1 / 53

Author: Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb Version date: 14 Nov 2017

Author: Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb Version date: 14 Nov 2017

Download Presentation

Author: Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb Version date: 14 Nov 2017

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Author: Netherlands Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb Version date: 14 Nov 2017 Content: This lecture describes Clinical Pharmacological aspects of ADRS, by R. van Eekeren, PharmD, The Netherlands. This lecture can be used for teaching key aspect 2,3,4: preventing, recognizing, managing ADRs.

  2. Clinical pharmacology of adverse drug reactions Course Pharmacovigilance 2017 Drs R (Rike) van Eekeren Pharmacist

  3. Learning objectives • In this lecture, you learn to- apply the pathophysiologic principles that underlie to the occurrence of side effects • Characterize adverse drug reactions based different formats:- type A/B classification- DoTS classification • Discuss which patients have an increased risk of developing side effects

  4. Dosis sola facit venenum “All substances are poisons; there is none which is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a poison and a remedy” Paracelsus (1493-1541)

  5. Classification system 1 Exemple:Beta-blocking agents  1◦ dizziness, hypotension  2◦ Raynaud phenomena, dyspnoea in astma

  6. Pharmacologic ADRs

  7. Classification system 2: Type A/B B “Bizarre” • Idiosyncratic • Rare • Serious • Not detected in clinical trials A “Augmented” • Pharmacological effect • Dose dependent • Occurs frequently • Often detected in clinical trials Talbot J, Waller P. Stephen’sdetection of new adverse drug reactions. 5e editie, 2004. John Wiley &Sons Ltd. Chichester. P.92

  8. Type A drug related Dose dependent Reversible Disappears after dose reduction or cessation of therapy Rechallenge often positive

  9. Type B patient related Not dose dependent Sensibilization may be needed Reduction of dose often no effect on ADR Treatment is often needed Dechallenge positive

  10. Type B patientrelated • Allergic / immunological reactionsExamples: Blood: seriousblood disordersLiver: hepatitisKidney: nephritisLung: pneumonia, alveolitis Skin: urticaria, angioedema, anaphylaxis • Otherpatient-related factors- Idiosyncrasy (undefinedsusceptibility)- Genetic factors (enzymedeficiencies, HLA-types)

  11. AB types: No sharp distinction? When we do not know the exact mechanism:- Nausea in antibiotics  type A, but unknown pharmacology? When the immune systems is triggered by toxicity mechanism- Toxic hepatitis  Often, auto-immune component after initial hepatocellular damage In pseudo-allergy: allergic-like symptoms due to pharmacological effect- ACE-inhibitor induced angio-edema Time relationship?  ADR’s after chronic use…Patient susceptibility?  Why some patients develop ADR

  12. AB classification to G

  13. Classification ADRs • Text • Text • Text • Text Mydriasis by amitriptyline Type? A(ugmented)

  14. Classification ADRs Suppression of Hypothalamus-Pituitary- Adrenal cortex- axis (HPA) due to corticosetroids Type?C(hronic)

  15. Classification system 3: DoTS • Do Doserelatedness • T Time relatedness • S Susceptibility

  16. Dose relatedness • Effects of medicines are based on interactions between chemical substances, to which law of mass action is applicable • Even for immunological disorders like- Hay Fever!- Desensitisation- Allergic skin reactions

  17. Dose relatedness Alternativeclassificationrelatestoreactionsthatoccur in • Supra-therapeutic doses (toxicdose) • Standard therapeutic doses (collateraleffects) • Subtherapeutic doses (allergicreactions)

  18. Time relatedness Time-independent reactionscanoccur at any time; independent of theduration of the treatment  treatthecauseifpossible • Change in concentration at site of action- Dose- Renalfunction- Drug interaction (kinetic)- … • Whenpharmacological response altersduetoothercauses- Comorbidity- Ageing- Drug interaction- …

  19. Timing • Time dependentreactions • Rapidreactionsonlywhen a drug is administeredrapidly- Red man syndrome on vancomycin-  administerslowly • First dosereaction. In particular, at first dose, notnecessarilytherafter- Hypotension ACE inhibitors, alfa-1-blockers  precautionsfor 1st dose- Type I allergicreactions  avoid re-exposure

  20. Timing • Early reactions- early in treatment but then disappears through adaptation (tolerance)- Example: nitrate-dependent headache predictable, monitor, reassurance of patient • Intermediate reaction. Risk increases at first (days to month) and than diminishes- Hypersensitivity reactions II-IV- Venous thrombo embolism – antipsychotic drugs  monitoring not needed after risk period  withdraw drug if reaction develops  susceptible population

