1 / 8

R ural D evelopment P rograms in Slovakia

R ural D evelopment P rograms in Slovakia. Short report by Daniel Lešinský. CEPTA - Centre for Sustainable Alternatives. SLOVAKIA: - inhab.: 5,4 mil - area: 4,9 mil ha = 109 inhab./km² - 50% ihab. live in rural areas - agriland: 49,7% - forests: 40,8% - altitude:

sana
Download Presentation

R ural D evelopment P rograms in Slovakia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Rural Development Programs in Slovakia Short report by Daniel Lešinský CEPTA - Centre for Sustainable Alternatives

  2. SLOVAKIA: - inhab.: 5,4 mil - area: 4,9 mil ha = 109 inhab./km² - 50% ihab. live in rural areas - agriland: 49,7% - forests: 40,8% - altitude: 64 - 2 655 m.a.s.l RDPs in Slovakia Daniel Lešinský, CEPTA

  3. RDP 2007 – 2013 in Slovakia • creation period – partnership principle? • budget development (2nd axis) – 2005 = 62%, 2006 – 52%; 2007 – 48,5% (AE+FE – only 14,4%) 24 measures in Slovak RDP 2007-13: 1. LFA – 26,84% (II. axis) 2. Farm modernization – 16,25% (I. axis) 3. AE measures (10 sub-measures) – 13,7% (II. axis) 4. Increasing the added value of products – 7,98% (I. axis) 5. Diversification towards non-agricultural activities – 4,77% (III. axis) ! 18. Forest-environmental measures – 0,69% (II. axis) 22. Natura 2000 and WFD – 0,07% (II. axis) = NO 23. Natura 2000 in Forests – 0,07% (II. axis) = NO 24. Semi-subsistent farms – 0,05% (I. axis) RDPs in Slovakia Daniel Lešinský, CEPTA

  4. RDP 2007 – 2013 in Slovakia problems -1 : - rural abandonment - LFA – keeping the country but for what costs and what results (in Slovakia)? - 2nd axis, protection of rural - green areas. Moving the abandoned meadows? (oil…). Conservation or succession? – for discussion RDPs in Slovakia Daniel Lešinský, CEPTA

  5. RDP in Slovakia problems -2 : - Minimum support for sustainable forestry (despite 40% of SK area) - Bureaucratic obstacles – moneyafter more than 1 year after the application = administration is absolutely insufficient // per-payments - Enviro impact of all axes not just II-nd. The (actual) need: As horizontal principle,implementation of 1-3 axis +L missing eco/enviro criteria / conditions for selections of recipients EU funds. Positive example: measure –„Increasing added value of forests“ (Natura areas 60%, other 50% financing) RDPs in Slovakia Daniel Lešinský, CEPTA

  6. RDP 2007 – 2013 in Slovakia problems -3 - Integrated production (IP) – need but not cheat, (clear pro-environmental standards, clear public-interests targets, as 0 pesticides/agro-chemicals residues in food and water) versus organic - Biofuels, bio-enegy! - aforestration (intensity!) – we need clear standards for sustainable getting of biomass (dendromass, phytomass + other agri-sources) - tobacco subsidies, tobacco sector!!! RDPs in Slovakia Daniel Lešinský, CEPTA

  7. Thank you for your attention

  8. High Tatras, national peak - Krivaň

More Related