1 / 40

Competitive position, managerial ties, and profitability of foreign firms in China: an interactive perspective

Competitive position, managerial ties, and profitability of foreign firms in China: an interactive perspective. Julie Juan Li , Kevin Zheng Zhou and Alan T Shao. MA2M0209 Cari Lin. INTRODUCTION (1/2).

santo
Download Presentation

Competitive position, managerial ties, and profitability of foreign firms in China: an interactive perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Competitive position, managerial ties,and profitability of foreign firms in China:an interactive perspective Julie Juan Li , Kevin Zheng Zhou and Alan T Shao MA2M0209 Cari Lin

  2. INTRODUCTION (1/2) • Here are two primary positions of competitive advantage which are differentiation and low cost. • Most research on the competitive strategy perspective only focus on developed economies, how about emerging economies especially China?

  3. INTRODUCTION (2/2) • China has strong institutional environments but lack of market-based institutions makes it unknown whether foreign firms can adopt market-oriented strategies. • Many suggest that firms must rely on managerial ties for example: political tie (with government officials) or business tie (business communities).

  4. RESEARCH BACKGROUND

  5. RESEARCH BACKGROUND (1/2) • This study not only examines the roles of competitive positions and managerial ties independently but also interactive position that may describe more accurately how foreign firms achieve better performance in China. Research purpose

  6. RESEARCH BACKGROUND (2/2) • As a foreign-invested-enterprises, how can they achieve competitive and superior performance in China? • Can foreign firms adopt a differentiation or low-cost position to achieve superior performance when they entering China? Research questions

  7. LITERATURE REVIEW

  8. LITERATURE REVIEW (1/10) Research conceptual model H2 H3 H4 H1

  9. LITERATURE REVIEW (2/10) • Competitive strategy perspective • Differentiation position • A differentiation position is achieved when buyers consistently perceive a firm’s offerings as unique in the market (Porter, 1985). Theory and hypotheses

  10. LITERATURE REVIEW (3/10) • Song and Perry (1997) indicate that product differentiation leads to superior new product performance for both US and Japanese firms. Hypothesis 1(a): A differentiation position has a positive effect on the profitability of foreign firms in China.

  11. LITERATURE REVIEW (4/10) • Competitive strategy perspective • Low-cost position • A low-cost position aims to provide comparable products at a lower cost. It leads to above-average returns because firms can charge a lower price than competitors but still earn profits (Porter, 1985). Hypothesis 1(b): A low-cost position has a positive effect on the profitability of foreign firms in China.

  12. LITERATURE REVIEW (5/10) • An interactive perspective • During the initial stages of economic transition, business in emerging economies is predominantly coordinated through ties-based mechanisms because of the lack of formal, market-supporting institutions (North, 1990). • In emerging economies, in which formal institutional constraints (e.g., laws, regulations) remain relatively weak: thus firms must rely on informal institutional constraints, such as interpersonal ties, to facilitate their economic exchanges (Xin & Pearce, 1996).

  13. LITERATURE REVIEW (6/10) • Political ties • Political ties represent managers’ connections with government officials and support organizations (Peng & Luo, 2000). • Many firms hire unqualified employees who are relatives of government leaders and place them in important positions, even though their skill is poor or unprofessional (Warren, Dunfee & Li, 2004). Hypothesis 2(a): The utilization of political ties has a negative effect on the profitability of foreign firms in China.

  14. LITERATURE REVIEW (7/10) • Business ties • Business tiesare managers’ connections with their counterparts at other firms such as buyers, suppliers, and competitors (Peng & Luo, 2000). • Tight linkages with suppliers enable a firm to acquire quality materials and services and timely delivery (Boisot & Child, 1996; Xin & Pearce, 1996). Hypothesis 2(b): The utilization of business ties has a positive effect on the profitability of foreign firms in China.

