1 / 43

In the name of God

In the name of God. Summer School. Influenza Unit, Pasteur Institute of Iran summer 2012. PROTEINS Assay Methods (Protein quantitation ). B.Farahmand. Summer School. INTRODUCTION.

Download Presentation

In the name of God

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. In the name of God

  2. Summer School Influenza Unit, Pasteur Institute of Iran summer 2012

  3. PROTEINSAssay Methods(Protein quantitation) B.Farahmand Summer School

  4. INTRODUCTION • Proteins are highly complex natural compounds composed of large number of different amino acids.

  5. Amino acids Summer School

  6. Summer School

  7. Levels of Protein Organization • Primary structure = linear chain of amino acids • • Secondary structure = domains of repeating structures, such as β-pleated • sheets and α-helices • • Tertiary structure = 3-dimensional shape of a folded polypeptide, maintained by disulfide bonds, electrostatic interactions, hydrophobic effects • • Quaternary structure = several polypeptide chains associated together to form a functional protein Summer School

  8. Summer School

  9. خصوصیات فیزیکوشیمیایی پروتئینها • شکل • اندازه • بارالکتریکی Summer School

  10. Protein Estimation is a part of any laboratory workflow involving protein extraction, purification, labeling and analysis.

  11. METHODS OF PROTEIN ESTIMATION • Biuret method • Folin- Lowry method • Bradford method • Bicinchoninic method • UV method • Flourimetric method • Kjeldahl method • Mass Spectrometry Colorimetrc assay Summer School

  12. Chemistry of Protein Assays • Copper-based Protein Assays: • Biuret Protein Assays • Lowry Assay • BCA Protein-copper chelation and secondary detection of the reduced copper • Dye-based Protein Assays: • Coomassie (Bradford) Assay Protein-dye binding and direct detection of the color change associated with the bound dye Summer School

  13. BIURET TEST By reducing the copper ion from cupric to cuprous form, the reaction produces a faint blue-violet color Summer School

  14. Biuret Test • Adventage • Reproduciple • Very few interfering agents (ammonium salts being one such agent ) • Fewer deviations than with the Lowry or ultraviolet absorption methods • Disadventage • Requires large amounts protein (1-20mg) • Low sensitivity Summer School

  15. Folin-Ciocalteu ( Lowry ) Assay Step 1 Step 2 Summer School

  16. Comparison of Lowry and Biuret Summer School

  17. Bicinchoninic method Summer School

  18. BCA Test • Adventage • The color complex is stable • There is less suceptibility to detergents • Fewer deviations than with the Lowry or Beradford methods • Disadventage • Bicinchonic acid is expensive Summer School

  19. Dye-Binding ( Bradford ) Assay • CBBG primarily responds to arginine residues • (eight times as much as the other listed residues) • If you have an arginine rich protein, • You may need to find a standard • that is arginine rich as well. • CBBG binds to these residues in the anionic form • Absorbance maximum at 595 nm (blue) • The free dye in solution is in the cationic form, • Absorbance maximum at 470 nm (red). • Bradford, MM. A rapid and sensitive for the quantitation of microgram • quantitites of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248-254. 1976. • Stoscheck, CM. Quantitation of Protein. Methods in Enzymology 182: 50-69 (1990). Summer School

  20. Mechanism of Dye response and interference in the Bradford protein assay Anionic dye Protonated or cationic amino acids Summer School

  21. Dye-Binding ( Bradford ) Assay • Adventage • Fast and inexpensive • Highly specific for protein • Very sensitive [1-20 µg (micro assay) 20-200 µg (macro assay)] • Compatible with a wide range of substances • Extinction co-efficient for the dye-protein complex is stable over 10 orders of magnitude (assessed in albumin) • Dye reagent complex is stable for approximately one hour • Disadventage • Non-linear standard curve over wide ranges • Response to different proteins can vary widely, choice of standard is very important Summer School

  22. Comparison of standard curve of Bradford, Lowry and BCA assay • Absorption spectra of anionic and cationic forms of the dye overlap. So the standard curve is non-linear. • The assay performs linearly over short concentration stretches. Summer School

  23. Selecting a Protein Assay & a Standard protein Summer School

  24. Important criteria for choosing an assay include: • Compatibility with the sample type and components • Assay range and required sample volume • Protein-to-protein variation • Speed and convenience for the number of samples to be tested • Availability of spectrophotometer or plate reader necessary to measure the color produced (absorbance) by the assay Summer School