  21. Timing • Late reaction. The risk of the onset of the side effect increases with time- Osteoporosis in use of corticosteroids- Tardive dyskinesia at dopamine antagonists asses base-line function, monitor during treatment- Withdrawal reactions (like myocardial infarction after discontinuation of ß-blockers)  withdraw slowly • Delayed reaction- Especially after prolonged use or repeated exposure- Increased risk of breast carcinoma after the use of estrogens in menopause  avoud drug of screen; counseling patient

  22. Individualsusceptibility Risks of an adverse reaction depends on various factors such as • Age • Seks • Genetic factors • Renal function • Hepatic function • Exogenous factors

  23. From: Aronson 2003

  24. Children

  25. Drug therapy in young children Tan et al. MJA 2003

  26. Adverse drug reactions in children • Different patterns compared to adults • Sometimes higher frequency- Liver failure and valproate- Stevens Johnson Syndrome and lamotrigine • Alterations in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

  27. Pharmacokinetics in children DevelopmentalPharmacology – Drug Disposition, Action, andTherapy in InfantsandChildren Keams GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Alander SW, Blowley DL, Leeder JS, Kauffman RE, NEMJ 2003

  28. Pediatrics: absorption

  29. Pediatrics: distribution

  30. Pediatrics: metabolism

  31. Pediatrics: excretion

  32. Pharmacodynamics • Increased or decreased sensitivity • Antihistamines: central stimulating effects • Benzodiazepines: paradoxical effects • Ketotifen: aggressive/hyperactive behaviour • Cyclosporin: High immunosuppressive response • Effects of growth and development

  33. Elderly

  34. Drug therapy in theelderly • Aging process differs among individuals • Aging of various tissues may differ (within individuals) • Multiple morbidity • Polypharmacy (interactions) • Long term use of drugs • Compliance • Practical problems

  35. ADRs in elderly 5-6% of all hospital admissions are preventable

  36. ADRs in elderly JAMA. 2003;289:1107-1116.

  37. Changes in function elderly Body composition Homeostasis e.g.- Temperature control- Orthostasis- Control of thirst Changes in tissues and organs (more vulnerable)

  38. Pharmacokinetics: absorption Reduced motility of the oesophagus Local irritation of tablets (bisphosphonates) pH increase Slower gastric emptying Longer transit time intestine

  39. Pharmacokinetics: distribution • Decrease in musclemass decrease in lean body mass • Lipophilicsubstances have greaterdistribution volume  plasma concentrationinitally low • Hydrophilicsubstances have smaller distribution volume  highertoxicityand more side effects • Albuminconcentrationhardly changes (decreasedbyunderlying disorders)

  40. Elimination by liver Volume decreases, reduction of phase I reactions - Enzyme levels decreased - Especially CYP 1A2 and 3A4 Reduction of blood flow hepaticarteryand portal vein - Clearance of drugs with high first pass effect reduced - e.g. Propranolol 45% andmorphine 35%

  41. Elimination by kidney In about 1/3 of theelderly no deterioration of renalfunction In 2/3 changes occurdueto i.e.- Cortical area - Numberanddensity of glomeruli - Lengthand volume of proximaltubuli - Vascular changes

  42. Kidney function and age Stevens et al. NEJM. 2006;354 (23): 2473

  43. Pharmacodynamics • Changes may occur in:- Receptor density- Receptor structure- Propagation of signals • Sensitivity for various drugs- Increased (): psychiatric drugs, opioids, dopamine, agonists, parasympaticolytics- Decreased (): ß-blockers and insulin

  44. ADRs in elderly: risk of falling • Balance is complex mechanism controlled by- Vestibular system, Vision, Proprioception (orientation and movement), Muscle responses • Falling may occur due to- Cardiovascular effects: Orthostatic effects - Inadequate response due to vasodilatation - Reduction in function of baroreceptors - Insufficient fluid intake - α- or ß blocking agents, duiretics, ACE inhibitors, … • Psycho active drugs- Sedation, dizziness, confusion- Effect on extrapyramidal system- Muscle relaxants (benzodiazepines)

  45. Psychoactive agents and falls Neth J Med2005;36:91-96

  46. ADRs in elderly: thermoregulation • Problems in thermoregulation- Homeostasis for maintaining core temperature is changed- Ability to increase temperature (shivering) - Risk for hypothermia/poikilothermia • Antipsychotics may increase risk!

  47. ADRs in elderly: cerebral function • Loss of neurons and receptors for cholinergic transmission • Additional neurologic disorders (i.e. stroke) • Anticholinergic drugs may influence cerebral function to large extent

  48. Summary: DoTSand basic aspects • Dose- Pharmacological mechanism- Drug properties • Time • Susceptibility- Patient properties- Pharmacodynamics- Pharmacokinetics

More Related