1 / 7

2010 CS Planning Committee

2010 CS Planning Committee. Technical & Conferences Activities Conference Competition Strategy John Walz 21-Jan-10. Conference Competition: Goals. Improve our conferences by learning from our competing conferences’ best practices

santo
Download Presentation

2010 CS Planning Committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 2010 CS Planning Committee • Technical & Conferences Activities • Conference Competition Strategy • John Walz • 21-Jan-10

  2. Conference Competition: Goals • Improve our conferences by learning from our competing conferences’ best practices • request TC Chairs and their Conference Chairs to identify their completing conferences • conference attributes, e.g. quality of authors, program committee, ease of doing business, etc • conference registration fees, • Compete against ACM Full Service Conference Business Model • confirm ACM Full Service Conference Business Model could work for TC and our sponsored Conference Steering Committees in USA • confirm feasible CS Full Service Conference Business Model • articulate, pilot, learn, offer, & plan CS Full Service Conference Business service • Improve Conference margins • For 2008 & 2009 conferences with small margins / deficit, request General Chair to identify competing conferences as a possible root cause; compare and analyze registration fee structure • During conference proposal, offer range of competing conf. reg. fees January, 2010 CS Planning Committee Meeting

  3. Conference Competition: Measurable Benefits • Active web portal to share best conference practices derived from CS, IEEE, and non-IEEE conferences • Increase # of financial sponsor conferences • ACM win-backs, move TCS into Financial • Increase # authors & attendees for conferences using best practices • Improve large conferences’ attendee satisfaction with new Full Service option • Increase overall conference margin related to increased conference fees • # deficit conferences decrease January, 2010 CS Planning Committee Meeting

  4. Conference Competition: Resources • Staff / volunteer partnership for annual competitive reviews • Develop COG database to collect & maintain competitive information • Startup funds for CS Full Service Conference Business service • financial modeling, financial policies / accounting practice • staffing: COG, Accounting January, 2010 CS Planning Committee Meeting 4

  5. Conference Competition: Timeline • 14-Jan T & C Vice-Chairs agreed to support project • Feb-May Recruit Volunteers, assign CS Staff, collect data and prepare report • 15-May Business Case / model completed • 9-Jun Propose CS PPM competitive changes • Jun-Jul Full Service process, skills, resources, & first pilot identified; • Sep COG staff/outsource decision; First Full Service pilot started • 17-Nov Report to CS BOG on progress of changes to PPM • 2011 Pilot organizers satisfaction survey, lessons learned; Service revised January, 2010 CS Planning Committee Meeting

  6. Background January, 2010 CS Planning Committee Meeting

  7. Background details • Keep in touch with our CSC Chairs with online surveys • CS Full Service Conference Business service should include • license for a good peer-review system • content management system for input into proceedings production and CD-ROM for Xplore • conference registration information imported into TECA • Benchmark low cost conference business models, e.g. International Quality and Productive Center (IQPC) • Understand registration fee elasticity due to conference maturity / life cycle January, 2010 CS Planning Committee Meeting

More Related