  25. Selecting a Protein Standard • If a highly purified version of the protein of interest is not available or it is too expensive to use as the standard, the alternative is to choose a protein that will produce a very similar color response curve in the selected protein assay method and is readily available to any laboratory at any time. Summer School

  26. Examples of Standard Protein • Generally, bovine serum albumin (BSA) works well for a protein standard because it is widely available in high purity and relatively inexpensive. • Alternatively, bovine gamma globulin (BGG) is a good standard when determining the concentration of antibodies because BGG produces a color response curve that is very similar to that of immunoglobulin G (IgG). Summer School

  27. Standard Protein Selection Summer School

  28. Protein-to-Protein Variation • Each protein in a sample responds uniquely in a given protein assay. Such protein-to-protein variation refers to differences in the amount of color (absorbance) obtained when the same mass of various proteins is assayed concurrently by the same method. These differences in color response relate to differences in: - amino acid sequence, - isoelectric point (pI), - secondary structure - and the presence of certain side chains or prosthetic groups. • Depending on the sample type and purpose for performing an assay, protein-to-protein variation is an important consideration in selecting a protein assay method and in selecting an appropriate assay standard (e.g., BSA vs. BGG). Protein assay methods based on similar chemistry have similar protein-to-protein variation. Summer School

  29. Methods Summer School

  30. Biosafety in protein assays • Wear Gloves and Labcoat • MSDS (Material Safety Data Sheet) Folin reagent, Phosphoric acid, …… Summer School

  31. Standard Curve Summer School

  32. Standard Curve preparation A750nm Summer School

  33. Comments for standard preparation • For greatest accuracy in estimating total protein concentration in unknown samples, it is essential to include a standard curve each time the assay is performed. • This is particularly true for the protein assay methods that produce non-linear standard curves. • Deciding on the number of standards and replicates used to define the standard curve depends upon the degree of non-linearity in the standard curve and the degree of accuracy required. • In general, fewer points are needed to construct a standard curve if the color response is linear. • Typically, standard curves are constructed using at least two replicates for each point on the curve. Summer School

  34. Sample Preparation for Protein Assays • it must be solubilized • inhibit microbial growth • avoid casual contamination of the sample by foreign debris such as dust, hair, skin or body oils. • After filtration or centrifugation to remove the cellular debris, typical samples will still include nucleic acids, lipids and other non-protein compounds. • nonprotein components (detergents, biocides or antimicrobial agents , protease inhibitors, different salts, denaturants, reducing agents and chaotropes) are critical for choosing an appropriate assay Summer School

  35. Strategies for interfering substance elimination • Choose a different protein assay method or a version of the same assay method that includes components to overcome the interference. • Dialyze or desalt the sample to remove interfering substances that are small (i.e., less than 1000 daltons), such as reducing agents. • Precipitate the protein in TCA or other appropriate reagent, remove the solution containing the interfering component, and then redissolve the protein for analysis. Summer School

  36. Instrument for Lowery assay Summer School

  37. Instrument for Bradford assay Summer School

  38. Calculations and Data AnalysisNote: • With most protein assays, sample protein concentrations are determined by comparing their assay responses to that of a dilution-series of standards whose concentrations are known. Protein samples and standards are processed in the same manner by mixing them with assay reagent and using a spectrophotometer to measure the absorbances. The responses of the standards are used to plot or calculate a standard curve. Absorbance values of unknown samples are then interpolated onto the plot or formula for the standard curve to determine their concentrations. Summer School

  39. Unknown sample concentration calculation • Direct calculation Absorbance values of unknown samples are then interpolated onto the plot • Indirect calculation formula for the standard curve to determine their concentrations. Summer School

  40. Indirect calculation Summer School

  41. Indirect calculation • C= Concentration • OD= Optical Density • tgα=Slope of standard curve • tgα=∆Cs/∆ODs • CX = tgα × ODX Summer School

  42. Comments • Obviously, the most accurate results are possible only when unknown and standard samples are treated identically. This includes assaying them at the same time and in the same buffer conditions, if possible. Because different pipetting steps are involved, replicates are necessary if one wishes to calculate statistics (e.g., standard deviation, coefficient of variation) to account for random error. • Although most modern spectrophotometers and plate readers have built-in software programs for protein assay data analysis, several factors are frequently misunderstood by technicians. Taking a few minutes to study and correctly apply the principles involved in these calculations can greatly enhance one's ability to design assays that yield the most accurate results possible (see the related Tech Tips and links). Summer School

  43. Aquire Specialty to Take Opportunity Thanks

More Related