  15. LITERATURE REVIEW (8/10) • Moderating effects of ties • Political ties : May negatively moderate the relationship between competitive positions and profitability of foreign firms for several reasons (Li, Zhou, & Shao, 2009) • When foreign firms use political ties in their business operations, they rely on favorable treatment from the government to achieve their business success (Li, 2005).

  16. LITERATURE REVIEW (9/10) • Foreign firms tend to excel at market-oriented strategies, based on the rule of the ‘‘invisible hand’’. A heavy reliance on political ties, it's involves the ‘‘grabbing hand’’ of government. The incompatibility of the two rules and mindsets likely disrupts foreign firms’ normal operations and their efforts to build a unique image or minimize costs (Shleifer & Vishny, 1998). • The ultimate goal of the Chinese government is to build globally competitive Chinese firms (Nolan, 2001). Hypothesis 3: The utilization of political ties negatively moderates the effects of (a) differentiation and (b) low-cost positions on the profitability of foreign firms in China.

  17. LITERATURE REVIEW (10/10) • Moderating effects of ties • Business ties : To implement their differentiation positions successfully, foreign firms must thoroughly understand the preferences of local customers, which is often problematic because foreign firms are unfamiliar with the host country (Zaheer, 1995). • Close ties with buyer companies provide foreign firms with insights into how to develop products specifically for local demand. With this knowledge, foreign firms can better implement their differentiation positions and increase profits (Li, Zhou & Shao, 2009). Hypothesis 4: The utilization of business ties positively moderates the effects of (a) differentiation and (b) low-cost positions on the profitability of foreign firms in China.

  18. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

  19. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (1/10) • 600 FIEs from a list of manufacturing firms which located in three majored areas (Beijing, Guangzhou, and Shanghai) • Qualitative method • Quantitative method Research Sampling Research Instrument

  20. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2/10) • Random sample of 600 FIEs from a list of manufacturing firms with four-digit standard industrial classification codes 2011–3899,which span diverse industries. • Questionnaire design (seven-point Likert scales): • 5 in-deep interview with senior marketing managers (measure the validity of items). • 20 senior managers to answer the questionnaire (provide feedback about design and wording). Sampling method

  21. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (3/10) • Stage 1 (February/March 2004): Telephone contacts prompted 228 senior manger to agree to participate, interviewers then interviewed 188 respondents successfully, the response rate of 31.1%. • Stage 2 (2005): Collected information about return of assets (2004) from 188 firms however one firm’s ROA was not available. Final sample size is 187. Sampling response rate

  22. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (4/10) • Cross-validation • Construct validity • Control variable (firm size, firm age, firm ownership, industry, and market growth) • Hierarchical Regression analysis • Moderator (interactions) Analytical procedures

  23. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (5/10) • Cross-validation • First • Second 25 Key customer company 25 187 … …

  24. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (6/10) • Construct validity • Assessed the construct validity of our perceptual measures by estimating an overall four-factor(differentiation position, low-cost position, political tie, business ties) confirmatory measurement model. • The model provides a satisfactory fit to the data. • All average variances extracted (AVE) except one are greater than 0.50. Thus the measures demonstrate adequate convergent validity and reliability.

  25. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (7/10) • Control variable • To account for the effects of extraneous variables, we included firm size, firm age, firm ownership, industry, and market growth as control variables. • Some of them are dummy variable, for example Firm ownership that controls for potential variations between international joint ventures (coded 1) and foreign wholly owned firms (coded 0).

