620 likes | 937 Views
eLearning in Korean Education - A Vision of New Digital Pedagogoy Including uLearning. 2007. 6.4. Sungho Kwon Hanyang university skwon@hanyang.ac.kr. Table of Content. eLearning in Korea. Cyber Home Learning System. Future of eLearning. eLearning in Korea.
E N D
eLearning in Korean Education - A Vision of New Digital Pedagogoy Including uLearning 2007. 6.4 Sungho Kwon Hanyang university skwon@hanyang.ac.kr
Table of Content eLearning in Korea Cyber Home Learning System Future of eLearning
Implementation Stage of e-Learning Initial infrastructure developing stage ICT-basededucation stage e-learning stage u-learning stage 1 PC per 1 teacher internet access in all classrooms nationwide Enhance Teaching-learning method sanitation of educational information Personalized learning course Self-directed learning Creative learning 2006~ 2004~
e-Learning Stage Mid 1990s Late 1990s In the Future 2000s Cyber Home Learning System On-Line Communication School Edunet u-School • Serving Web-based education resources, mainly ICT materials for teaching in classroom • Serving Web-based education resources , mainly learning materials for self study • Community services (Blogs, Caf’es, Web Boards) • Running 9 model classes (K-12) • Based on wireless network with personal mobile devices (TPC, PDA, UMPC) • A community service on public CMC network (DACOM) • Using usually private schools • Evolved individual school home page and community
National e-Learning Project Beyond e-learning Korea Develop outstanding human resources through the promotion of e-learning Reform and revisions to public education through elearning Nurture key human resources through the creation of an e-Cluster Regional integration through the creation of an e-Community Develop vocational schools throughelearning Create policy implementation network for elearning Build institutional infrastructure for elearning Foster elearning mindset
Number of Students per 1PC • Primary School (1st-6th Grade)
Number of Students per 1PC • Secondary School (7th-9th Grade)
Number of Students per 1PC • Secondary School (10th-12th Grade)
Types of eLearning • Traditional teaching and learning • Sometimes adapting web board, blog, or online chatting for collaboration • Blended learning • Mixed with in-class session and on-line session • eLearning • Self study with online learning material without meeting instructor nor classmates • Ubiquitous learning • Based on ubiquitous technology with mobile device (TPC, PDA, UMPC)
National Teaching-Learning Center- EDUNET (www.edunet.net) Integrated search • Personalized knowledge • (customized service) • Integration of educational resources Teacher Student • K12 • College • Special • Teachers • Head teachers • librarians Central Knowledge Ware House eCRM/CMS EDUNET Regional Parents Administrator • Principle • Supervisor • Policy makers • Children Edu. • Life-long Edu. School • Interchange between • community & school • Facilitate interchange • of all stakeholders Collabo- ration • Quality contents • service Integrated educational Content nationwide(KEM2.0) Increase quality of educational service
National Teaching-Learning Center- EDUNET (www.edunet.net) Parents Teachers H.S. Students Others M.S. Students Elem. Students EDUNET Subscribers (Dec. 2005) (6%) • Subscribers (7%) 412,000 Teachers 753,000 Elem. Students (16%) (46%) 1,090,000 Middle School St. High School St. 963,000 H.S. Students (18%) (13%) Parents 367,000 • Total Subscribers : 5,910,000 • 100% of all teachers • 35% of all students • Total Population of Korea : 49,000,000 Others 2,304,000
Digital Library System (dis. edunet.net) Regional Offices of Education Library administrative assistant service inter-organizational information exchange Digital Library System Index service Reading assistant service Internet-based One-Stop Library Service Library Support class materials, Reading assistance Index development & operation Search, problem solving • Librarian • Student • Teacher
Educational Resources Sharing System School DLS • Primary • Middle • High • Special Educational Resources Sharing System • Expand creation and distribution • Utilization of educational knowledge Specialized Institutions Regional Office of Education School Homepage • KICE • KRIVET • KEDI • KISE • Education Science • Institutions • Training agency • ICT Agency National Standard of Educational Metadata
eAdministration System : NEIS (www.neis.go.kr) Parents & Citizens N E I S Ministries & Organizations • Certificate Service, etc. • DB Use (Educational Statistics & Policies, Student Records, etc.) MOEHRD Sharing DB (Resident Registration No. School Registration Status, etc.) Security Internet MOEHRD Statistics DB Internal Administration DB • Policy Making • Analysis on Policy Implementation & Educational Statistics Index DB School Administration Planning Qualification Exam Corporate Body MPOEs • Management & Analysis of Policy Implementation • Budgeting, Personnel Mgnt, Facility Mgnt, etc. Public Relations Lifelong Education Facilities Internet Internet Laws Assets Health Regional Offices of Education (ROEs) Audit Civil Defense Equipment Sub-Local Offices of Education Asset registration Physical Education Budget • Implementing Policies • Budgeting, Personnel Mgnt, Facility Mgnt, etc. Statistics Teaching Staff Mgnt Finance Educational Administration DB Public Service DB Public Authen- tication Administrator Mgnt School Finance Admission Schools School Meals Salary Supervision • Academic Affairs • School Finance, Facility Mgnt, Meals, etc. Internet Academic Affairs Civil Service Systems MPOEs MPOEs -
Issues of Implementing e-Learning • Quality Issues of e- learning Materials • Human Resources Development and Recruitment • Amendment of e-Learning Laws and Regulations • Standardization of e-Learning Technology
e-Learning Research • Kim, J. T. et al. (2006). A Study of Developing and Applying Learning Contents Models to Cyber Home Study – Science -. KERIS CR-4. • One of exploring studies for the method and strategy of development of internet contents which based on the characteristics of science course for those who are studying in a self-learning mode • Kwon, S. H. et al. (2005). An evaluation study of Effectiveness of the Cyber Home Learning System for Primary and Secondary School Students. KERIS RR2006-8. • Evaluated the effectiveness and satisfaction of nationwide e-Learning system, Cyber Home Learning System. • Kwon, S. H. et al. (2003). A Study of Building Strategy of Cyber Home Learning System. KERIS RR2003-12. • Proposed the theoretical back ground and building strategy for Cyber Home Learning System.
