130 likes | 150 Views
Explore the implementation of Thin Layer Agar for Mycobacterium culture in rural Kenya with Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) support since 2000, focusing on the TB program, integrated TB/HIV care, and the establishment of a TB culture laboratory in 2007. Details include methods, results, challenges, achievements, and cost analysis.
E N D
Implementation of Thin Layer Agar for Mycobacterium culture in rural Kenya Médecins Sans Frontières
MSF support in the Hospital Since 2000 TB program ART program Integrated TB/HIV care TB culture laboratory in 2007 MSF support in the periphery Mobile clinic to 3 health centres Supply drugs 6 month regimen Context Homa Bay District • Rural area • 350,000 habitants • 30% HIV prevalence
Context TB patients • 1,500 new TB cases/year in District • 400 new TB cases in Chest Clinic • 80% HIV/TB co-infected HIV patients • 13,000 active patients on care • 10,000 active patients on ART
Methods • Mycobacterium culture laboratory • Techniques: Thin Layer Agar, Lowenstein-Jensen • Routine activity since November 2007 • Patients targeted • Patients with cough >2 weeks and at least 2 negative sputum smear microscopy • Retrospective study • Period of the study: 15th Nov 07 to 25th July 08
Methods • TLA technique: • Solid culture (7H11) • Petri dish (2 parts: 1 normal media; 1 with PNB) • Incubator CO2 • Reading with microscope • Why this technique was chosen? • Less logistics, maintenance, technical problems • Lower cost • Solid culture – less contamination expected, bio-safety
Comparison Mycobacterium culture techniques * Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 10 (6):613-619, 2006. Robledo et al
Results • Culture result available in 365 patients: 50% negative, 31% positive, 19% contaminated • 56% of culture positive had not started treatment • Out of the 63 patients traced: • 46% found and started on treatment • 11% found and referred to the closest TB site • 16% had died • 13% could not be found • 14% were still being traced
Results • Patients missed through clinical algorithm and started on treatment after culture: • 29 patients = 3.5 patients per month • Patients diagnosed through clinical algorithm: • 265 = 31.9 patients per month • Proportion of TB patients diagnosed through culture: 10.9% • Average time to get a positive result: 24 days
Results Culture results on smear negative samples from Nov 07 to Jul 08
Discussion - Achievements • Almost a third of the TB suspect patients with negative smear were found positive by culture • More than a half of them had been missed through clinical algorithm • Culture had allowed the diagnosis of 11% of the total TB patients • Time for positive results long but improving
Discussion - Challenges • Cost of the laboratory • Contamination rate currently high • Electricity: back-up system required • Keeping the laboratory clean: change shoes, windows closed, dust coats, etc. • Training of the laboratory technicians is long • BSC maintenance: technician coming from SA
Discussion - Challenges Expenses for TB culture laboratory (Jan 07-Sept 08) TOTAL expenses : 280 000 € 17% 48,5 K€ 28% 77,8 k€ 30% 83,6 k€ 25% 70 k€ Construction Equipment Consumable Staff
Conclusions • Routine culture may have an important impact in the diagnosis of TB in a high HIV prevalence setting • Is it cost-effective to set up a culture laboratory in an African rural context? Other alternatives? • TLA has a potential in peripheral settings compared with others techniques (MGIT, LJ)