoing reporting – progress, effort and technical reports • Auditable financial reports

14. Financial Characteristics of Contracts & Grants • Most research grants are cost-reimbursable • Specific scope of work • Unobligated funds returned to agency • Some contracts (clinical trials, subcontracts for services) are fixed-rate • Funds provided for services rendered • Unobligated funds retained under Policy 913 • Research Office will advise PI regarding the contract type

15. Federal Costing Principles • OMB A-21 • Should I charge this to my grant? • Allowability- Does the agency or announcement prohibit certain costs? • Allocability-Is the expense tied directly and proportionally to the project? • Reasonableness- Are the cost and units reasonable in light of the study aims and scope of work? • Consistency- Are the costs consistent across projects and campus units? • OMB A-110 • Competitive procurement • Report submission and records retention • Prior approval for rebudgeting beyond established thresholds

16. Managing Project Expenses • Partnership between PI, requestor, purchaser and grant analyst to adhere to principles and facilitate timely correction • Continuous, dynamic, collaborative review • Review Process • Research Office provides ad hoc, real-time reports on expenditures • PI defines steps to align expenses with budget and goals • Fund manager and requester take action • Repeat

17. Managing Project Expenses • By approving a purchase, PI certifies that the expense is necessary, directly benefits and is used exclusively for the project • Use exception processes sparingly or never • Out-of-pocket expenses, cost transfers, sole-source purchases • Expenses >90 days old cannot be moved to or between research projects (NIH GPS 7.5)

18. Examples of reporting flags • Categorical variances ± 25% • Rebudgeting into/out of IDC-exclusion categories • Effort variances • Unallowable/misattributed items • Carryforward >25% to continuation year

19. Reporting • Effort reports • PI submits reports quarterly • Prevents overlap and ensures effort is consistent with stated levels • Personnel effort must be ≥ pay • Prior approval required if senior/key effort decreases >25% from proposed effort • Three reporting points: Other Support page, All Personnel Report, Effort Reporting System

20. Reporting • Progress reports • Submitted to agency annually to secure continuation funding • Publications? Results? Project delays? Changes to project? Enrollment? Effort? Carryforward over threshold? • Sloppy reports are frequently returned and will delay continuation funding

21. Pre-Award: OCGA Updates UCLA School of Nursing Research Support Team October 29, 2012

22. OCGA Reorganization Proposal and Award Intake Teams Created Grant Analysts Grants and Cooperation Agreements Grant Officers Contracts, Incoming Subs, and Multi Campus Agreements New Assistant Director Grants and Cooperative Agreements

23. OCGA Proposal Intake Process Proposal Intake Team receives all proposals to review Team reviews documents for completeness Complete application Minimum documents Less than minimum some level of review possible Incomplete/insufficient Systematic reminders will be issued to follow-up on missing documents

24. OCGA Proposal Requirements Minimum for Review Completed EPASS with PI signature Sponsor guidelines All sponsor forms requiring OCGA signature Final budget with budget justification Brief description of proposal aims or proposal abstract Subaward Documents (if applicable)

25. OCGA Proposal Requirements Review, Approval, and Submission Completed EPASS with all required signatures * Sponsor guidelines Final Proposal (budget, science, agency required signatures, biosketches, etc.) Subaward Documents (if applicable) * Signed/Completed COI disclosure (if applicable) For PHS agencies or agencies that have adopted PHS regulations, all investigators report in eDGE *

26. PHS Conflict of Interest Regulations Applies to all research supported by PHS agencies (NIH, CDC, AHRQ, etc.) Applies to non profits that have adopted the PHS COI regulations (American Heart Association, American Cancer Society, Susan G. Komen, etc.) Regulations apply to proposals submitted and awards received on or after August 24, 2012.

27. UCLA Electronic Disclosure Gateway (eDGE) By law, the PI and other Investigators must disclose their significant financial interests to UCLA before a proposal can be submitted Disclosures are required for all research awards, including some that previously did not require disclosure (i.e. conference, equipment, or training grants) Could be found at: https://coi.research.ucla.edu Help Desk for eDGE: 310-206-8546 or rpchelp@research.ucla.edu

28. UCLA Electronic Disclosure Gateway (eDGE)

29. UCLA Electronic Disclosure Gateway (eDGE)

30. OCGA EPASS Form Replaced the Goldenrod EPASS has been mandatory since September 1 The PI/CoPI signature(s) on the EPASS incorporate required PHS certification NIH/PHS PI signature Form is no longer needed Utilizes dropdowns and hyperlinks Form could be found at: http://www.research.ucla.edu/ocga/Forms/EPASS_Form.pdf

31. OCGA EPASS Form

32. OCGA EPASS Form

33. OCGA EPASS Form

34. OCGA Subrecipient Requirements Prior to proposal submission subs need to submit: Statement of work Budget and budget justification Subrecipient Commitment Form Subrecipient Commitment Form Now incorporates new PHS COI regulations Form could be found at: http://www.research.ucla.edu/ocga/Forms/Sub_Commitment_Form_revSept_2012.pdf

35. Subrecipient Commitment Form

36. Subrecipient Commitment Form

37. Subrecipient Commitment Form

38. Summary • Budgets and expenses are a function of the project goals and specific aims • Budgets should be as realistic as possible to minimize post-award changes • PI and departmental coordinators are jointly responsible for adhering to costing principles and managing project expenses • OCGA form/process changes reflect the revised PHS funding regulations.

39. Summary • Proposal submission tips: • Familiarize yourself with UCLA Policies, Procedures, and Forms (as well as Sponsor Application Instructions and Forms) • Alert the SON Research Office regarding all upcoming submissions • Meet deadlines for a successful submission • Start Early!

40. Questions? • Slides will be available on the web (click Research, Past Presentations) • Email researchoffice@sonnet.ucla.edu