Main Services Services Description Free online service • Develop the self-directed learning content by difficulty level. • Serve outstanding self-directed learning content from the private sector and make it available as a free service Cyber Scholastic Aptitude Level Service • Create a test question bank by subject, unit, and topic. • Provide online service for self-testing of scholastic aptitude levels. Cyber Q&A • A professional answering service that students may have during e-Learning session. • Counseling service by professional student counselors in the field of career guidance Cyber Class • Provide a systematic tutoring service by subject, difficulty level, and class formation
Cyber Home Learning Web Sites • Provincial Cyber Home Learning System Web Sites (Seoul) Source: http:/ /www.kkulmat.com
Learning Material • Learning Material (Science, 4th Grade) Source: http:/ /www.kkulmat.com
Community Sites • Cyber Class Home page (Math, 6th Grade) Source: http:/ /www.kkulmat.com
Students and Teachers’ View • Students’ View: • Improve academic confidence • Help an after school supplementary learning • Improve learning motivation • Teachers’ View: • Improve interactivity (the teacher-learners, inter-learners, and inter-teachers) • Help learner-centered learning and Individualization • Contend to quantity and quality of the content, and immediate feedback.
Ways to Improve • Teacher’s Opinion Ways to Improve Cyber Home Learning System • Improve and stabilize system (including LMS for managing students or for students’ convenience) • Provide diverse contents • Strengthen system to induce students’ active participants (close schools, allocate class within same school, link to lesson or progressive rate, operate by levels) • Systematic PR to vitalize and induce participation of teachers and parents + prepare foundation to strengthen interaction on the system) • Expand rights of cyber teachers and vitalize information sharing among cyber teachers
Competency Pool Short-Term Trainable V A L U E Educatability • Passion • Positive Thinking • Cyber Ethics • Responsibility • Creative Thinking • Cyber Ethics • e-Lesson Planning • Learning Advice • e-Activity Evaluation • e-Activity Facilitation • on-Line Communication • Information Literacy • e-Class Management • Empowering Learning Motivation R O L E • Educatable Competancies T E A C H I N G • Subject Matter Expertise • Information Literacy • e-Lesson Planning • e-Activity Evaluation Long-Term Training needed • Empowering Learning Motivation • e-Activity Facilitation • On-Line Communication • Learning Advice • e-Class Management F A C I L I A T I N G B A S I C • Positive Thinking • Passion • Responsibility • Subject Matter Expertise • Creative Thinking Cyber Teaching Competencies Importance • The Most Important Competencies for Cyber Teaching Time • Short-Term Trainable Competencies Source: Song, et al.(2005). Competency Model Report of Cyber Teacher. KERIS CR2005-5
Cyber Teacher Training Course Source: Song, et al.(2005). Competency Model Report of Cyber Teacher. KERIS CR2005-5
Why ? Why ICT ? Why e-learning ? Why u-learning ?
New Digital Culture Industry Culture content NEW ! Digital culture Technology Culture technology Education content (e-learning) Education
Education ㆍCulture contents anytime anywhere CTculture technology anycontent anybody
culture Human, Education, Society and Culture education society human convergence
? HOW to ! dream reality
Learning fun everyone wherever Study ? Learning ? whenever
N-Generation Power, Passion, Participation, Pure Activevs Passive Playvs Work Payoffvs Patience Fantasyvs Reality Technology as Friendvs Technology as Foe
N-Generation Power, Passion, Participation, Pure Twitch speedvs Conventional speed Parallel processingvs Linear processing Random thinkingvs Linear thinking Graphics firstvs Text first Connectedvs Stand-alone
Integration of Digital stage Life-long Education Digital Education Higher Education Digital Education K-12 Education visual media network computer
Social community University environment Cyber space Home Schools Digital learning resources Vision The Promotion of e-Learning to build a learning community and achieve a national human resources development program.
Case Study “A Study on the Effectiveness of uLearning” 2006. 12.
Result of Class Observation - TPC Effect of teaching strategies - use software (Elem. School) • Use MS-Painter • Edit images • Write by a tablet pen Powerpoint worksheet
Effect of teaching strategies - use software (Mid. School) Hangul word-processor : Easy to type • Powerpoint : use in individual learning and collaborative learning • Construction of information, and Creativity improvement Painter, Movie maker : edit multimedia data Construction of image, and Creativity * The others : One-Note, Messenger, etc
Effect of teaching strategies – Teaching & Learning activity (Elem. School) Google Earth program • Google Earth program • Geographic map
Effect of teaching strategies – Teaching & Learning activity (Mid. School) • Messenger & web camera & mike • Teacher gives an English interview topic Interview with foreigner through the messengers in English
Effect of teaching strategies – Teaching & Learning activity (Mid. School) • Teachers make the learning contents and upload elearning “cyberschool” site • Learners can study anywhere and anytime Individual learning with TPC
Effect of teaching strategies – Teaching & Learning activity (Mid. School) • Using teacher made e-book English Class using e-book
Effect of teaching strategies – Interaction activity (Elem. School) • Group learning • Discussion using messenger & eforum Collaborative learning in class time
Effect of teaching strategies – Interaction activity (Mid. School) • Sharing learning results with classmates • Improve collaboration, opinion expression, and decision making competence Learners Interactionusing TPC and electronic blackboard