  26. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (8/10) • Hierarchical Regression analysis(階層迴歸分析) • 假設有a, b, c 三個自變數 (independent variables)，想要看這些變數個別對 依變數的影響。 • 如果將 a, b, c 一次放進迴歸分析裡面，可以得到整體的解釋力，然而，有時候研究者有理論或實際依據，認為 a, b, c 必須依照不同的順序放入迴歸分析中。 • 因此將a, b, c 依序個別放入，那我們就有三個models，hierarchical (階層)指的就是這些 models之間有層次性或階層性的關係。 http://newgenerationresearcher.blogspot.tw/2011/01/hierarchical-regression.html

  27. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (9/10) • Moderator (interactions) • 調節變數會影響 IV和 DV之間的關係。 • IV和 DV之間的關係會因為 moderator的值而改變。 Moderator IV DV http://newgenerationresearcher.blogspot.tw/2010/06/mediatormoderator.html

  28. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (10/10) • 交互作用顧名思義就是雙方會互相影響。 • 如右圖，在回歸方程式中，要將 IV、moderator和 IV與 moderator的乘積 (就是兩個變數乘起來) 放進去。 • 如果要測試有沒有交互作用項，只要看右圖 c 是否為顯著。 a IV b DV Moderator c IV  Moderator http://newgenerationresearcher.blogspot.tw/2010/06/mediatormoderator.html

  29. RESULTS

  30. RESULT (1/2) • Hierarchical Regression analysis • Model 1: Included control variable • Model 2: Add independent variables • H1(a): Differentiation position (DP) • H1(b): Low-cost position (LCP) • H2(a): Political ties (PT) • H3(b): Business ties (BT) • Model 3: Finally add interactions • H3(a): PTDP • H3(b): PTLCP • H4(a): BTDP • H4(b): BTLCP

  31. RESULT (2/2)

  32. CONCLUTION AND DISCUSSION

  33. CONCLUTION (1/3) • Both differentiation and low-cost positions foster the profitability of foreign firms, the benefit of a differentiation position is conditional on political and business ties in different directions. • Political ties impede and business ties strengthen the positive effect of a differentiation position on foreign firms’ profitability.

  34. CONCLUTION (2/3) • What should foreign firms focus in China: competitive positions or managerial ties? • The findings suggest that foreign firms can adopt either a differentiation or a low-cost position to achieve superior performance. • However, foreign firms must understand that advantage and disadvantage between used political ties and business ties.

  35. CONCLUTION (3/3) • Political ties impede the impact of a differentiation position on firm profitability, as a result, foreign firms may lose their competitive edge when relying heavily on political connections. • Business ties strengthen the effect of a differentiation position on the profitability of foreign firms, foreign firms must actively build ties with local business communities, such as buyers, suppliers, and competitors, to differentiate themselves and achieve higher returns.

  36. LIMITATIONS AND FURTHER RESEARCH

  37. LIMITATIONS AND FURTHER RESEARCH • The measure of firm profitability employs a 1-year lag, which only captures the short-term effect of political ties, though political ties may take longer to pay back. • The measures of competitive positions and managerial ties are perceptual. Though cross-validation supports the use of perceptual measures, managers’ perceptions may differ from reality. • Further research could also take a cross-country approach to examine whether this findings can use in other countries.

  38. REFERENCES

  39. REFERENCES (1/2) Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1996. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China’s emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(12): 600–628. Li, J. J. 2005. The formation of managerial networks of foreign firms in China: The effects of strategic orientations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 22(4): 423–443. Li, J. J., Zhou, K. Z., Shao, A.T. 2009. Competitive position, managerial ties, and profitability of foreign firms in China: an interactive perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 339-352. Nolan, P. 2001. China and the global economy. New York: Palgrave. North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. 2000. Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 486–501. Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage. New York: The Free Press.

  40. REFERENCES (2/2) Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. 1998. The grabbing hand: Government pathologies and their cures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Song, M. X., & Perry, M. E. 1997. A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States. Journal of Marketing, 61(2): 1–18. Warren, D. E., Dunfee, T. W., & Li, N. 2004. Social exchange in China: The double-edged sword of guanxi. Journal of Business Ethics, 55(4): 355–372. Xin, K., & Pearce, J. L. 1996. Guanxi: Connections as substitutes for formal institutional support. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6): 1461–1568. Zaheer, S. 1995. Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2): 341–363.

More Related