380 likes | 524 Views
SECTION 2 Staffing the Organization. Human Resource Management TENTH EDITON. Robert L. Mathis John H. Jackson. Legal Framework for Equal Employment. Chapter 4. PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook. © 2003 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved. Learning Objectives.
E N D
SECTION 2StaffingtheOrganization Human ResourceManagementTENTH EDITON Robert L. Mathis John H. Jackson Legal Framework for Equal Employment Chapter 4 PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook © 2003 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Learning Objectives • After you have read this chapter, you should be able to: • Differentiate among diversity management, equal employment opportunity (EEO), and affirmative action. • Discuss the key provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, and define five basic EEO concepts. • Give examples of three sex-based discrimination issues. • Discuss the major requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. • Describe four other types of EEO discrimination. © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Learning Objectives (cont’d) • Discuss the two general approaches for complying with the 1978 Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures. • Define validity and reliability, and explain three approaches to validating employment requirements. • Identify typical EEO record-keeping requirements and those records used in the EEO investigative process. © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Diversity, Equal Employment, and Affirmative Action • Diversity • The variety of dimensions differentiating people • Equal Employment Opportunity • Individuals should have equal treatment in all employment-related actions. • Protected Class • Individuals within a group identified for protection under equal employment laws and regulation. • Race, ethnic origin, color • Gender • Age • Disability • Military experience • Religion • Marital status • Sexual orientation © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Diversity Management, Equal Employment Opportunity, and Affirmative Action Figure 4–1 © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Affirmative Action • Affirmative Action • A process in which employers identify problem areas, set goals, and take positive steps to enhance opportunities for protected-class members and to remove the effect of past discrimination. • Reverse Discrimination • Occurs when a person is denied an opportunity because of preferences give to protected-class individuals who may be less qualified. • Cases • Hopwood v. State of Texas • Bakke v. University of California © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Major Equal Employment Laws and Concepts • Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII • Coverage • All private employers with 15 or more employees • All educational institutions • State and local governments • Public and private employment agencies • Labor unions with 15 or more employees • Joint labor/management apprenticeship committee • Established the Equal Opportunity Commission to enforce the act’s provisions. © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Concepts Resulting in Equal Employment Opportunity Figure 4–2 © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Business Necessity and Job Relatedness • Business Necessity • A practice that is necessary for safe and efficient organizational operations. • Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications (BFOQ) • A business characteristic providing a legitimate reason why an employer can exclude persons on otherwise illegal bases of consideration. • Disparate Treatment • A situation that exists when protected-class members are treated differently from others. © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Business Necessity and Job Relatedness • Disparate Impact • Occurs when substantial underrepresentation of protected-class members results from employment decisions that work to their disadvantage. • Griggs vs. Duke Power (1971) decision: • Lack of intent to discriminate is no defense if discrimination occurs. • The employer has the burden of proof in proving that an employment requirement is a “business necessity.” • Retaliation • EEO laws prohibit employers from taking punitive actions against individuals who exercise their legal rights. © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Civil Rights Act of 1991 • Significant provisions: • Employment practices must be job-related and consistent with business necessity. • Plaintiffs must identify particular employment practice and show that protected-class status was a factor in the employment practice. • Provided limited compensatory damages for intentional discrimination. • Allows plaintiffs to seek jury trials. • Prohibited norming and use of alternative scoring based on protected class membership. • Extended EEO coverage to U.S. citizens overseas. © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Affirmative Action Regulations • Executive Orders 11246,11375, and 11478 • Requires holders of federal contracts not to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, or sex and to develop affirmative action plans. • Office of Federal Contract Compliance (OFCCP) in the Department of Labor enforces these presidential orders. • Affirmative Action Plan (AAP) • Formal document that an employer compiles annually for submission to enforcement agencies. © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Components of an Affirmative Action Plan (AAP) Figure 4–3 © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Laws on Sex/Gender Discrimination © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Sex/Gender Discrimination • Pay Equity (Comparable Worth) • The concept that pay for jobs requiring comparable levels of knowledge, skill, and ability should be paid similarity, even if actual duties differ significantly. • Arises from the continuing gap between the earnings of women and men. • Courts have consistently ruled against the concept. • Sexual Harassment • Actions that are sexually directed, are unwanted, and subject the worker to adverse employment conditions or create a hostile work environment. © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Major Sections of the Americans with Disabilities Act Figure 4–4 © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Other Employment Discrimination Acts © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Other Types of Discrimination © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Other Types of Discrimination © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Equal Employment Charges by Type Figure 4–5 © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Enforcement Agencies • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission • EEOC is the enforcement authority for EEO laws. • Composed of five members appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. • Members (limited to no more than three from the same political party) serve seven year terms. • Office of Federal Contract Compliance • OFFCP ensures that federal contractors have nondiscriminatory practices and take affirmative action to overcome the effects of past discrimination. © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Internal Disparate Impact Figure 4–6 © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures • “No Disparate Impact” • Disparate impact occurs whenever a substantial underrepresentation of protected-class members is evident in selection decisions. • 4/5ths Rule • If the selection rate for a protected-class is less than 80% (4/5ths) of the selection rate for the majority group or less than 80% of the group’s representation in the relevant labor market, then discrimination exists. © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
External Disparate Impact Source: Figure 4–7 © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Job-Related Validation Approach • Validity • The extent to which a test actually measures what it says it measures. • Reliability • The consistency with which a test measure measures an item. • Employment “test” • Any employment procedure used as the basis for making an employment-related decision. • Must have both reliability and job-related validity. © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Validity and Equal Employment • Selection Procedures and Validity • Employers must demonstrate that tests of knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) are valid when disparate impact exists. © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Validation Strategies: Content Validity • Content Validity • Validity as measured by a logical, nonstatistical method (job analysis) to identify the KSAs and other characteristics necessary to perform the job. • Example: A work sample test measuring how well an applicant performed essential tasks of the job. © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Validation Strategies: Criterion-Related Validity • Criterion-Related Validity • Validity measured by a procedure that uses a test as the predictor of how well an individual wool perform on the job. • Correlation coefficient • Index number giving the relationship between a predictor (a test) and a criterion variable (a measure of success on the job). Criterion (Job Success) Predictor (test score) © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Concurrent and Predictive Validity Figure 4–8 © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Validation Strategies: Construct Validity • Construct Validity • Validity showing a relationship between an abstract characteristic (e.g., honesty) and job performance (e.g., bank teller). • A form of validity that is more likely to be challenged for legality and usefulness in the selection process. © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Elements of EEO Compliance EEO PolicyStatement EEORecords EEOCompliance Pre-employment vs. After-Hire Inquires EEOC Compliance Investigation Process Employer Responses to EEO Complaints © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Stages in Responding to EEO Complaints Figure 4–9 © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Guidelines to Lawful and Unlawful Preemployment Inquires Source: Developed by Robert L. Mathis, Mathis & Associates, L.L.C, 1429 North 131st Avenue Circle, Omaha, NE 66154. All rights reserved. No part of this may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without written permission from Mathis & Cole. Figure 4–10a © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Guidelines to Lawful and Unlawful Preemployment Inquires (cont’d) Source: Developed by Robert L. Mathis, Mathis & Associates, L.L.C, 1429 North 131st Avenue Circle, Omaha, NE 66154. All rights reserved. No part of this may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without written permission from Mathis & Cole. Figure 4–10b © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Guidelines to Lawful and Unlawful Preemployment Inquires (cont’d) Figure 4–10c © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.
Guidelines to Lawful and Unlawful Preemployment Inquires (cont’d) Figure 4–10d © 2002 Southwestern College Publishing. All rights reserved.