480 likes | 487 Views
Explore the challenges and opportunities in boosting research productivity in family medicine, with a focus on the need for producing scholarly work. Discusses barriers, funding, impact on FM questions, and future recommendations.
E N D
Family Medicine and Scholarly Activity: The Need to Move from Consuming to Producing Arch G. Mainous III, PhD Presentation to USAFP Annual Meeting March, 2007
If we knew what it was we were doing, it wouldn’t be called research, would it? Albert Einstein
Limited Research Productivity in Family Medicine • 1977--Geyman argued that an FM research base was essential to the specialty • Most assessments of research in FM have not shown much progress even among academics • 92% of STFM members did not author a Medline article in 1999 • 50% of FM residencies produced no publications in 3 years (2002-2004)
Limited Success in Grant Funding • 2003 data from NIH • 149 NIH grants were given to 45 of 110 FM departments • 61% of FM grant PIs were not full-time family medicine faculty • 35,000 applications were submitted to NIH • Success rate in 2003 was 30% • 2007 NIH expects 50,000 applications • Expected success rate for 2007 is 20%
Impact of FM Research on FM Questions • Review of POEMs in JFP 4/1/2001—4/1/2006 • 428 total articles used to answer the clinical question • 8 were authored by investigators in Family Medicine departments • 7 were published in Family Medicine Journals
Recommendations of Future of Family Medicine Project • “Enhancing the Science of FM” • Participation in generation of new knowledge incorporated into FM training • Practice-based research • Academic departments will do collaborative research • Need for new federal funding agency • Increase funding of AHRQ to $1 billion per year
Views of Primary Care Research • Prevailing view is for research to focus on “what is done in primary care” • Another view is to focus on “who is seen in primary care”
Accomplishments of Erasmus Darwin • One of the first formal theories of evolution • Creator of talking machine • Designed a horizontal windmill
Barry Marshall Robin Warren
Studies on “How We Do Things” • Continuity of Care • Continuity and risk of future hospitalization • Value of continuity among doctors in US, UK and Netherlands • Overuse of antibiotics • Antibiotics prescribed for the common cold • Length of visit and antibiotic prescriptions • Quality of Care • Continuity and quality of care for diabetes • Impact of acculturation on diabetes care for Latinos
Studies on “Who we See” • Risk Stratification of Undifferentiated Patient Population • Evaluation of biomarkers as CHD risk factors (CRP, insulin resistance) • Evaluation of impact of prehypertension • Undiagnosed diabetes and complications • Behavior of Patients and Implications for Health • Can one be “fat but fit”? • Latinos’ use of antibiotics without a prescription
Evaluation of Importance of Prehypertension • JNC 7 made a new recommendation to consider the condition of “prehypertension” • Controversial and not much data to support this recommendation • We knew that prehypertension is associated with development of hypertension • We didn’t know if there is an independent risk associated with having prehypertension • Time for a study!!
Evaluation of Importance of Prehypertension • Study 1—Evaluation of independent risk of prehtn on CVD mortality (NHANES II cohort) • No independent risk • Study 2—Evaluation of independent risk of prehtn on CVD morbidity (NHANES I cohort) • Independent risk but basically just “borderline htn”
Editorial on Prehypertension and CVD Morbidity Article • Lee Green, member of JNC 7 panel said • “Well-done studies from several populations and using varying research methods are essential to assessing the validity of the JNC 7 recommendations.” • “Liszka et al’s analysis is technically exemplary; more importantly, it is clinically representative of the patients we see in daily practice.”
Other More Exotic Questions for Study • Fiber supplementation and its impact on systemic inflammation • Role of Telomeres with Insulin Resistance and Coronary Disease in Health Care Disparities
Extreme was his skepticism to human truth Anna Seward discussing Erasmus Darwin
Ideas for Scholarship • What do we know & what don’t we know
Ideas for Scholarship • What do we know & what don’t we know • Observations from practice
Ideas for Scholarship • What do we know & what don’t we know • Observations from practice • Questions from the literature • Stuff you read • Presentations at meetings • Questions at journal club
Ideas for Scholarship • What do we know & what don’t we know • Observations from practice • Questions from the literature • Stuff you read • Presentations at meetings • Questions at journal club • Observations of the environment your patients live in
Funding for Research • Big funders • NIH, AHRQ, CDC, AHA, ADA, RWJ • Advantages: A)More money, B) overhead funding, C) variety of types of grants, D) high prestige • Disadvantages: A) Very Competitive, B) almost impossible without track record and infrastructure
Funding for Research • Little funders • AAFP-F, USAFP, small foundations, local hospital • Advantages: A) Not so competitive, B) short proposal, C) may be oriented to local issues • Disadvantages: A) Modest amount of money and usually no salary support, B) little to no overhead funding, C) low prestige
Lack of Time and Research Skills • Lack of time is a BIG barrier
Lack of Time and Research Skills • Lack of time is a BIG barrier • Lack of research skills is a barrier but maybe not as much as a lack of ideas and time
Lack of Time and Research Skills • Lack of time is a BIG barrier • Lack of research skills is a barrier but maybe not as much as a lack of ideas and time • Potential Solution—Collaborate • Academic colleagues • Practice based research networks
NAPCRG Consultants Directory • Contact information for consultation in more than 80 methodological topics • Content expertise can be found in the special interest groups • Currently there are 73 consultants • Average more than 16 years of research experience • Directory lists which roles the consultant is willing to play • www.napcrg.org (you have to be a member to access the directory)
Practice Based Research Networks • AAFP National Research Network (grew out of ASPN) • Largest network with 334 clinician members • The Federation of Practice-Based Research Networks (FPBRN), established in 1997 • 50 member networks and 5 US affiliate networks • EHR related networks like PPRNet
Take Home Messages • Much of the intellectual base of family medicine is created by folks outside of family medicine • Time to draw upon intellectual resources in family medicine • Everyone can play a role in developing new knowledge • Don’t be afraid to get involved • New discoveries are part of improving care
The world is not governed by the clever men, but by the active and energetic. Erasmus Darwin