1 / 16

Management of European Funds in Western Scotland: ISPA Partners Meeting

Learn about the management of European Structural Funds in Western Scotland, including the objectives, roles of various institutions, processes, and the role of SEP Ltd.

sandyrichardson
Download Presentation

Management of European Funds in Western Scotland: ISPA Partners Meeting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Management of European Structural Funds in Western Scotland ISPA Partners Meeting April 2003 Laurie Russell Strathclyde European Partnership

  2. SCOTLAND?

  3. Objective 1 transition 310m euro Objective 3 310m euro Objective 2 250m euro Objective 2 73m euro Objective 2 480m euro EUROPEAN FUNDS MAP

  4. INSTITUTIONS Politicians Civil servants Agencies UK Parliament Local councils National enterprise agency Scottish Parliament and Executive of Ministers Scottish Executive Managing Authority Universities and colleges Wide range of non government organisations

  5. PROCESS European Commission Scottish Executive Partners SEP Ltd

  6. ROLES • SPD developed in partnership by Scottish Executive, SEP Ltd, local partners and EC • Administration of the Programmes: • Scottish Executive is the managing authority • Day to day management devolved to SEP Ltd • Public sector bodies (local councils, universities, colleges, enterprise agencies) develop projects and bid for European Funds support • Decisions on funding awards are taken by partnership committees

  7. WHAT IS SEP LTD? • Devolved Programme management in Strathclyde since 1988 - similar model in other Scottish regions since 1994 • Company limited by guarantee - not for profit with clear public sector values • Programme experience: • Objectives 2, • ERDF & ESF • Community Initiatives - RECHAR, URBAN, RESIDER, EQUAL • Regional Innovation Strategy, TEP

  8. WHAT DOES SEP LTD DO? • Pre-application advice and assistance • Managing the project life cycle • Managing the decision making process and committee system • Processing project applications, issuing offers of grant, processing claims, carrying out monitoring visits • Specialist support on horizontal themes • Disseminating good practice & learning • Publicising European Funds

  9. HOW IS THIS FUNDED? • Technical Assistance and Co-finance: • 50% from ERDF and ESF technical assistance • 50% from partners • Partners contributions: • Percentage of the Funds each is awarded • Set by SEP Ltd Board of Directors, agreed with Monitoring Committee • Fixed for duration of Programme • Not eligible for European Funds • Budget covers: • All office, staff and equipment • Publicity and marketing • Research into Programme issues

  10. HOW ARE FUNDS DISTRIBUTED? SEP Ltd staff working with partners pre-submission Development Application Projects received, referenced and acknowledged Assessment Technical eligibility, horizontal themes, suitability Appraisal Selection criteria, scoring system, recommendations Decision Programme Implementing Committee considers all recommendations Approved projects grant offer within 10 days of Ministerial approval of decisions Offer

  11. ECONOMIC & SOCIAL COHESION COMPETITIVE LOCATION LABOUR MARKET COMPETITIVE SMEs APPLICATION PROCESS PROGRAMME IMPLEMENTING COMMITTEE Decide Appraise Assess Apply PARTNERS

  12. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SCOTTISH SYSTEM • Regional economic planning - closer to problems leads to appropriate solutions • Flexible co-finance for projects - bottom up approach • Partnership - every agency has equal status • Decisions are made by consensus • Targeting resources on areas of economic need - strong local area development focus • Monitoring and evaluation built in • Sharing our knowledge / experience • Visibility of Europe on the ground

  13. ADVANTAGES • Consistent with and sensitive to but not driven by political priorities • Able to survive institutional or political change • Positive Scottish Parliament independent review in 2000 • Transparent and accountable • Equitable - all partners involved and have equal voice • Balances objective appraisal criteria with expertise and experience of partners

  14. DOWNSIDE? • Participation takes time, consultation takes longer • Effort needed to develop partnerships - they don’t happen naturally or quickly • Will need new skills and training needed • Some agencies will argue against transparency • Need to be clear about lines of accountability and who does what • Genuine regional policy will require the centre to relinquish power

  15. CONCLUSION • Partnership can be slower and therefore more expensive • But the long-term benefits outweigh the short-term issues • High level of positive outcomes • Innovative Programme management and projects • EC policy themes can be needed to mainstream at member state level • Exchanging policies, ideas and projects between regions and with the EC

  16. Up to date information…www.wsep.co.ukRegister to receive regular email updates

More Related