Safety Committee Meeting July 22 2019 Meeting 21

1. Safety Committee Meeting July 22 2019 Meeting 21

2. Roll call • UNLTD • Embry Riddle University • Sarcos • Qualcomm • RE’FLEKT • NIST • Northrop Grumman • PTC • Boeing • MTC • PEREY Research & Consulting • Iristick • Marquette University • Medtronic • Welsh Water • ExxonMobil

3. As participants in this meeting, we need to be mindful of the constraints of antitrust laws. • There shall be no discussions of agreements or concerted actions that may restrain competition. • This prohibition includes the exchange of information concerning pricing, rates, coverages, market practices or any other competitive aspect of an individual company’s operation. • Each participant is obligated to speak up immediately for the purpose of preventing any discussion falling outside these bounds. Antitrust Policy

5. Summary of Committee agreements

6. Summary of outstanding actions

7. Summary of completed actions

8. Summary of completed actions

9. AREA AR Safety Playbook

10. Brainstorm – what questions would a Safety Manager have? Possible starter list from Greg (Boeing)? – Use Assessment Tool e.g. High traffic Crush issues Electric issues Visibility in confined space

11. Brainstorm – what questions would a Safety Manager have? Two views of the infographic: • Someone trying to understand the impact of AR safety issues • Description of key categories • Purpose = for companies thinking of implementing AR • For ecosystem • Part of the playbook – detailed set of safety questions for an assessment • Based on AREA HF & Safety research framework • Purpose = evaluating Safety issues and mitigate actions! • For members

12. AREA Safety Committee Research Priorities

13. AREA Safety Committee webinars

15. 36 registrants • 14 attendees • Avg Attendance Rating – 39% • Avg Attentiveness – 42% • Multiple emails thanking the AREA for great content

16. 15 mins Brainstorm – AREA Safety “Certification” ideas

17. Next Meeting • Tuesday 24th September 2019 – 11hr to 12hr ET

18. Appendices

19. Recap - AREA Safety Guidelines • Full agreement that the AREA should create a set of AR Safety Guidelines / playbook for its members • Members of the Safety Committee are already creating this for their own organisation • AREA can support the members by proving wider industry knowledge and expertise • Next step (9th Jan) is to brainstorm different categories / headings for the playbook (objective is to create a framework) • Agreed (currently) to keep the playbook for AREA members only (teaser for the ecosystem) • Once content is created – Committee will decide who / how we will communicate to global safety organisations

20. Agree objective of doc / playbook • Set of instructions (for non familiar staff) who need to evaluate the safety aspects / risk hazards of an AR solution. • Creates consistency / same checks done • Source of knowledge transfer / share best practice & things to consider • Easily updated / added to • Provide expert contact when more information needed

21. Scope (including industry and use case specifics?) Provide what are the benefits / reasons to follow this playbook • (e.g. less injuries), (its been completed), What are you costs for doing this • (e.g. may be doing an assessment – environment, digital model) Keep generic – no need be specific about industry & use case Need to link to internal document AND external references (e.g. AREA infographic) and research and PPE and local work instructions Need to be clear on type of solution (e.g. assisted V augmented v projection – wearable v handheld) It’s a guide (not an assessment tool per say)

22. Target users of the document(s) Potential global differences • Europe – looking for enterprises to drive safety playbook – therefore innovators / end users are initial targets (who will work with safety professional) • USA – focused on Safety Profession who will review and signoff (from a safety perspective) the AR solution 2nd group • Regulator (OSHA???, HSE)?

23. Share any templates / drafts / current docs used

24. Instructions – information needed for infographic update As we discussed in the meeting on 4/4, we need more information for the new interactive infographic design Each of the following tabs map to a cell on the infographic (with the exception of "tools for assessment"). We have included some information for each cell but there are still some blanks. Please fill in any information you have to eliminate these empty areas (denoted as light blue cells) Areas to focus on include: Benefits for all cells, AR experience Risks, Cognition Risks and potential fixes for issues, Sensory Risks and potential fixes for issues, Environment Risks, Physical Risks, Device and Accessories Risks. If you have any additional information (for a blank cell or not) please add it to this document